Slashdot Mirror


The End of Encryption?

An anonymous reader writes "The encryption algorithms that make virtually all electronic commerce possible work only because certain mathematical problems are very, very hard to solve. But some mathematicians are trying to prove that there's really no difference between 'hard' and 'not hard' problems--known in the math biz as P and NP. In an article on TechnologyReview.com, Simson Garfinkel spells out the real-world consequences of this mathematical conundrum."

3 of 633 comments (clear)

  1. fuck jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    LOL
    JEWS DID WTC
    lol
    jews
    jews hit wtc
    jews is dead to me

  2. P and NP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    P and NP as "news for nerds"? What's next? Slashdot headlines announcing "a so-called 'digital' replacement for Babbage's analytical engine"?

    Who's the arts major who submitted this. Yeah, you in the back. Give me that geek badge right now.

  3. Wow - Where is MIT's Fact checker by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I am completely befuddled as to how this article could be posted by MIT, wild inaccuracies (several weeks for a 40 bit key ??? how about a few hours for a 56 bit key) and their description of P vs NP is horrible

    Note I made absolutely no comment on how this made it into Slashdot - it is poorly written, inflamitory, and accurate enough that a novice in the field will take it as accurate. Perfect for Slashdot

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them