Slashdot Mirror
Cold Fusion Back From The Dead
misterfusion writes "Looks like the IEEE is warming up to cold fusion with the latest story "Cold Fusion Back from the Dead". This has been a good year for this field with several leading science journals (Physics Today, MIT Technology Review, etc) contributing stories. Things are warming up and if science Research & Development funding can be stimulated with a positive DoE report (due soon), it might be an interesting rebirth."
mercatur is a republican slut
www.mercatur.net
plz do not let me fail this
...and there will be quite a power source from the cold stares of liberals and the spinning of forefathers.
slashdotters just loved sites endowed with Macromedia products, especially Shockwave & Flash.
But The Saint was such a crappy movie. Note: The Cold Fusion Formula was on cards in her bra.
For a minute I was afraid the story was about the "programming language" Cold Fusion, which Macromedia seems to have killed. Complain all you want about Flash/Shockwave, but I will be eternally grateful to MM if they really have done away with CF once and for all.
this is getting old and so are you
blog
>>Except for ending slavery, fascism, nazism and communism, WAR HAS NEVER SOLVED ANYTHING
Actually Fascism, Nazism, Communism still exsit, it's just that they are a shadow of their former selves.
Communism -- China, Cuba,- Russia fell because because they over extended themselves money-wise.
Slavery is still practiced today. It's just not out in the open anymore.
Fascism, and Nazism are just shadows of themselves, but still exsit, just like the KKK.
War doesn't solve anything, all it can do is breakup the probelm, which helps to mitigate, and minimize the probelm. But the probelm doesn't go away. hence the WAR on drugs means you still can buy drugs. The War on Terrorism will be fought the same way as the war on drugs.
You need to change people through knowledge and understanding, not by force. Force only works for a little while.
i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
I use Cold Fusion every day. I like it a lot.
Cold Fusion was supposed to drown under the ASP tidal wave. Then PHP was the obvious answer. Both products are free, and that was always cited as the reason that Cold Fusion would die.
CF has reach a point of decline- which is okay- but it's not dead.
I am willing to challenge anyone out there- if we are both given the same criteria for building a dynamic site- I'll use Cold Fusion, you can use PHP, ASP, JSP, whatever. I'll have my site done first. It will be secure, scalable, fast, and easily maintained. I've built dozens and dozens of sites that get moderate to heavy use (depending on your point of reference...) and Cold Fusion has never been an impediment, frequently it was the saving grace- allowing the project to get done on-time.
People love to bash CF, because it is not the language du jour. It costs money- some people don't like that. It USED to be that a lot of crappy little projects were started in Cold Fusion, because it was easy- and any yokel could squeeze working code out of their ass- whether or not it was good. (That's how I started) But now most of the 'beginner' projects are done in ASP or PHP- because they are free, and can be created 'on the sly' without having to request $800-$1,500 of server software.
Now I spend about 25% of my time converting someone's crap-ass (poorly done) PHP projects over to Cold Fusion once the people in charge find out that it's insecure, crash-prone and impossible to build on to. Strangely, the time has come that the Cold Fusion programmers are the ones with more experience (because it is not the language du jour, newbies are no longer jumping on the bandwagon) and the projects are put together in a more mature manner.
Just as before, when Cold Fusion's biggest problem was that any jackass could use it- now I see the same thing happening to PHP. Jackasses covertly set it up on their small department webserver...and then I get paid to clean up their mess.
Oh well- it's a job!
No reason to lie.
Whoops...I assume you are talking about the site on my sig. (or maybe it was a general comment...)
Yes- the site linked on my sig is a pretty basic piece of crap...but I like it that way. In no way does it reflect my super-uber hard-core coding skills that I use during my wonderful life at work. Or possibly it does...but from looking at my linked site, at least you know I'm not a very good designer.
No reason to lie.
Best logic ever.
Use an older and less popular language because the developer you hire is less likely to be faking their skill.
I don't know much of anything about Cold Fusion, when I started it was already on the decline and the price tag kept me from suggesting it to employers... but all I know is that the argument seems seriously flawed to me. Good PHP, good ASP, good JSP all are secure and scale just fine... and they're definitely easy to build on.
Yes, a poorly coded project is a poor product, there's no question about that. But, and call me greedy, I want the best implementation written in the best technology for my problem, not the best implementation written in the language where I'm likely to find the best developer.
My point was that CF is a good technology. The previous perception was that it was 'teh ghey' (as the above poster told us). This was due mainly to the number of crappy coders who were using it- not a reflection of the language/platform (whatever you want to call it) itself.
It has been a good product for a long time- but the good parts were overshadowed by some of the crappy code people were putting together. Now it has less crappy code, and this is actually a good thing.
No reason to lie.