Slashdot Mirror


Secret Chamber In The Great Pyramid?

ferkelparade writes "The Guardian reports that two French amateur archaeologists believe they have located a secret chamber in the Cheops pyramid using microgravimetry and radar. The team believes that this might be the pharaoh's burial chamber - as the chamber seems to be unopened, it might still house the complete burial treasure. More coverage from abc."

29 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. Be careful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I saw a documentary just a few weeks ago about the hidden dangers of secret pyramid chambers. Walls can start shifting around for no reason and for God's sake stay the hell away from any pod-shaped living structures attached to the ground!

    1. Re:Be careful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      One thing they should look out for are giant ring-like structures. These devices, according to one documentary I saw, are examples of how technologically advanced the Egyptians were and were part of an elaborate transportation system where people could go some fairly great distances at speed.

    2. Re:Be careful! by GTRacer · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hidden dangers indeed! If they find what looks like a deck of playing cards, they should probably put them back in the box and leave them alone...

      GTRacer
      - Sorry, my son has got me into the game of the King of Games

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  2. Unfortunately... by keiferb · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's behind a small door, so the robot can't get in.

  3. Archaeologist... Grave robber.... by menscher · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What's the difference? Just a few thousand years?

    I really start to wonder about disturbing the graves of others. I guess the fact that they aren't from a current religion means they don't deserve respect, right?

    1. Re:Archaeologist... Grave robber.... by Tickenest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For what it's worth, a grave robber wants to loot the objects in the grave to make money.

      An archaeologist seeks knowledge. Now, yes, his actions can lead to fame and fortune, but that isn't (shouldn't) be his primary goal (and it almost always isn't.)

      And I think that that's worth a lot.

      --
      This is the NFL, which stands for "Not For Long" if you keep making those bulls*** calls.
    2. Re:Archaeologist... Grave robber.... by Holi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Trying to open a pharoh's grave site is not going to advance our knowledge much. We know about as much as we are going to about the ancient Egyptian culture. So this is more a treasure hunting expedition then a pursuit of knowledge. It's cool how the did it, but high tech grave robbing is still grave robbing.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:Archaeologist... Grave robber.... by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Funny


      An archaeologist seeks knowledge

      ...and then sells the rights to the official opening to TV.

    4. Re:Archaeologist... Grave robber.... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, some archaeologists seek ancient treasures to defeat Nazis with!

    5. Re:Archaeologist... Grave robber.... by Dread_ed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Furthermore...

      I would think that a long dead king would be pleased by the thought of having his name and burial site discussed all over the world thousands of years after his death. Lump in the increased population, the television coverage, and newspapers and knowledge of him would likely be many orders of magnatude more now than when he was alive.

      If someone had discribed the phenomena that surrounds the pyramids today to the pharos in the past I would think that the more megalomaniacal would find that sufficient reason to create the pyramids, regardless of the religious ramifications. Amazing feats of architecture and megalithic construction, secret chambers with undiscovered riches, and mysterious curses will do alot to keep your name in circulation over the ages. Putting these things into the pyramids is like serving notice on the future that you were there first and best.

      You know, kind of like a inter-temporal multi-millenial easter egg.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    6. Re:Archaeologist... Grave robber.... by RsG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "We know as much as we're going to"? That, my friend is a logical fallacy. With any sort of scientific investigation, there is no convienient last page to tell you that you've reached the end. Now, granted, we certainly are looking at diminishing returns; I doubt that there are revolutionary breakthroughs in our understanding of ancient Eqypt waiting behind that door. The _important_ discoveries have _probably_ already been made. But we don't know for sure.

      Now I will grant that there is a fine line between grave robbery and exploration. But ask yourself: do you object to grave robbery because it's vandalism and theft, do you object becasue it's disrespectful of the dead, or do you object on religious grounds? If it's the first reason, then really any expediton mounted for scientific gain doesn't merit objection. If you think it's disrespectful, bear in mind that these tombs are _ancient_. You have to draw the line somewhere, and these dead are long forgotton. If it's a religious objection then thats another matter, but not everyone will agree with you on this one.

      Anyway which is worse: letting ancient Egypt be forgotton, or studying what remains of it? I'm sure that we wouldn't mind our graveyards being studied by future generations in three thousand years time, in fact we'd probably want to be remembered.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    7. Re:Archaeologist... Grave robber.... by RsG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or get crushed by giant rolling balls in the proccess of trying.

      (Hey, at least they aren't gaint bouncing balls)!

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    8. Re:Archaeologist... Grave robber.... by Reducer2001 · · Score: 2

      Fortune and glory, kid.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    9. Re:Archaeologist... Grave robber.... by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. I think Hancock's answers are probably full of bologna, but the elements leading up to those conclusions are fascinating. Like the drilling process used to hollow out the sarcophagi and the 15th century maps of antarctica so on.

      Interesting stuff. There may never have been an Atlantis, and aliens certainly didn't build anything, but there's a hell of a lot of absolutely LOST and intentionally destroyed human history.

      I think it's our duty to explore this stuff.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    10. Re:Archaeologist... Grave robber.... by tigersha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If we destroy ourselves for the next 50000 years our descentdant archeaologists will find our detritus. Transistor radios. TV's. Silicon chips. Large factories. Machines. Mines. Bridges. Skyscrapers.

      We have not found ANYTHING of that sort that predates us here on earth. Guess why. Maybe because they were not there?

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  4. What do they find? by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it the Ark of the Covenants?

    Is it the Holy Grail?

    No; they find an even rarer, more legendary, and more precious treasure.

  5. Re:Don't open it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Okay. Two words I don't like right off the bat: tomb and unearthed. People, you've got to leave your tombs earthed! -- Cordelia

  6. How did they measure in the first place? by macz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If, as the story says, they are being denied access to the site on the grounds that they are not professional Egyptologists, how did they find out all of the information they base their theory on?
    Did they use some Star Trek Sensor array from high above the surface of the earth?

    --
    ...But I digress. TREMBLE PUNY HUMANS!ONE DAY MY SPECIES WILL DESTROY YOU ALL!
    1. Re:How did they measure in the first place? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pretty darn close- they used georadar and mass (microgravity) detectors. The "site" in question seems to be quite a ways up the pyramid, just under the Queen's chamber- and they'd need permission fot that.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  7. Finally by nes11 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's about time we find that other dialing device.

  8. Can you blame them? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But the French researchers are being denied access to the pyramid to test their theory.

    Well, given that numerous cultural sites have been desecrated and priceless Egyptian artifacts have been stolen from Egypt by European and Egyptian "researchers" over the last couple centuries (and millenia), can you blame the Egyptian officals?

    If the French researchers really want access to the pyramids, maybe they can petition the French, British and other governments to return some of the artifacts as a sign of good will.

    Hey, scientific progress is great, but so is maintaining your cultural heritage.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:Can you blame them? by araczynski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with you, but i think their real motives are the fact that they don't want 'outsiders' to discover anything, but do it themselves. Or perhaps at least ask for more funding from outside resources so they can pursue this further... The egyptians (in charge) care about their culture about as much as the Iraqis who robbed their own museums during the initial mess.

      --
      sigs suck
    2. Re:Can you blame them? by 't+is+DjiM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, France, England etc. once colonized or conquered Egypt. At the time, it was very common to import artifacts of the newly conquered lands to the home country. Some countries even exposed the local (uncivilised) people of their newly conquered territories.

      Instead of taking a picture of an obelisk, you would just take the obelisk with you (the obelisk on the "place de la concorde" in paris is an original specimen brought by Napoleon on his Egyptian campaign) to be able to show your mom where it was you were.

      In my opinion, those "stolen" atrifacts have contributed much much more to mankind and science than they would possibly have could while buried in a grave...

