Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Alternatives To The INDUCE Act

Posted by timothy on from the seduce-has-a-nice-ring-to-it dept.

The Importance of writes "The INDUCE Act, which has been discussed many times previously, will likely be getting a lot more attention thanks to the recent Grokster decision. The Register of Copyrights, who thinks the Betamax decision should be overturned, is supposed to come up with a consensus fix to the current language of the bill by Sept. 7. So, various people are proposing alternative solutions to the INDUCE Act. C|Net reports on one coalition's version [PDF] [HTML]. However, there are also versions by Prof. Tim Wu [PDF] [HTML], IEEE-USA [PDF] [HTML] and Ernie Miller [HTML]." Read more below about the proposed "Don't Induce" act.

Iphtashu Fitz writes "The 'Don't Induce Act' proposes that only someone who distributes a commercial computer program that is 'specifically designed' for wide-scale piracy on digital networks could be held liable for copyright violations. The proposal includes three requirements that must be met before a software distributor can be found liable: The 'predominant' use of the program must be the mass, indiscriminate infringing redistribution of copyrighted works; the 'commercial viability of the computer program' must depend on revenue derived from piracy; and the software distributor must have 'undertaken conscious, recurring, persistent and deliberate acts' to encourage copyright infringement. No surprise that the MPAA and RIAA are opposed to this 'watered down' bill. MPAA vice president Fritz Attaway showed his organizations true colors by stating that the Don't Induce Act was so narrowly drafted it would be impossible to use it to shutter even operators of peer-to-peer networks."

3 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Induce by rokzy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it just my dialect or is the word induce almost exclusively used in the phrase "in event of... induce vomiting"?

  2. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The man responsible for inventing the Replicator -a device he claimed would end world hunger, war, natural resource reduction, etc.- was simultaneously sued by three dozen multinational corporations for a total of over 800 billion USD only minutes after plugging it in for the first time.

  3. Re:Dear Mr. Attaway by GTez · · Score: 2, Funny

    Am I reading this correctly? Your saying that the internet and other modern means of comunication has no other uses then Piracy... So Slashdot is one big piracy site?