Slashdot Mirror


Blade Runner Is The Best Sci-Fi Film

Delchanat writes "Now there's scientific proof: according to 60 of the most influential scientists in the world, including British biologist Richard Dawkins and Canadian psychologist Steven Pinker, Ridley Scott's Blade Runner (1982) is the best science fiction film. Late Mr. Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) finished 2nd, followed by George Lucas' Star Wars (1977) and The Empire Strikes Back (1980)." There are several other stories as well: favorite authors, the basics of science fiction, and an excerpt of a new Iain M. Banks novel.

6 of 972 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Non sequitur by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'd read the book twice, knew exactly what was going on, and still found the movie to be a total waste of time.

  2. um by jafac · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yes.
    it is.
    No doubt.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  3. Does anyone get the feeling... by character_assassin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    that this "survey" of the best science-fiction movies was specifically created to generate a high-postcount Slashdot thread?

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
  4. Bad choice by Satertek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Man...Blade Runner was on last night on Spike but I watched Event Horizon on SciFi instead...I'd never seen either, but Event Horizon was OK.

  5. #1 work of human art of all time - AKIRA (manga) by evilmousse · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...possibly the illiad & oddyessy.
    but i like akira.

    the 6-compendium set is page after page of ultra-detailed cityscapes, and sits a little higher than a foot when stacked end to end. it's an epic operettic masterpeice with strong classic 'noh' theatre themes; unfolding a tail of decay & rebirth, (imho) very accurately depicting different kinds of power struggles as society is broken by cataclysm. The scope of the story is unbeleivably broad and deep, comparable to the massive character development I see in Greek classics. As far as sci-fi goes, I beleive its' most accurate trait is in its' psychology; the science in the story is heavily eastern in nature, which is a pleasing difference from most the sci-fi I know, based in western science.

    The movie is pleasing but choppy.. like what would happen if you tried to condense a three-day long norse opera into an hour.

    -g

  6. Re:Did you read the book? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Every time I look at a circle I wonder if there's a hidden message in the simple beauty of the shape...


    You're just asking for a link to Goatse

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.