Slashdot Mirror


A Day In The Life Of A Spammer

kaip writes "Internetnews.com has a story of a spammer. The individual sends 60 million spam emails for four days worth of work and claims that one in 19 of AOL users clicks the links in his mortgage spam (this number should however be taken with a grain of salt, see rules 1 and 2). Maybe not everybody has heard of the Boulder Pledge... The article also tells how the CAN-SPAM Act, which legalises spamming, is turning the US into the spam haven of the world. Currently, 86 percent of the total spam volume is coming from the States."

5 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. My spamproofing by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 5, Informative
    I use postfix, but sendmail can do the same:
    1. reject_unknown_client is on. This means that a connecting client MUST have a reverse-dns lookup for its IP, and the resulting name MUST resolve back into that IP. This alone blocks most spammers before their client can even begin to send a message.
    2. I use xbl.spamhaus.org. This is a wonderful thing. This blocks not only any box known to spam, but also any box found to be infested by some virus, ie zombies. Once again, this stops them dead before the message even starts.
    3. In the unlikely event that they get past those hurdles, I have a homebrewed filter that watches for bogus HTML tags, since they like to intersperse bogus empty tags in the middle of words in order to foil content-based filters. This simple filter actually blocks 90% of anything that made it that far.
    4. Spamassassin. The few brave soldiers of spam that got this far rarely pass this. I leave this filter near the end because it's rather CPU intensive...
    5. Finally, a simple procmail rule: If my name isn't in the "To:" or "Cc:" line, file it as spam.
    I haven't seen a spam message in, uh, maybe a year or two?
  2. Opt in lists by mdfst13 · · Score: 3, Informative

    "the simple situation is that I don't need _any_ advertising through email"

    That's a bit draconian. I would like to be notified when Blizzard is releasing a new game or the new Glen Cook book is being released. To get this info from the web sites, I would have to poll (check regularly) the web sites. I would rather receive a notification.

    The key to this is opt in only lists. One way to do this is to make a server with your email provider that allows you to register an email as requested (bulk mail whitelist). Those can go through. Other bulk mail is prevented. There are other methods as well; that is just one example to handle both.

    The real key is no *unsolicited* email advertising. If I request it, I want to be able to see it. Frankly, if a newspaper (to get back to that example) drops off their product unrequested, I would like to be able to prosecute them for littering. Further, a newspaper includes other things besides advertising. Spam does not.

  3. Holy crap... by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 3, Informative
    Take a look at http://www.specialham.com/. I had no idea spammers were being this open. For example, check this message:

    Anyone interested in an undetected socks 4 bot for computers that you have access to? Completely undetected and self-spreads via unique methods.

    -Executable for sale only (no source)
    -Updates
    -CGI/PHP notification
    -Random Ports or user defined port.
    -EXE only

    aim: ofno
    "self-spreads via unique methods": Hello, I am selling MSDoom.VQY. Jesus Christ.

    And they're sponsored by our old friends, The Bulk Club. Can't we spread a rumour that Osama is actively funding spammers or something?

  4. Re:Our love-hate relationship with business-scum by Robmonster · · Score: 4, Informative

    6 months!!! If I had to train a filter for 6 months before it becase effective I would go insane.

    You need K9.

    http://keir.net/k9.html

    RM

    --
    I have no sig yet I must scream.
  5. Yet another content filter - move along by Skapare · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is yet another content filter. The real solution to spam will prevent my servers and bandwidth from being overloaded by spam, rather than use even more of it to to accomplish keeping it out of my mailbox. The ultimate solution is to have spammers disconnected from the internet by their ISPs, or disconnect their ISPs if the ISP continue to help spammers steal and waste the resources I pay for. You say you don't have a mail server and don't need to be worried? How much is your ISP charging you? How much is your ISP taking out their own profits to cover the costs of spam you just end up deleting?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars