PostgreSQL Wins LJ Editor's Choice Award
Quickfoot writes "PostgreSQL has won the LJ Editor's choice award for database servers the second year in a row and three times total (2000, 2003 and 2004). With the upcoming features in version 8.0 PostgreSQL is posed to do even better in 2005."
PostgreSQL has for a long time been an excellent choice of database with full transaction support, sequences, trigers, unicode and much much more. I personally prefer working with it to expensive alternatives such as Oracle and DB2.
The PGAdmin3 tool also allows for those scared/lazy for the command line to use interogate it's schemas.
What I'm not too sure about is where any company is providing support on a level one would get from Oracle or IBM. Oracle's support is actually extremely good (in my experience). Anyone point to any companies ready to provide PostgreSQL support?
----
Comment removed based on user account deletion
PostgreSQL has, for some time, been more scalable and more reliable than MySQL, which is, IMNSHO, a mere toy by comparison. I've pushed PostgreSQL to several major corporate clients, who have been more than happy with it (indeed, some have added stuff on and pushed the changes back to the main source base, something I would not have considered likely from the sort of corporates I'm talking about)
Hell, it's even for simple, single-user database apps, especially when linked to a good ORM layer (EnterpriseObjects/GNUstep DB et al). Why more people doing web development don't push it, I don't know. Everything's bloody MySQL. Blech.