Slashdot Mirror


Video Games Hit The Big Screen

Anonymous Coward writes "A movie theatre owner in Logan, Utah is hoping to start a new trend by bringing video games (Halo in this case) to the big screen. The local newspaper in Logan, The Herald Journal has a nice write-up about the success they had. Does anyone else think this could catch on to be successful, especially in college towns?"

19 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. Uhhh... by agraupe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not sure if it's ever been something you can pay for, but the local Famous Players (big Canadian theatre chain) was advertising a Halo 2 fest with ten friends if you entered and won some sort of contest. That being said, I'd be more likely to pay 8.00 for a massive two-hour Halo deathmatch than a boring movie.

  2. Re:But... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With your numbers, if it costs the theater $5 per person in royalties to play a movie, they come out ahead assuming the same number of people would show up either way.

  3. Re:But... by csimicah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's during a time when the theatre would otherwise be idle... assuming the licensing fees weren't too high, it's found money.

  4. I did this by magefile · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At UMich Ann Arbor. With Super Smash Bros. and a few dozen others.

  5. Re:But... by DeepRedux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the key is that "tournaments are scheduled for Friday nights at midnight". If this were at 8pm, I would not see how it would pay the theater better than a showing a movie. But by midnight they need a special event to get any kind of a crowd.

  6. Yeah by fredopalus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even better:
    Video games on the IMax.

    Can you imagine playing Rogue Leader on a screen that size?!

    That would be one awesome dog fight!

    --
    Jonahweb.com has stuff.
  7. Duping Is Not Flaming by Rie+Beam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are all posts pointing out that this is a dupe getting modded flamebait?

  8. Re:Actually been done... by josh3736 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    But that was in the days where you could measure the game's pixels on the theater's screen with a ruler. With today's high-res games, it would be more entertaining.

    Not to mention that in 1993, it was mostly only kids with (a) no car and (b) no cash who played Nintendo. Now you have gamers that can drive themselves to the theater and plop down a few bucks.

  9. Yes by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does anyone else think this could catch on to be successful, especially in college towns?

    Yes, but only if there is beer provided. Pizza also a plus.

  10. Why I didn't renew my subscription. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is why I didn't renew my /. subscription.

    http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/19/ 164257&tid=127&tid=211

  11. I should have mentioned... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    .. I hate replying to my own post.

    The cinema really makes a killing on selling the candy. $3 cokes and $4 packs of salted and sweet snacks go a long way to stuffing the coffers of your local cinema outlet. The movies themselves are almost just a vehicle to sell junk food.

    Film distributors are greedy, soul sapping bastards. If the candy bar didn't pull in an extra $10 or so per consumer here at my local cinema the place would be really scrounging for cash.

    1. Re:I should have mentioned... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Am I a soul sapping bastard for denying them their revenue on tickters subsidized by candy bar food?

      No, but you're not a film distribution company, are you?

      I don't agree with the way things are, but if the cinema doesn't agree to the distributors terms, they don't get movies. If they don't get movies, they don't make _any_ money.

      It's similar bully tactics to the **AA, except it's been going on even longer and it's just taken for granted as part of doing business.

  12. Re:hold up. by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And you think that going to a movie theater and either playing or watching other people play video games is socialiizing? (There might be a 12-step program for this, you know.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  13. Re:hold up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't really like to pay $8.50 to see a two hour movie, I definately don't want to pay that much to watch some geek play one of the most repetitive games of the modern era in public. Other than splitscreen, it's not like you can really do multiplayer. Then, the quality would be abhorent with the low resolutions.

  14. Re:hold up. by jackbird · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um, once upon a time there were these things called "arcades." They were very very sunlight free, often filled with smoke, and, while crowded, had very little socializing going on. They were pretty cool.

  15. Re:hold up. by Tongo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone else think that all these hardcore gamers are vampires gaming among us?

  16. Two words by Krunch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    LAN party

    --
    No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
  17. Video games are performance art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The players make the game, not the rules.

  18. Re:IMAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The resolution on the IMAX is phenominal, I can't see how they could get even a modern computer game running with a crisp screen.