Slashdot Mirror


A Flying Leap for Cars?

pillageplunder writes "Businessweek has a story about flying cars and how they could be an actual viable thing in less than 10 years. First flying taxis, then, like the Jetsons, personal flying cars. Several are already on the board, with Honda and Toyota already having prototypes of small flying devices. Even General Electric is getting in on the deal, developing a small jet engine for Honda. So...would you buy one?"

15 of 795 comments (clear)

  1. No way in hell would I use one by An.+(Coward) · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I live in Boston. Drivers here have more than enough trouble coping with travel in two dimensions. Adding a third is a recipe for disaster.

  2. The real question... by HalB · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will we have to use use "roads" in the air, or can we go as the crow flies? (going around military installqtions and so forth.

    1. Re:The real question... by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 4, Interesting
      If it could take my 45 minute commute and turn it into a 10 minute commute, I'm all for it.

      Do we really want this? I imagine a huge number of people would respond to this situation by saying "Hey, that means I can live *anywhere* inside a 500-mile radius and still have a normal commute time!" Then they'd start looking for 5 or 10 unspoiled acres way out in the country to live on, knowing they're just a brief flight from civilization. I can imagine overwhelming economic pressure on every nature preserve anywhere near a major city to subdivide into ranchettes to meet the demand from yuppies who always wanted a country home and a city job and now find they have the means to have both.

      After flying cars become a reality, the urban sprawl that would follow would be horrific, a major environmental disaster. Imagine no more forests, just miniature estates every mile, each with a flying car parked out front, over half the land area of the country. The thought makes me shudder.

  3. We really need to find something like... by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Anti-gravity, or atleast better flotation or something.

    All the effort, fuel and pollution required just to get a hunk of metal off the ground and keep it there with the current technology is wasteful and unsustenable.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  4. Class of airplane and scams by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've always been interested in this, and followed the subject for the past couple decades. A friend has done the same since the 50s (and did classified work for the USAF with something I'm pretty sure involving planes).

    To date there are basically two classes of "flying cars" - light aircraft that look like cars and fold up to drive (similar to the Aquacar and other novelity cars), and scams like anything Moller puts out under his Skycar company.

    Moller is actually "making" real commuter flight vehicles, 400 mph, mpg roughly equal to a car, park in a garage, take off from the driveway (or helipad if the FAA never allows driveway flight). The only problem is, his test flights have been happening for decades, commercial models for sale have always been a "year or two away", and all test flights (until a couple recent ones) have all been tethered and a dozen feet above the ground.

    Unlike fusion, which is always a decade away because there needs to be a breakthough, Moller says he has it working and ready. But he's been saying that for a long, long time.

    The "planes that convert to cars" (and their cousins, one of which is mentioned in the article, "helicopters that convert to cars") have been around commercially since the 1950s, and they generally work fairly well. They aren't very efficient, but they fly, drive and a new model comes out from somebody every five years or so (until the chilling effect from lawsuits slowed small aircraft production recently).

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  5. Never Happen by NtroP · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It takes me a good 15 - 20 minutes to properly preflight my plane before I take off. This is to make damn sure that it is in perfect running condition. If anything is not right I don't go.

    On the other hand, I hop right into my mercedez and take off for work. If something does't feel right or sound right or if I am really low on gas, I figure "hey I'd better do something about that sometime soon", and drive off. I can always pull to the side of the road. I can't do that in my plane. If something goes wrong and I need to "pull to the side of the road" I'm in a bit of a pinch. I have a ballistic parachute installed but I'd really hate to have to use it.

    I can't ever imagine what flying would be like if everyone just hopped into their flying cars and took off (after cocktails, in a hurry, low on gas, in a poorly maintained vehicle, without a license, in bad weather, etc). What a nightmare!

    Don't get me wrong, I think flying is wonderfull and that everyone should be able to do it, after rigorous training and certification, in a well maintained vehicle, clearly understanding when conditions are right to fly!

    --
    "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
  6. Re:Exactly by tigersha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What do you think are the chances that some redneck is not going to take out that autopilot and replace it with a aftermarket hotrod conversion?

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  7. Another hitch by m.h.2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's something I have yet seen mentioned: What about law enforcement? Unless the cops have these, I don't see how they'll let the general population drive them. It'll be pretty difficult for a cop in a standard cruiser to pull you over if you can just lift off and escape him. Even with radios and helicopters, by the time they can dispatch a chopper, you could be outta there.

