Slashdot Mirror


Cooling Toronto Using Lake Ontario

An anonymous reader writes "Air cooled by the frigid waters deep in Lake Ontario started bringing relief to buildings in downtown Toronto on Tuesday after the valves were symbolically opened on the multi-million-dollar project. The company says that they have the capacity to air condition 100 office buildings or 8,000 homes - the equivalent of 32 million square feet of building space. They note that the cooling system reduces energy usage, freeing up megawatts from the Ontario's electrical grid, minimizes ozone-depleting refrigerants and reduces the amount of carbon dioxide entering the air."

17 of 698 comments (clear)

  1. Environmental effects by jonbryce · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will this not cause the lake to warm up? What are the envirnmental effects of this? Have they been considered?

    1. Re:Environmental effects by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you take cold water from the bottom, then surely it will be replaced with warmer water from above. Is there anything that makes the water cool down once it is in the lake?

    2. Re:Environmental effects by black+mariah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The water at the bottom of the lake isn't special. The only reason it's cold is because it's so far away from the surface that it can't be heated by the sun, and the water on top helps wick away any heat that might build up. Go dive into a lake. The first few inches of the surface might be warm, but down as little as five feet you're looking at a significant drop in temperature, and it just gets colder as it goes down.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    3. Re:Environmental effects by VeryProfessional · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We have to recognise that any interaction we have with the environment is going to have some impact on it. This impact will by definition be negative if we characterise any change to the existing equilibrium as being negative. The smart thing to do is to spread the impact by interacting in lots of different ways on a lower level, rather than abusing a single resource, as we currently do with fossil fuels.

      I applaud what they are doing in Canada. The more alternative energy sources we use, the better.

    4. Re:Environmental effects by black+mariah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It cools. How do you think the water got cold to begin with?

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    5. Re:Environmental effects by mdfst13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From where were they getting their drinking water previously? My first guess is that this just substitutes water taken from the bottom of the lake for water that would otherwise be taken from the top. Net change in water levels (vs. not doing this) would thus be negligible.

    6. Re:Environmental effects by gowen · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The problem is that after thewind has past through that, it's no longer strong enough to push clouds,
      Do you have a source for this. I find it extremely difficult to believe, given the height of clouds, compared to the height of wind turbines...
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    7. Re:Environmental effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Water has 4 times the heat capacity of air (4kJ/kg vs. 1kJ/kg).

      So 59000 tons of water heated one degree can cool 59000 tons of air 4 degrees.

      Furthermore the lake has 27 million times more water than that, so cooling 59000 tons of air 4 degrees would warm the lake (average temp) 0.00000004 degrees.

    8. Re:Environmental effects by An+dochasac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Forgot the link, and me login: Toronto's solution will have far less impact than Milwaukee's solution of building more coal power plants which will suck 2.2 billion gallons of water and fish from Lake Michigan every day and convert it to mercury contaminated steam, or discharge it at a much higher temperature... all in order to inefficiently cool buildings to the temperature of lake michigan, a stone's throw away from the power plant. Can I burn some karma points with a duh here? Canadian industry finally cops onto an idea that every 7-year-old has when his toes are in 40F degree water and his head in 100F air. If only American industry wern't so hung up on our industrial past, we could see the way to the future.

    9. Re:Environmental effects by dead+sun · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes, or we can stop bashing people trying to make technical processes understandable to Joe Schmoe...

      Here's a novel idea. How about we educate Joe Schmoe so he doesn't go around thinking completely backwards. If everybody were smart to a certain minimum level our engineers could stop trying to make a technical process understandable by explaining it either (a) incorrectly to the level of being the opposite of what is true, or (b) as though it were magic.

      I realize Joe Schmoe would like nothing more than to sit back and watch his TV absorb darkness, but people commonly recognize that it actually emits light. If they can grasp that then they can grasp that the colder water is taking energy from the warmer water with a little effort.

      --
      If not now, when?
  2. Nice :) by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the kind of stuff I like to see :)

    Ok, it costs a lot of money, but in the long run it has the possibility to save so much more than money: the enviroment.

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  3. This is what renewables are about by T.Hobbes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For me, at least, this is what renewables should be about: finding a local source of economical renewable energy, and applying the appropriate technology to make it useful. The key thing, though, is that the methods change depending on what's availible locally.

  4. Re:Actually, water DOES flow down hill by gowen · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The scematic does not show the back half of the municipal system (sewer and waste water treatment).
    Well, yes, it does. Eventually. But by that time, the heat it gained in the exchangers has long been dissipated, so it's irrelevant. Waste water from this source will be no warmer than the waste water that was previously reaching Lake Ontario.
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  5. Re:The lake WILL warm up by mbourgon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, the point is that environmentalists don't want alternative fuels or alternative practices. They want less technology. Less tech = less electric used. I'll probably get modded as troll or funny, but I'm serious. Wind energy is touted - until someone wants to use it (New England wind-farm fight).

    What's the alternative here? Apparently there is none, so we better just not cool those homes.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  6. I recommend you take a much needed chill pill by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if they are not putting the warmed water back into the lake, the removal of cold water will raise the average temperature of the water (as warmer surface water has more of an impact on the overall lake) and will cause the lake to get warmer. We've done enough (I'm from Toronto) to screw up the environment around this city, we should NOT be doing this!

    Yeah, the equivelent of eight extra seconds of sunlight hitting the lake will be death to the entire eco-system! Run away, run away! Burn freighters full of fuel and oil instead! (RTFA if you don't get the reference)

    Get a grip. YOU have a much bigger impact on the eco-system every day you use heat, airconditioning, refridgeration, eat, sleep, shit, work or play.

    The hydrocarbins the manufacture and use of the computer you typed your comments on probably have a larger impact on global warming than this entire project. The Canadian's approach is the smartest solution to this problem that anyone has come up with in a long time. Is it scalable to every city on the coast of that lake? No (8 seconds of sunlight is one thing, eight days equivelent would be another), but that doesn't mean we shouldn't be doing it in order to reduce the consumption of power in other areas.

    Nothing is a panacea, but this is a damn sound solution for Toronto, and they get to do it by being there first. Any overall solution to our energy, global warming, etc. problems will involve numerous clever solutions, and this project stands a good chance of being a part of that solution.

    And as for impacting the environment: 6 billion people breathing the air impact the environment. If you truly don't want to have an impact, slit your wrists. Oops, your decaying flesh will still have an impact, so you're out of luck there too. Better get used to it, because people do have an effect, and they always will. The impact of this project is benign and minimal, compared to every other public works project out there, including the sewage system in your town you probably make use of multiple times every day.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  7. Re:Convection? by Emperor+Igor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the ying and the yang of every decision. There is a side effect to everything.

    The question is whether this kind of pollution is better than the carbon dioxide/refrigerant chemicals/coal power plant pollution. It is likely the answer is "yes".

  8. Re:Just two questions by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Man, I can't believe I'm getting sucked into this moronic, paranoiac debate.

    You and me both :P.

    Just to amplify your already excellent response, the other thing people here are forgetting is that Lake Ontario isn't a closed hydrolic system. It is fed by hundreds of rivers which dump tons of sun-warmed water into the lake in summer, and which dump tons of frozen and near-freezing water into it during the winter and spring thaws.

    This input vastly outnumbers the amount of cold water the Enwave system will be extracting, along with vastly outnumbering the amount of warm water input to the lake.

    In the end, the lake will be the same as it's always been, and less air-polluting fossil fuels will be required to run the existing air conditioning systems. Looks like a win-win situation to me.

    Yaz.