The Power of X
An anonymous reader writes "The license changes in the last version of Xfree86 have caused many distributions to reject the project in favor of the forked X.Org X server. As X.Org prepares to release the second version of the X.Org "monolithic" X Server (dubbed version 6.8), Ars Technica investigates the future of the X platform, as cooperation between X.Org and projects like GNOME and KDE begin to take take hold at freedesktop.org. Already host to an impressive array of projects, it appears that freedesktop.org will become the hub in which other Free Desktop projects can collaborate. Daniel Stone, release manager for freedesktop.org, gets into the details on how it's all going to work, in conjunction with freedesktop.org's upcoming platform release."
Indeed, most of the X-Windows targets would benefit from a native implementation of a windowing system -- native implementations could run something like 23-27% more efficiently because of the layers of abstraction that are currently necessary. Most people don't need internationalization and most could use a simpler interface to get the printer working.
I think there's an underlying fear to reimplement that comes from (and I hate to say it) a certain sense of elitism in juggling three or four fontservers or digging through a million XFConfig-4 lines to get TV-Out working. But perhaps the focus needs to be put back on the basics?
Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
-- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.
Is anyone fixing the fundamental resolution limit in the protocol?
...an Englishman in London.
The attraction is that a clipboard is about a BILLION times faster and easier to use than juggling files, if all you want to do is move something from app A to app B.
I can't believe this kind of stuff needs to be explained to people/geeks. WHAT PLANET ARE YOU PEOPLE FROM?!?
--
Simon