Slashdot Mirror


CIS Releases FreeBSD Security Benchmark

JohnnyDime writes "The Center for Internet Security (CIS) has released a security benchmark and auditing tool for FreeBSD versions 4.8 and later. This is a free download available from cisecurity.org. CIS is a non-profit, consensus driven organization that uses experts from the public, private, and academic sectors to develop security guidance for operating systems and applications."

44 comments

  1. Heh by setagllib · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not that it needs one ;)

    But more proof that BSD is not dead. It gets support from the companies that know what they're doing.

    Just you wait for 5.3-RELEASE!

    --
    Sam ty sig.
    1. Re:Heh by Carnildo · · Score: -1, Troll

      But more proof that BSD is not dead. It gets support from the companies that know what they're doing.

      Don't you mean "CIS confirms: BSD is dying"?

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Heh by sp0rk173 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And just YOU wait until the VFS system in DragonFly finishes it's top-to-bottom re-write! I have a feeling this new BSD isn't going to be something to sneeze at. I've been following the kernel@ mailing list, and it sounds damn awesome. It's going to be one hell of a beautiful little OS. Let's hope it runs as beautifully as it sounds on paper when all is coded and done.

    3. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      at comment #10,000,000 yet? michael simms blows goats.

    4. Re:Heh by count_sporkula · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      At last they reached the last of the little booths, set down Marvin between them and rested in the shade. Fenchurch bought some cufflinks for Russell, cufflinks that had set in them little polished pebbles which had been picked up from the Quentulus Quazgar Mountains, directly underneath the letters of fire in which was written God's Final Message to His Creation.
      Arthur flipped through a little rack of devotional tracts on the counter, little meditations on the meaning of the Message.
      "Ready?" he said to Fenchurch, who nodded.
      They heaved up Marvin between them.

      They rounded the foot of the Quentulus Quazgar Mountains, and there was the Message written in blazing letters along the crest of the Mountain. There was a little observation vantage point with a rail built along the top of a large rock facing it, from which you could get a good view. It had a little pay-telescope for looking at the letters in detail, but no one would ever use it because the letters burned with the divine brilliance of the heavens and would, if seen through a telescope, have severely damaged the retina and optic nerve.
      They gazed at God's Final Message in wonderment, and were slowly and ineffably filled with a great sense of peace, and of final and complete understanding.
      Fenchurch sighed. "Yes," she said, "that was it."
      They had been staring at it for fully ten minutes before they became aware that Marvin, hanging between their shoulders, was in difficulties. The robot could no longer lift his head, had not read the message. They lifted his head, but he complained that his vision circuits had almost gone.
      They found a coin and helped him to the telescope. He complained and insulted them, but they helped him look at each individual letter in turn, The first letter was a "f", the second an "a", the third a "c", and then a "t". Then there was a gap. An "b" followed, then an "s" and a "d". Another gap.
      Marvin paused for a rest.
      After a few moments they resumed and let him see the "i", and the "s".
      After a few moments they resumed and let him see The last one was a long one, and Marvin needed It started with an "d", then "y" then an "i".
      After a final pause, Marvin gathered his strength for the last stretch.
      He read the "n", and at last the final "g", and staggered back into their arms.
      "I think," he murmured at last, from deep within his corroding rattling thorax, "I feel good about it."
      The lights went out in his eyes for absolutely the very last time ever.
      Luckily, there was a stall nearby where you could rent scooters from guys with green wings.

      --
      you're winner!!

    5. Re:Heh by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is nice... lets see when there is a result (have seen enough results from the people involved in Fragonfly, so that was not intended as a cynical statement, just as a huint that only what exists today can be used today)

      Anyway, unlike what some people believe, this kind of competition between different BSD distributions is a good thing, it allows people to go their own way with their ideas, and after a while all BSDs get a better solution (if the idea turned out to be better that is)

    6. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      finishes it's top-to-bottom re-write

      "its".