  8. Re:Exactly by linzeal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Very low, as methods of detecting deviations from flight paths will immediately notify authorities if they do not correspond to what was issued. There may be some places over water that they could do it. I would presume that is where drag racing like activities would take off.

  9. Flying cars = rural revival by boatboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I believe there will be a reversal of urbanization if & when fast, efficient long distance trasportation comes to market. Many people- myself included- prefer lots of space, but live in the city or suburban areas because they like being close to things like grocery stores, friends, church, etc. The faster you can get to these places, the further away you can live from them.

    May not seem that profound, until you consider things like the last election map. An exodus from the city would no doubt have interesting social consequences.

  10. what about personal dirigibles? by Phoenix666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    anyone out there with the specs handy for how much helium/hydrogen(if you like to live dangerously) it would take to lift one 250 lb. person? i think it would be much cooler to have traffic floating around instead of the blast of a jet engine every morning when the neighbor takes off for work.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  11. It will be just fine folks by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't believe the ignorance and ludditism I'm seeing here on slashdot. You would think this website was frequented by a congregation of the Amish, rather than self-proclaimed technophiles.

    Your post is a breath of fresh air, being at least thoughtful (if perhaps not fully informed). Your point that pilot's licenses are far more difficult and rigorous than drivers licenses is a good one.

    It's still a lot harder to get a license for and rental of a small aircraft than a car.

    To get a driver's license in the United States, the chief requirement seems to be a pulse. To rent a car, you need a credit card in addition to the pulse.

    Pilot's licenses--for good reason--are more difficult to get.


    However, while "they" may call these new aircraft "flying cars," and these aircraft may even become easier to fly than current cars are to drive, I suspect one will be required to have a pilot's license to fly these aircraft just as one must have to fly any other aircraft. And well one should ... if the automatics crap out for whatever reason one should be competent enough to pilot the device safely to the ground without hand-holding.

    As a pilot I would love to have a flying car. Being able to get from driveway to driveway in one vehicle, rather than taking a car to the airport, flying the plane to my destination, and then renting/borrowing a car at the far end (many FBOs have courtesy cars, but many do not, and getting one is always a crapshoot), would be a tremendous boon.

    Let those who want to pilot flying cars jump through the necessary hoops to become competent pilots (ideally with an instrument rating), while those who get regular drivers licenses remain restricted to the planet's surface.

    All the benefits of flying vehicles, all the air safety of the current licensing system, and additional flexibility for those who do like to travel and are willing to acquire the skills to fly.

    As for the post wondering what to do if one has a midair in one county and plumets to the earth in another, that one is easy. The NTSB investigates the crash irrespective of where it lands (in the US). WRT international borders, the current norms for investigative aeronautical crashes would apply.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  12. Blade Runner:Only The Police Will Have Flying Cars by Mad+Man · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Re: Another hitch (Score:4, Interesting)

    Here's something I have yet seen mentioned: What about law enforcement? Unless the cops have these, I don't see how they'll let the general population drive them. It'll be pretty difficult for a cop in a standard cruiser to pull you over if you can just lift off and escape him. Even with radios and helicopters, by the time they can dispatch a chopper, you could be outta there.


    Here's another possibility:

    When the flying cars first come out, they will probably be limited to law enforcement (and important government officials and their connected friends/donors, of course). After all, if only the police should have guns, why should anyone else be trusted with potential flying bombs?

    After a while, a whole generation will grow up in a world where flying cars are exclusively limited to the government, and the "right" to own one will never trickle down to us peons.

    Besides, how many civilian flying cars did you see in Blade Runner ? "You know the score; if you're not a cop, you're little people."
  13. No, not under my window by rcastro0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As someone living in one of the largest cities in the world (São Paulo, Brazil), in an eight-floor apartment and with recently bought sound insulating windows, my only concern is: How much noise do these creatures produce ? I don't want anyone flying under my window at 3am in the morning and waking me up.

    Now, small blimps with eletric motors, that would be OK.

    --
    Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
  14. Re:SUVs by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are many differences between air congestion and ground congestion. You don't have to worry about accidents in the air closing off lanes or slowing down traffic. You don't have to worry about construction closing a lane. You don't have to worry about squeezing four lanes of traffic down to one lane to go over a 45 mph bridge. You don't have to get on the arterial with everybody else just to get on a different arterial. And finally, if things get too congested at 100 feet, rise to 150 feet and go over it.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju