Slashdot Mirror


Internet2 Speed Record Broken

RevKa writes "InternetNews.com has a report of a new Internet2 land-speed record. The old record was nearly cut in half: the two parties, California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), 'transferred 859 gigabytes of data in less than 17 minutes.' InternetNews goes on to say, 'This record speed of 6.63Gbps is equivalent to transferring a full-length DVD movie in four seconds.' Various scientific purposes were mentioned 'as well as commercial applications from entertainment to oil and gas exploration.' The article ended with hardware specs 'S2io's Xframe 10 GbE server adapter, Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Newisys 4300 servers using AMD Opteron processors, Itanium servers and the 64-bit version of Windows Server 2003.'"

16 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. This sounds great! by jkrise · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most desktops don't have that much bandwith on their FSB!!

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:This sounds great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes they have. Even the Pentium III had 8.5Gbps of FSB bandwidth. Pentium 4 has 51.2Gbps of FSB and memory bandwidth.

    2. Re:This sounds great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well... Let's see, an LTO-2 drive can spool at 35GBps (that's bytes not bits) a StorageTek L700 can house 20 of them, that's 700GBps (which is approx 5600Gbps) your LTO-2 tape can store 200Gb native, err... I'm getting boared with the maths now, but you get the idea...

    3. Re:This sounds great! by afidel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ERROR: Order of magnitude problem
      With a transfer rate of 60 MB/sec, the Ultrium 460 is the ideal choice for enterprise-class data protection needs. linky

      So, real numbers are max 1.2GB/s or 12Gb/s for the L700, not bad, but not that much faster than this transfer. And with the tapes you still have to transport them to the destination to make the comparison fair.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  2. Oh-oh. by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 2, Interesting
    'This record speed of 6.63Gbps is equivalent to transferring a full-length DVD movie in four seconds.'

    Explaining it like that is likely to draw the wrong sort of attention - How long until Jack Valenti and his crew of RIAA/MPAA thugs descend on this new menace to their livelihoods?

    Incidentally, for some reason gmail has decided to give me 12 invites - they will go to the first 12 logged in posters telling a funny joke involving ESR or RMS, bonus points for use of ASCII.

    --

    Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

    1. Re:Oh-oh. by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Incidentally, for some reason gmail has decided to give me 12 invites - they will go to the first 12 logged in posters telling a funny joke involving ESR or RMS, bonus points for use of ASCII.

      I think gmail must have just hit some kind of critical density; I finally got my invite last week, and since then I've been seeing them offered just about everywhere.

      That's exponential growth for you, though... I've invited three people in myself already, and I imagine they've got invites of their own by now. I doubt Google will ever need to officially open gmail to the general public; in a couple of months the number of invites in circulation will probably exceed six billion :-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Oh-oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They're growing in stages. For perhaps the last 2 months almost NOBODY I knew with a gmail account had invites to give away. Now within say, the last 4 days we all have loads.

      They're ready for the next step up in users, I'd guess.

  3. Interesting point... by Noryungi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is straight from the article:

    Internet2 is fast -- Abilene, a U.S. cross-country backbone network, blasts data at 10Gbps. But transoceanic networking is another story. There are hardware and software issues to overcome, Gray said.

    For example, one limiting factor is that the fastest available interface for PCs is the PCIX64 Bus Isolation Extender, which can only handle 7.5Gbps.

    So... Let me get this straight... The problem these guys have is that they are using PC to connect to, and send data on, Internet2?

    I remember a time when "serious" CS researchers would not touch a PC with a ten-feet pole. Times have changed, indeed.

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Interesting point... by mbbac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Would a Next Cube be considered a PC? I would, because it's present day brother would be my PowerMac G5. And a Next Cube is the PC that Tim Berners-Lee used when developing the Web.

      --

      mbbac

  4. NOT Speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is my pet peeve...

    This is NOT a measure of SPEED, but of FLOW RATE!!!

  5. Re:Windoze?? by melkorainur · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article doesn't seem to say what protocol was used. I was hoping to find out if it was TCP or TCP based like iSCSI or something lower level. If it's lower level. The second thing is about the s2io card. I'd like to know if it has true TCP offload capability like stateful packet handling and processing, ie: strip headers off at NIC level and dma to host memory. Even S2IO's site doesn't elaborate on that. Anyone know?

  6. Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes by Gunzour · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From a business perspective, think of how this could change distribution. Instead of having to ship DVDs to your local Blockbuster, Blockbuster could have their stores hooked up to the net and just download the DVD's their customers request.

    "Oh, no more copies of Passion of the Christ on the shelf? Hang on a couple of minutes while I burn one for you..."

  7. Re:wow by qray · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Definitely beneficial! We could take Tribes 2 or Quake, or the like and build entire simulated armies. Instead of actually killing people we could simulate wars and just abide by the results.

    And you thought computer games were bad. They may save us from extinction.

  8. Re:Achieving equivalent Disk I/O by julesh · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What kind of equipment is needed to achieve the necessary Disk I/O to match the network throughput?

    I suspect that a 16 disk RAID 0 array of high speed disks could keep up with this. However, I think you'd need a pretty specialised computer system to keep up with such an array. I'm not sure what kind of architecture you'd need, but I am convinced it would involve multiple I/O buses and some kind of crossbar arrangement for shared access between DMA controllers. Memory would have to be interleaved carefully also.

    Chances are they were transferring localhost:/dev/zero to remote:/dev/null.

  9. Re:wow by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Parallel computing is the forseeable future of computing. If you have sufficient bandwidth across the internet, it only makes sense to share computing resources between people. Just think about how it could help gentoo users :)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. What about Latency? by closms · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree that bandwidth is great, but applications like distributed file systems are much more sensitive to high latency. Any stats on Internet2 latency?