    7. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know that Dragonfly kernel is based off of FreeBSD 4.x , but is the userland going to reflect 4.x or 5.x? Things in 5.x are layed out in a near perfect Unix hieararchy IMHO, I'd hate to go back to the 4.x layout =/

    8. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just try the live cd if you want a hint how it works

  2. It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    Fact: *BSD is dying

  3. Read carefully. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I am 25 years old, 5'10", brown eyes, brown hair, slim build. I enjoy posting on Slashdot, long walks on Pacific beaches, and romantic dinners.

    I should warn any prospective contacts that I am a BSDite. We are a religious group that believes not only that it is possible to revive BSD, but also that it is a holy imperative to do so.

    A lot of girls are put off by this belief. I know, it's not a mainstream religion; everyone knows that BSD is dead. I encourage you, though, to look at what progress we've made. Sure, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, and ekkoBSD are all long-deceased, and Mac OS X, with its Darwin/BSD foundations, is produced by Apple, a company that is barely clinging to life. But our great BSDite leaders have recently conducted a seance with the spirit of 4.4BSD, and they've put the results of their encounter into the form of Dragonfly BSD, which now boasts a user base of over one dozen.

    Still not convinced that reviving BSD is a sensible religious tenet? Take a look inside our holy scriptures, The Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD Operating System. I think you'll like what you see, and I think you'll reach enlightenment if you read carefully. You'll come to know, as I do, that we *can* bring BSD back from the clutches of death; in fact, we're already doing so!

    As for me, I'm looking for a woman who's interested in a long-term relationship firmly grounded in the principles of BSD. If you feel that BSD is unquestionably dead, please do not respond unless you are interested in trying to revive it by, e.g., by working on the Dragonfly project. Include a photo of yourself and your BSD machines, and I'll reciprocate.

    Hoping to meet Ms. Right very soon!

    1. Re:Read carefully. by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm... offtopic? more like troll.. and for once a somewhat funny one ;)

  4. My Dream of BSD: An Elegy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    My Dream of BSD: An Elegy
    By The Trolliterati

    Methought I saw my late FreeBSD
    Brought to me, like Alcestis, from the grave,
    As Richie brought to Joy the O/S brave,
    Rescu'd from death by force, though gone from me.
    Neither Open, Net, nor ekko, but Free!
    I yearned to grasp it, yearned that I might save
    At least one copy from the moldy grave.
    Like BeOS, I hoped that BSD
    Could live in dabblers' hearts, to their delight;
    It brought me joy! I felt no more resign'd!
    I grabbed the sweet CD, shining so bright;
    But Oh! as to install it I inclin'd,
    I wak'd, it fled, and day brought back my night.

  5. Um...anybody else notice something weird? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    A New Elegy for BSD
    Brought to you by The Trolliterati

    My bedside clock drags seconds into days--
    Now two a.m., now almost two-oh-one--
    My sleepless eyes grow teary as I gaze
    Into the night and think of bygone fun.

    For BSD is dead, dead ere its prime;
    Dead, oh! dead, before its thirtieth year.
    Almighty Linux, in but little time,
    Destroyed the OS I once held dear.

    Like Orpheus, I languished in my pain
    When the cold grave swallowed Eurydice;
    I piped my woeful song of sighs in vain
    For nothing could revive FreeBSD.

    Young Dragonfly now goes where Ekko led;
    I cry to think of Open and of Net.
    If tears could open coffins--raise the dead!--
    Then BSD might have a future yet.

    My tears have drenched the pillow that was dry.
    Tomorrow will my sorrow come again.
    I lie back down and tell myself the lie,
    "FreeBSD lives on in OS X."

  6. Re:It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dy by ToasterTester · · Score: 5, Funny

    The same guy keeps cutting and pasting the same message over and over. Just the number of times he's posted it is proof FreeBSD is not dead.

    Linus, will you please stop posting this.


    FACT: Chuckie Daemon will not die!

  7. seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Seriously, how many people are still using BSD on a regular basis? What is your estimate?

    1. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmmm...

      Yahoo.com

      Fark.com

      Generally, clueful people.

    2. Re:seriously by stox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What truly intelligent person isn't? ;->

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    3. Re:seriously by frickenhell · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I use FreeBSD 5.2.1 flawlessly on my Dell Inspiron 8200. The ports systems is way cool.

      If I have to use Linux then it must be Debian. Package management is the key.

    4. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      So, basically, about 3 personages are still using it , right?

    5. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I have to use Linux I would use Mandrake better than Debian.
      Package management is the key and (here is my strongest point) it has a way cooler logo !

    6. Re:seriously by Ezdaloth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually it's 4, i use FreeBSD too.

    7. Re:seriously by torstenvl · · Score: 0, Troll

      Debian's package management is technologically superior to Mandrake's. dpkg/dselect are way more flexible and powerful. But the ports system is way better. That's why true Linux afficiandos who don't use Debian use Gentoo -- portage is based on the FreeBSD ports system. The only thing is that there isn't a simple, one-size-fits-all graphical interface to all that AFAIK.

      PS -- I'm #5!

    8. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on ?
      At least one example ?

      by the way urpm has a great GUI tool too (rpmdrake).

    9. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooops, it's 3 again. I just switched to Mandrake. Couldn't take FreeBSD no more. Sorry, pals.

    10. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one who uses Debian actually uses low-level programs like dpkg/dselect. People use much simpler and automatic apt-* . These are superior to everything else in any other distribution (that is not a clone of Debian). FreeBSD is about 20 years behind here.

    11. Re:seriously by torstenvl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Troll? WTF. I'm tired of Moderators with axes to grind.

      Debian's package management IS technologically superior to Mandrakes. Period. It's more flexible and more powerful. In Mandrake there is no way to 'purge' a package -- getting rid of the original package contents and configuration files that were generated therewith and essentially making your system as though that package were never there. There is also no way to set up different dependency levels, hence the complaints about Mandrake being 'bloated' with unnecessary dependencies -- RPM doesn't provide a way to make optional dependencies. It just doesn't.

      Ports/Portage is more flexible yet, as you can specify compiler flags with -DWHATEVER in Ports or with USE flags in Portage. I use this feature very frequently, for example so I can install JED without needing to install X11 first. A 'purge' feature would be nice here too, but I guess the whole premise is that you're supposed to be familiar enough with your system using Gentoo or FreeBSD that you can decide to keep or remove configs and so on anyway. That, and Gentoo has its etc-update thing, which is handy.

      There. I've backed up my opinions. If you Mod me down for saying things I have objective evidence for, well, you can just lick my salty nuts.

    12. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you have 200-500 packages installed on your system, being "familiar enough with your system" becomes a challenge to put it mildly. That's why Debian's automatic system is by far superior to the competition.

      Posting anonymoustly, because it's obvious that BSD trolls with mod points aren't going to like this.

    13. Re:seriously by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      Quite all right. I run it on several machines (both desktop & server), so I more than make up for the one lost user.

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
  8. Secrets of the Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    What Killed FreeBSD

    [ed. note: in the following text, former FreeBSD developer Mike Smith gives his reasons for abandoning FreeBSD]

    When I stood for election to the FreeBSD core team nearly two years ago, many of you will recall that it was after a long series of debates during which I maintained that too much organisation, too many rules and too much formality would be a bad thing for the project.

    Today, as I read the latest discussions on the future of the FreeBSD project, I see the same problem; a few new faces and many of the old going over the same tired arguments and suggesting variations on the same worthless schemes. Frankly I'm sick of it.

    FreeBSD used to be fun. It used to be about doing things the right way. It used to be something that you could sink your teeth into when the mundane chores of programming for a living got you down. It was something cool and exciting; a way to spend your spare time on an endeavour you loved that was at the same time wholesome and worthwhile.

    It's not anymore. It's about bylaws and committees and reports and milestones, telling others what to do and doing what you're told. It's about who can rant the longest or shout the loudest or mislead the most people into a bloc in order to legitimise doing what they think is best. Individuals notwithstanding, the project as a whole has lost track of where it's going, and has instead become obsessed with process and mechanics.

