Slashdot Mirror


VoIP And Cell Phones Eroding Traditional Telecoms

Lullabye_Muse writes "Yahoo! reports that telecoms in Europe and U.S. are losing in response to people switching their home phones for cellphones and dial up to cable modems. More info on specific VoIP discussed in latter part of article. The trend seems to becoming widespread, I guess 10 years and all the old wires are gonna start to be taken down."

25 of 390 comments (clear)

  1. A land-line...? by SIGALRM · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "We saw what would happen with Voice over Internet Protocol. Rather than allow it to happen to us, we decided to embrace the technology," a BT spokesman said.
    Smart move. The discount carriers are going to ramp-up competition, and this can only be good for us, the good ol' consumer. One of these days, VoIP will come to mobile, and that will be another milestone; we'll see how the big carriers respond to that.

    I still keep my land-line operational, though... I'm beginning to wonder why.
    --
    Sigs cause cancer.
    1. Re:A land-line...? by SIGALRM · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It'll work during bad weather
      Dammit, I shouldn't have purchased that fancy 2.4GHz cordless piece of crap. Besides, it interferes w/my 802.11g and--you make a good point--doesn't provide me any extra reliability.
      --
      Sigs cause cancer.
    2. Re:A land-line...? by uberdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have two problems with the whole cable/dsl issue. The first is that (hereabouts) the only ISP I can use on the cable is the Rogers. Rogers does not permit me to run my own servers. If I had a DSL line, I would have a choice of providers which allow servers.

      The other (more important) issue is that CableInternet+Cell costs a fair penny more than DSL+Landline.

    3. Re:A land-line...? by jriskin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      900mhz is a pretty good spot for cordless. The higher frequencies tend to bounce around and get absorbed by walls and structures. People forget that bigger numbers aren't always better.

      Personally I miss the days of 3-5watt analog cell phones. Range was about 10x what the little 800mW ones we carry around today. The networks are also about 10x more crowded. The reason they went to digital in the first place was just to get more people in the same amount of spectrum...

    4. Re:A land-line...? by jdreed1024 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So if you start losing VoIP service and your modem starts cycling... be quick to report it so they can change out your device.

      Hrm, my digital phone went out. Internet too. Weird. Oh well, I'll just pick up the phone and call the cable company so ..... oh, crap.

      Enh, no big deal, I'll just dial in to the modem pool at work.
      AT&F1
      ATDT6175551234
      NO DIALTONE

      Oh, right. Crap.

      Honestly, that's the single biggest reason for me to keep my landline. Redundancy. I want the ability to dial out if cable fails. Heck, with my laptop, I can even have connectivity in a power outage (yes, I've done this before). That and one of my friends got screwed by this when his digital phone service crapped out. He was complaining about it to me over IM and the fact that he couldn't even call to report it. Yes, yes, cell phones, but cell phone reception can be pretty crappy in large apartment buildings, and that doesn't help for connectivity, since cell modems are expensive.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    5. Re:A land-line...? by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Rogers does not permit me to run my own servers
      Neither does mine, so
      1. I set apache to listen to port 8080 instead of port 80
      2. I use dyndns.org to give me between 1 and 5 free site names
      3. I set up apache to do named vhosting for each free site name
      4. I append the port# to any url, like this:
        http://myfakeservername.dyndns.org:8080
      Benefits:
      1. Faster downloading and uploading (2x the speed of Bell's fastest business adsl line) - I know, because I've got 2 Bell "extreme hispeed" business adsl lines at the office, and together they give me about the same speed I get at home with 1 cable line, at half the price.
      2. My IP never changes - whereas with the Bell adsl service, it changes (ir)regularly - some days it changes half a dozen times. I used to have the servers text my cell when the IP changes, but it was getting rediculous. So instead, I just dump important stuff on my home server.
      3. Freedom. I'm taking my dogs for a walk in a few minutes, and I'm bringing my phone. Can't do that with a land line.
      4. Staying in touch. I call my friends, family, and daughters when I'm waiting in line at the store, out, or whatever. And they can reach me any time also.
      My cell works out to about $10 more a month than a land line with the same features (and I use it a LOT more than I would ever use a land line - I've done up to 3000 minutes some months)

      My cable connection is the same price as Bell's fastest service, but the cable connection is 25% faster, and it's always 5mbs/1mbs or better - when I overshoot it, I see them throttling me back to 5mb/1mb - they have LOTS of spare capacity, whereas some days the two business ultra-hi Bell connections just crawl...

      Last month I had 160 gig of transfer on my home server, and it wasn't used THAT much. I was still able to surf, etc.

      Also, the latency is a lot less with cable - makes everything seem quicker. If we could get cable at the office, we'd dump the 2 bell lines in a minute.

    6. Re:A land-line...? by rs79 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not just you. I've lost count of how many we've tried and I swear the less you pay the better they work. Sony seems to be the worst; I did a 9 month gig at Sony and everybody there told me to avoid sony phones like the plague.

