Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Closest Ever Asteroid Passage Revealed

Posted by michael on from the horseshoes-and-hand-grenades dept.

tricaric writes "Another asteroid passed, last March 31st, close to the Earth. This time it was only about 2 Earth radii from the Earth. The observation have been published only a few days ago, because 'Although the observed arc is only 44 minutes, the orbit is quite determinate and, given the exceptional nature of this close approach, the object is now receiving a designation.' Check out the ORSA animation!"

17 of 52 comments (clear)

  1. You know... by Eneff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think I liked it better when I was blissfully ignorant of our impending doom.

  2. It was tiny... by Selfbain · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you read the article you can see that the asteroid was extremely small and would have broken up in the atmosphere.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    1. Re:It was tiny... by NaturePhotog · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you read the article...
      You're new here, aren't you? :-)

    2. Re:It was tiny... by snake_dad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah... but we need controversy, cover-up stories, sensationalism, doomsaying.. 't is The Internet Way!

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    3. Re:It was tiny... by OneOver137 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, but it would've made many satellite operators nervous to not have a good orbit determination. A collision in geo makes a mess and takes away much of that real estate for quite some time. Orbital traffic management for both known and 'alien' bodies such as this asteroid is a growing concern among those in the space operations business.

  3. It was only 6m in diameter -- harmless by jerde · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wouldn't it be prudent to put in the story text that the object is estimated to be only 6 meters in diameter?

    The article states that an object that size would burn up harmlessly in the atmosphere. I'm not sure if that's correct or not... a 6 meter hunk of material would probably rain at least SOME material down on the ground, but I don't know if it would make a crater.

    The point is that we didn't just narrowly escape certain doom... it was a small rock.

    - Peter

    --
    INsigNIFICANT
    1. Re:It was only 6m in diameter -- harmless by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Informative

      A six-meter rock, if it doesn't break up in the atmosphere, will make a respectable crater -- maybe even knock down a few buildings. If it does break up, the fragments won't be big enough to leave craters, but can still hit hard enough to damage buildings or kill people.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:It was only 6m in diameter -- harmless by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's roughly two really small cars or one biggun. A Volvo 240 (the new yardstick for measuring asteroids, since I happen to have one handy) is just over 5 meters long. So if it helps, think of it as a large Volvo hurtling towards us from outer space at thousands of kilometers per hour (I'll save the detailed kph comparisons for later, but a standard Volvo 240 normally tops out at between 160 and 210kph depending on the engine).

      Calculating how many Volvos there are in one Rhode Island is left as an exercise for the reader.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    3. Re:It was only 6m in diameter -- harmless by hankwang · · Score: 2, Informative
      A six-meter rock, if it doesn't break up in the atmosphere, will make a respectable crater -- maybe even knock down a few buildings.

      I'm not sure what the relative velocity of the object compared to the earth's was, but if we estimate 20 km/s and a mass of 300 tons, then the kinetic energy of this object is about 6e13 J. That is about 15 kilotons of TNT worth of kinetic energy that you have to get rid of during the 1-2 seconds it takes to cross the atmosphere. The Hiroshima bomb was about 20 kilotons. I doubt that you will get away with just a few destroyed buildings if the asteroid reaches the earth surface in one piece.

      --
      Avantslash: low-bandwidth mobile slashdot.
  4. Spoon! by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Another asteroid passed, last March 31st, close to the Earth. This time it was only about 2 Earth radii from the Earth.

    Earth! That's where I keep all my stuff!

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  5. This one's a whole lot closer.. by dreamer-of-rules · · Score: 5, Informative
    According to Earth Speeds, the Earth goes around the Sun at approximately 18.5 miles/sec, or 30 km/sec. In six hours the Earth will move 400,000 miles or 650,000 km around the sun. The radius of the Earth is roughly 4,000 miles or 6,500 km. So in six hours the Earth moves about 100 times its radius.

    Basically, this latest asteroid is a lot closer.

    --
    Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts.
  6. Misleading Headline by barakn · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "Closest Ever Asteroid Passage Revealed?"

    check out the 1972 daylight fireball. It came so close it actually skipped off the atmosphere. There are plenty of other close encounters in the literature that came well before this.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    1. Re:Misleading Headline by Begossi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right below the article there's small note explainning why it was a remarkable observation:

      "is by far the closest ever observed astrometrically." The distinction is important, because the title of "closest ever observed" probably belongs to the well documented Great Daylight Fireball of 1972. On August 10th many witnesses, including a meteor expert, saw and photographed an object of about 2004 FU162's size fly through Earth's atmosphere, traveling from south to north along the Rocky Mountains of the U.S. From military satellite data it was later determined that the object passed 58 miles (93 km.) above a point in Montana during its journey. Gary Kronk's account of this event and subsequent investigations is great reading.

      --
      Friend of the Wise, Brother of the Brave.
  7. Tunguska event by FooAtWFU · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, the Tunguska event of 1908 is a case of one of these actually hitting the planet- though I guess it doesn't qualify as a "passage".

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  8. Heisenberg / Uncertainty Principle by topher67 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So due to the Heisenberg / Uncertainty Principle it would have hit us if we had not measured its trajectory, right?

    --
    github.com/chrispollitt
  9. Maybe it would have been good if it did hit us by kippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Consider what might happen if this particular rock did hit us. 6 meters isn't enough to wipe out a city and it's unlikely that it would have hit in a populated area. Assuming that it didn't kill or hurt anyone, it might have been a good thing if it hit the ground.

    Why? Because a big, fat, headline making impact (or splash) would really catch everyone's attention. A miss just catches our (the nreds') interest for a bit. If people perceive that there is an actual threat, perhaps space exploration and planetary defense will be taken seriously for a change.

    --
    Blaze a trail to the New World
  10. That's no moon! by BoogieChile · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a bloody rock, is what that is.

    If you want to call that an asteroid, then this is also an asteroid? This was a meteor that passed right through Earth's atmosphere in 1976, with a perehelion of 58,000 metres.

    Although, I think the point here is that this is the closest observed astronomically. It's like seeing the meteor before it hits the atmosphere, I guess. Anyway, the astronomers are all in a tizzy over it, so that must be a good thing.