Slashdot Mirror


Implications Of The Recent Hash Function Attacks

An anonymous reader writes "Cryptography Research has issued a Q&A that explains the security implications of the hash function collision attacks recently announced at CRYPTO 2004. Apparently the consequences can be catastrophic for certain kinds of code signing and digital signatures, but MD5 sums for checking binaries are (mostly) OK. While the speculation that SHA-1 is about to fail seems to be overblown, updating the many legacy systems and protocols that rely on MD5 is going to be a massive undertaking."

7 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. fristage postage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    belongs to GNAA

    1. Re:fristage postage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      klaimed for Trollkore

  2. Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Do it later.

  3. what rush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    don't see no rush...

  4. ah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    fp!

  5. Smashing Hashing by l4m3z0r · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Smashing Hashing, Hashing Smashing... My nursery school taunt in the face of such a discovery has left me with a sour taste in my mouth, and also a horrible lisp that I seem unable to shake.

  6. really now by Guano_Jim · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Is there anything better than hash?