      $30 Unidens seem to work real well.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    7. Re:A land-line...? by uberdave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Cable is giving me 1.5mb/s for $55/month, but I can't run servers. DSL would give me 3mb/s for $30/month (plus $50 one time fee for a static ip address) and I can run servers. It would be a no brainer. However, despite being in the middle of one of the largest cities in the country, I can't get DSL where I live.

    8. Re:A land-line...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Remember the days of the Wester Electric wired phone? They were made until the mid to late '80s.

      They'd last 30 or 40 years. At least. And they were mostly mechanical!

      What happened? How did phone manufacturing fail to improve?

  2. Oh well... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can't say I am sorry for the companies that were once monopolies to finaly die.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  3. DSL by hlopez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wire will never bbe taken down, since they are the major source of broadband. Here in Mexico Telmex the only real tephone company has invested heavely on DSL and cable modems are virtually a thing of the past.

  4. Cringley by somethinghollow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the mean time Robert X Cringley thinks that they should turn the old lines into video streaming conduits for on-demand programming.

    Seems like a good idea, but there is no way the telcos could sit down and think of doing that. They just aren't that innovative. Otherwise, they'd have been on VoIP awhile ago.

  5. A related question.. by guacamole · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone know if one needs to pay for the phone service in order to keep DSL? I have DSL but feel like switching to cell phone for phone needs and I'd rather keep my DSL provider (worldcom)

  6. I *don't* have a landline phone anymore. by soft_guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just moved. When I was living in an area that was kind of far out of town, I did not have cell coverage at my house. Now, we just moved and we do. So, no landline phone! My wife and I just use our cell phones. Of course, we still have our old numbers which are in a different area code. That freaks people our when we order pizza.

    We used to have cable modem and used 802.11b for the past few years. Now, we have a neighbor who has a wireless network called "Linksys" with no WEP key set. So, we don't pay for internet anymore either. I suppose the day they put a wep key on it or shut it down, I will order either cable or DSL (we actually can get either where we live.)

    We still have to pay for our cell phones and for electricity, but we're saving like $200 a month without phone or broadband. (Math check: Our old cable company wouldn't sell us broadband without digitial cable and the total price was like $100 a month. Plus, phone bill including long distance since the cell phones wouldn't work from the house and all our relatives live in other states.)

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  7. Re:besides, cell phones are $$ to use by Scuff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can complain all you want about a cellphone being more expensive, The way I see it is, when I want to make a call to an out of state on my cellphone it's just a normal call, but on a landline i have to worry about per minute costs that are very high, and start being high immediately, rather than after a certain number of minutes. It's fairly easy to make a cellphone you'r only phone, just make sure your plan has enough minutes for how much you plan on using it. And if that's not enough for you, keep in mind that most companies dont use up minutes for calls to other people using the same service, not just free calls at off hours. I shut off my landline almost 2 years ago after i noticed that for the same price, my cellphone provided a lot more features, and a lot more convenience.

  8. I'm not too confident by strook · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The usual progress seems to be new technical innovations start off getting sneakily shafted by the companies that are afraid of change, and then when other companies realize they could profit, they back the innovation. Like TiVo - early on DVR technology looked like it might be squashed by content owners' legal threats, but now that DirecTV and the cable companies have realized DVRs help them make money, there's some big legal guns on the side of the good guys. (As I like to think of it, at least.)

    The problem here is that right now I get my internet access from... SBC, same as my phone company. In a better world the ISPs would have a financial incentive to back VoIP against the phone companies' objections, and there could be a huge corporate battle ending up in consumer benefit. Doesn't really work when the ISP and the phone company are one and the same.

    I guess Comcast (or your local internet-via-cable company) could start bundling VoIP with their broadband access, competing with the DSL people who already offer those bundles. Makes sense to me, although I still wish the providers of the services were different groups....

    can't think any more... brain hurts... color scheme too ugly...

    --

    "TV is great! Every New Year's I make a resolution to watch more TV." - Ann Coulter

  9. I know it's kind of pointless, but by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    has anyone here tried to establish a dialup connection over VOIP?

    Like those people who run emulators within emulators within emulators, something like this would have a pretty high geek-chic factor.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:I know it's kind of pointless, but by tzanger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yup, and it works so-so.

      You must use a codec that does not do any kind of compression or acoustic fanagling or it just won't work. I have been sending faxes in and out of our office (up to two at a time in either direction) for the last 3 months now without issue, so long as it only goes one hop to our PRI downtown. Faxes through our VOIP provider are spotty at best but we also have a Canon IR3300 fax machine as our primary fax device... they're the pickiest bitches known to the faxing industry.