    So I'm leaving core. I don't want to feel like I should be "doing something" about a project that has lost interest in having something done for it. I don't have the energy to fight what has clearly become a losing battle; I have a life to live and a job to keep, and I won't achieve any of the goals I personally consider worthwhile if I remain obligated to care for the project.

    Discussion

    I'm sure that I've offended some people already; I'm sure that by the time I'm done here, I'll have offended more. If you feel a need to play to the crowd in your replies rather than make a sincere effort to address the problems I'm discussing here, please do us the courtesy of playing your politics openly.

    From a technical perspective, the project faces a set of challenges that significantly outstrips our ability to deliver. Some of the resources that we need to address these challenges are tied up in the fruitless metadiscussions that have raged since we made the mistake of electing officers. Others have left in disgust, or been driven out by the culture of abuse and distraction that has grown up since then. More may well remain available to recruitment, but while the project is busy infighting our chances for successful outreach are sorely diminished.

    There's no simple solution to this. For the project to move forward, one or the other of the warring philosophies must win out; either the project returns to its laid-back roots and gets on with the work, or it transforms into a super-organised engineering project and executes a brilliant plan to deliver what, ultimately, we all know we want.

    Whatever path is chosen, whatever balance is struck, the choosing and the striking are the important parts. The current indecision and endless conflict are incompatible with any sort of progress.

    Trying to dissect the above is far beyond the scope of any parting shot, no matter how distended. All I can really ask of you all is to let go of the minutiae for a moment and take a look at the big picture. What is the ultimate goal here? How can we get there with as little overhead as possible? How would you like to be treated by your fellow travellers?

    Shouts

    To the Slashdot "BSD is dying" crowd - big deal. Death is part of the cycle; take a look at your soft, pallid bodies and consider that right this very moment, parts of you are dying. See? It's not so bad.

    To the bulk of the FreeBSD committerbase and the developer community at large - keep your eyes on the real goals. I

  9. BSD is NOT dying. HPUX is. by alphaque · · Score: 4, Interesting

    hmm, oddly the HTML title and title bar both say "Benchmarks for HPUX". :)

    see the link above at http://www.cisecurity.org/bench_freebsd.html

    1. Re:BSD is NOT dying. HPUX is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      *BSD IS DYING
      *_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_
      g_______________________________________________g_ _
      o_/_____\_____________\____________/____\_______o_ _
      a|_______|_____________\__________|______|______a_ _
      t|_______`._____________|_________|_______:_____t_ _
      s`________|_____________|________\|_______|_____s_ _
      e_\_______|_/_______/__\\\___--___\\_______:____e_ _
      x__\______\/____--~~__________~--__|_\_____|____x_ _
      *___\______\_-~____________________~-_\____|____*_ _
      g____\______\_________.--------.______\|___|____g_ _
      o______\_____\______//_________(_(__>__\___|____o_ _
      a_______\___.__C____)_________(_(____>__|__/____a_ _
      t_______/\_|___C_____)/______\_(_____>__|_/_____t_ _
      s______/_/\|___C_____)_______|__(___>___/__\____s_ _
      e_____|___(____C_____)\______/__//__/_/_____\___e_ _
      x_____|____\__|_____\\_________//_(__/_______|__x_ _
      *____|_\____\____)___`----___--'_____________|__*_ _
      g____|__\______________\_______/____________/_|_g_ _
      o___|______________/____|_____|__\____________|_o_ _
      a___|_____________|____/_______\__\___________|_a_ _
      t___|__________/_/____|_________|__\___________|t_ _
      s___|_________/_/______\__/\___/____|__________|s_ _
      e__|_________/_/________|____|_______|_________|e_ _
      x__|__________|_________|____|_______|_________|x_ _
      *_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_


      Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

      Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

      Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

  10. Re:It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dy by endx7 · · Score: 4, Informative

    FACT: his name is not Chuck, or Chuckie or anything like that. If you must give him a name, call him Beastie.