      --
      --Use ant to make .war
  9. Good Point by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And I'd like to add to it, if only a little. The knowledge that an archaeologist seeks is not simply for himself, but for the greater interest and good of mankind. It sounds high-handed and trite, I know, but it's the truth. In fact, most archaeologists (and historians in general) act much like the Open Source community does: They share information as if it were a responsibility to do so, and make their goal the discovery of new information to be shared and/or the reinterpretation of old information which would reveal new information. (I hope that wasn't too confusing.)

    For what it's worth, most archeological artifacts end up in museums and the protective-but-publicly-accessable vaults (though you sometimes need a reason better than "I just wanted to find out if any Joanne Schmoe can look at ancient pottery shards"), rather than in private collections and on the auction block. For the archaeologist (and, again, historians in general), knowledge alone is its own treasure.

    ~UP

    [Note: To establish my own credibility on this subject, I submit that I am a student and History Major at a university noted within academic circles for its history department; just as an example of this, we had a visiting professor, last year, who was one of the top five asian-history historians on the planet.]

    --
    Eat the Path.
  10. Re:Not if it kills you by Dread_ed · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This brings up the question of whether or not everyone, specifically the pharos themselves, actually believed 100% in the religion of the day.

    Did you ever wonder if there was a pharoh that was uneasy at the thought of having their body put through the embalming process? What with their brains being pulled out of their nose and their organs being put into jars I would expect that some of them were not to excited about the prospect.

    The ancient Egypitans also believed that the pharohs were gods. It was central to their religion. I think that *maybe* the pharohs themselves knew whether or not they were actually gods, and this knowledge might have had some bearing on their perception of their religious beliefs.

    Not to mention marrying and having sex with their sisters. I bet that some pharohs were kind of upset about that, but did it anyways because it was not only expected, but required to make sure that the power system continued to function. The believers knew that this was proper according to the religion and it would be improper to change it, possible weakening the strength of the pharoh who tried to do it. Fear of the population's reaction to violating their belief system could have been a motivator, as easily as the actual belief itself.

    Also, I find it strange that with the current climate of acceptable atheism and self directed spiurituality that varys wildly from person to person as a cultural refrence point that almost everyone seems to have the impression that past cultures' populations were all 100% believers, completely succeptible to religious indoctrination.

    These are the cultural archaelogy questions that may (probably will not) ever be answered. Pity too, because what REALLY caused people to act in a certain manner is infinitely more interesting to me than the plausible or probably answer.

    --
    When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  11. Re:Not if it kills you by Bastian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If we can get our hands on enough documents from a given culture it gets easier to figure these things out. If I recall right, we know that the Golden Age Greeks didn't really believe any of their mythology, even if they did believe in their gods, which is what you'd expect from such a scientifically-minded culture. Sort of like how most modern-day Christians don't really think that Hell is a physical place in the way it is described in the Bible and would be pretty skeptical if the evening news were to claim that a man was enervated by a haircut.

  12. Belzoni used Dynamite to enter this pyramid by jimbro2k · · Score: 3, Informative

    A former circus strongman and giant, turned egyptologist, Giovanni Battista was the first to enter the sarcophagus chamber in modern times. I've been there: he left his graffiti still very visible in big black letters on the wall of the inner chamber, a foot high: "Belzoni 1818". He opened a number of other tombs as well. His favorite tool was dynamite.

    --
    There is not nearly enough love in the world, but there is far too much trust.
  13. right or wrong... by kendoka · · Score: 2, Funny

    why are we bickering about whether it's for knowledge or fame or fortune? Everybody knows in the end, boys just want their mummy. =)

  14. Microgravimetry by TeaQuaffer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was not familiar with microgravimetry. The Federal Highway Administration has an article on using it to find old mines

    It looks like basicaly you use Newton's law of gravatation to measure the local density of the earth, and just look around for a dip.

    Microgravimetry is also used in the study of thin films

    --
    Sola Deo Gloria!