  10. Voice modems by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm actually surprised that voice modems haven't become popular and that answering machine capabilities haven't become standardised on computers the way faxing has. I've had modems that worked as answering machines before over the past decade, but the software was always a third-party application that wasn't integrated with the OS like faxing, and it never became one surprisingly. I presume the main reason for this is because people would tend to have a dedicated data line for the modem and have their voice lines separate. But I also think another reason is that people tend to use the voicemail of their mobile phones now more than answering machines.

    With the popularity of broadband, dial-up modems on computers are simply becoming an option used more for faxes or for using a dial-up connection when the broadband connection is down. Macs used to support audio line-in from the modem port, but they dropped that feature for some reason, and it seems to have gone unnoticed. Having an audio line-in function for a dial-up modem would be a precursor to using it as an answering machine. One of the problems of having a fax is that people usually use a dedicated line for one rather than having the same number for both voice and fax. That's two phone bills, and there's no reason for it to be that way. I always thought that computers would merge voice, fax, and data into one phone line. But if you use a mobile phone for voicemail, then you won't be able to link it to your computer.

  11. Telecomm is dead, long live the Telecomm by hellfire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a paradigm shift, this is not the death of an industry. I've been seeing small peerings of VoIP on websites, Vonage has been leading the charge, and now I'm seeing Comcast, AT+T, MCI, and Verizon all blasting their VoIP offerings all of a sudden. The companies aren't dying, they are just switching their technology. Verizon has the DSL network and is parsing it out to all these DSL providers. Comcast has it's network. Now the othr telecomms are getting in on the act and catching up to Vonage. They know they have to join this wave or die, but of course they will join up and flourish.

    What's great about this VoIP revolution is that this frees the phone number and service from the physical network. You buy the IP first, then connect your VoIP to it. And you can switch VoIPs and keep your number. Creating layers of technology each with different tasks opens up possibilities not seen before and will be a huge boob to the customer.

    The telecomms won't be at the front, they aren't leaders, but they are never far behind. They'll charge a little more, try to buy up Vonage and the other companies, then consolidate into powerhouses again. Vonage might grow big enough to be a new telecomm, like T-Mobile and Cingular almost are.

    My prediction is that it won't be until the NEXT revolution that small companies and mom and pop telecomms pop up and provide kickass service and competition. That revolution will be long range wireless networking.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  12. Monopolies ARE bad. by xtal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most customers will benefit but soome (eg. less profitable customers in outlying areas) will lose out.

    Hahahaha! I take it you don't live in an outlying area.

    My exchange was one of the last in NORTH AMERICA to be moved off an old switch that used in band signalling. While some might understand this provided much amusement in my youth, we didn't get private lines until about 1992 if I remember right. The line quality is BAD here.

    Dispite millions? being promised and provided for broadband development in Rural areas by the Canadian government, my estimated date for DSL arrival is on a geological timeframe. Luckily, the terrain here is such I might be able to get a 802.11 link to a benevolant soul in the next year or so.

    Where do I live? About 30 minutes outside a major center. Not the middle of nowhere. Basic service is what the law says I get, and basic service is what I get.

    Here'e to hoping for the ability to get an affordable cell-based broadband connection. Two way satellite is still out of the question.

    --
    ..don't panic
  13. bits want to reach people by valmont · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The whole "last mile to the user's home" issue is very soon guna become less and less of an issue with WiMAX and WiFi.

    The city where i live just deployed free wifi internet access to most residents, with its reach to increase overtime.

    IP is insanely powerful. Bandwidth is increasing, and compression algorithms are only getting better.

    I'm looking forward to a future where all consumer-telco, cable and satellite companies will be replaced by a large multitude of ISPs.

  14. Re:Good by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and I haven't had a land line since the beginning of '03. Haven't missed it much. never seem to get telemarketers on the cell that I would've had no matter what.
    And looking at the rates for net access here... DSL: 256K: 26.00/mo. + landline: $30.00/mo. total price, 56.00/mo.
    Cable?
    3000k: 45.00/mo plus I get free basic cable...
    Hmmmm....

    --

    Shift happens. Fire it up.
  15. Tele 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is a bit of FUD about Tele 2 in this article. Actually Tele 2 is also offering broadband telephony at low costs and aren't being outdistanced at all (although I guess the Skype promotors in this article would like you to think otherwise). I use it at home and it is working perfectly.

  16. Re:Monopolies are not all bad by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the BSD fortune files:

    There were in this country two very large monopolies. The larger of the two had the following record: the Vietnam War, Watergate, double- digit inflation, fuel and energy shortages, bankrupt airlines, and the 8-cent postcard. The second was responsible for such things as the transistor, the solar cell, lasers, synthetic crystals, high fidelity stereo recording, sound motion pictures, radio astronomy, negative feedback, magnetic tape, magnetic "bubbles", electronic switching systems, microwave radio and TV relay systems, information theory, the first electrical digital computer, and the first communications satellite. Guess which one got to tell the other how to run the telephone business?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News