    At least, I think it is a him.

  11. It's time for the Daily Puzzler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Today's Puzzler asks you to discover what the following four items have in common:
    1. Laci Peterson
    2. Lori Hacking
    3. Nicole Simpson
    4. FreeBSD
    Submit your response along with a stamped self-addressed envelope.
    See contest rules for further details. Void where prohibited.
  12. Re:It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    DEATH SMELLS LIKE POOP
    *_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_
    g_______________________________________________g_ _
    o_/_____\_____________\____________/____\_______o_ _
    a|_______|_____________\__________|______|______a_ _
    t|_______`._____________|_________|_______:_____t_ _
    s`________|_____________|________\|_______|_____s_ _
    e_\_______|_/_______/__\\\___--___\\_______:____e_ _
    x__\______\/____--~~__________~--__|_\_____|____x_ _
    *___\______\_-~____________________~-_\____|____*_ _
    g____\______\_________.--------.______\|___|____g_ _
    o______\_____\______//_________(_(__>__\___|____o_ _
    a_______\___.__C____)_________(_(____>__|__/____a_ _
    t_______/\_|___C_____)/______\_(_____>__|_/_____t_ _
    s______/_/\|___C_____)_______|__(___>___/__\____s_ _
    e_____|___(____C_____)\______/__//__/_/_____\___e_ _
    x_____|____\__|_____\\_________//_(__/_______|__x_ _
    *____|_\____\____)___`----___--'_____________|__*_ _
    g____|__\______________\_______/____________/_|_g_ _
    o___|______________/____|_____|__\____________|_o_ _
    a___|_____________|____/_______\__\___________|_a_ _
    t___|__________/_/____|_________|__\___________|t_ _
    s___|_________/_/______\__/\___/____|__________|s_ _
    e__|_________/_/________|____|_______|_________|e_ _
    x__|__________|_________|____|_______|_________|x_ _
    *_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_


    Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

    Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

    Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

  13. Hard Times for *BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    So why now? Why did *BSD fail? Once you get past the fact that *BSD is fragmented between a myriad of incompatible kernels, there is the historical record of failure and of failed operating systems. *BSD experienced moderate success about 15 years ago in academic circles. Since then it has been in steady decline. We all know *BSD keeps losing market share but why? Is it the problematic personalities of many of the key players? Or is it larger than their troubled personalities?

    The record is clear on one thing: no operating system has ever come back from the grave. Efforts to resuscitate *BSD are one step away from spiritualists wishing to communicate with the dead. As the situation grows more desperate for the adherents of this doomed OS, the sorrow takes hold. An unremitting gloom hangs like a death shroud over a once hopeful *BSD community. The hope is gone; a mournful nostalgia has settled in. Now is the end time for *BSD.

  14. What's in a name? by JamesTRexx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aren't we supposed to call it our new overlord?

    --
    home
  15. Re:It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dy by agraupe · · Score: 2, Funny
    FACT: Chuckie Daemon will not die!
    # kill -9 `pidof chuckie`
  16. Re:It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > FACT: Chuckie Daemon will not die!
    > # kill -9 `pidof chuckie`

    This is ironic. pidof is linuxism. The only BSD you can kill is in your own fantasy world...

    % pidof
    pidof: Command not found.
    %

    Try :
    # killall -9 chuckie
    No matching processes were found
    #

  17. Re:It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Won't work if "Chuckie" is on disk. (has the D flag in ps). If this happens, the system won't let it die until it comes out of being on disk.

  18. Re:It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    killall doesn't work on all the BSD's. I am not positive on NetBSD, but I know that killall does not exist on OpenBSD.

  19. Re:It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dy by 680x0 · · Score: 1
    It's not on NetBSD... at least any of the versions I have:
    • 1.6/sparc
    • 1.6.2/sparc
    • 1.6.2/sparc64
    • 1.6.2/x86
  20. Re:It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dy by okeby235 · · Score: 2

    I have a feeling he is referring to the "Charlie Root" that the root account uses as its full name.