Slashdot Mirror


OS Stats Removed From Google's Zeitgeist

Kelly McNeill writes "Google's Zeitgeist service is sometimes used by news sources as a resource to generate install-base (don't call it market share!), statistics for operating systems. osViews contacted Google to bring some clarity to questionable aspects of the OS statistic, to which Google said that Zeitgeist is only a fun search inquiry resource and should not be used to generate statistical information. A couple days after that inquiry, we found that Google has since removed the OS stats from the Zeitgeist service."

7 of 426 comments (clear)

  1. OS and browser stats still up on Canadian Google by rd_syringe · · Score: 4, Informative
  2. Re:What about slashdot.org statistics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They did, years ago. It was dropped, depending on whom you believe, because it served no value or because it was embarassing to show 75% Windows hits. Probably both. Slashdotted sites still report an overwhelming majority of Windows/IE hits.

  3. osViews is mine... here's the gist of the article: by oscast · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am the owner of osViews.com and the individual that submitted this slashdot post. It appears as if the article got slashdotted.

    Unfortunately, I don't have a second copy of the article otherwise I would post it here. My Slashdot summarization pretty much captured the gist of the editorial, however there is one part that should be mentioned.

    In Google's Zeitgeist statistic there was a 5% figure that represented what the OS statistic as "other". I thought that this was bizarre because the Linux and Mac statistics even combined were less than the "other" which encapsulated them all.

    I don't believe that the more obscure OSes make up a number that is larger than both Linux and mac combined. This is what prompted me to call Google to get some clarity.

    i thought that perhaps Google was doing some subdivisions within the Linux or Mac stats.

    For example, Google might have only been reporting 3% to represent the OS X installations as opposed to all Mac users and then grouped the non OS X users (Mac Pre OS X) into the aforementioned "other" category.

  4. Re:Bets are on... by the+pickle · · Score: 4, Informative

    You mean like Apple is planning to do with Spotlight in Tiger?

    p

  5. Re:Browser stats also gone by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Informative

    Konqueror allows you a per-site UserAgent string.

  6. Re:osViews is mine... here's the gist of the artic by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Google's Zeitgeist statistic there was a 5% figure that represented what the OS statistic as "other". I thought that this was bizarre because the Linux and Mac statistics even combined were less than the "other" which encapsulated them all.

    There's a large network traffic generated not by human surfers but by various bots, scanning the Web for whatever purpose. The bots often identify themselves in a strange way - a comprehensive list of their user-agents can be found here and I always thought that this is actually the majority of the mysterious "other". They are not human users of desktop OS'es, but bots running automated google searches. What do you think?

  7. Re:Browser stats also gone by AirNwater · · Score: 4, Informative

    The stats aren't gone from the canadian site. http://www.google.ca/press/zeitgeist.html