Slashdot Mirror


Movie Playback From 1TB Holographic Disc

qorkfiend writes "Optware Corp. has announced successful playback of digital movies on a new holographic recording disc with a reflective layer. Known as the Collinear Holographic Data Storage System, the disc has a one terabyte storage capacity and one gigabyte transfer speed. The disc size is 12cm, comparable to that of a DVD and a CD."

14 of 623 comments (clear)

  1. size.. by peculiarmethod · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Since when is 12 cm the size of a DVD or CD?

    pm

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    1. Re:size.. by endeitzslash · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There are 2.54 cm/in, not 2.4.

      Sheesh.

  2. Units? by DrLudicrous · · Score: -1, Redundant

    Tsk tsk for not getting your units right. One gigabyte transfer speed? What? One gigabyte per second? Per hour? Per Martian solar year?

  3. In soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    Holograms watch you!

  4. One gigabyte transfer speed? by wizarddc · · Score: -1, Redundant

    Is that one gigabyte per second? Per hour? Per throw?

    --
    Th
  5. Re:One gigabyte? by Daverd · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Says the article, 1 GB/sec.

  6. One gigabyte transfer speed? by HtR · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Heck, even my old 300 baud modem has a "one gigabyte transfer speed", if you measure in bytes per decade.

    --
    Have you tried turning it off and on again?
  7. mod uP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    confirming 74e

  8. Re:One gigabyte? by Xeo+024 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    It's one gigabye per SECOND.

    "transfer speed of one gigabyte per second (40 times the speed of DVD)"

    Read more here.

  9. Re:so fast! by birdman17 · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Wow! You measure closet size in light minutes? Where do you live?

    12 parsecs from Kessel.

  10. Re:What about durability? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You're not talking about redundancy - you're talking about data repetition.

  11. Re:What about durability? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You're not talking about redundancy - you're talking about data repetition.

  12. Re:What about durability? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You're not talking about redundancy - you're talking about data repetition.

  13. Re:What about durability? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You're not talking about redundancy - you're talking about data repetition.