Slashdot Mirror


Copyright Office Suggests Changes To Induce Act

An anonymous reader writes "The US Copyright Office has proposed a new version of the Induce act. Under this new version it is apparently more difficult to bring charges against a company for inducement. Stories on the subject can be found at DRMBlog.com and at News.com."

5 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. I should probably RTFA, but... by spike2131 · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    What's "inducement"?

    --
    SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
  2. Canada, here I come. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait


    Canada isn't a police state.

  3. Re:Anyone sensible even attending? by stratjakt · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Apple huh?

    Well as a loyal slashdotter, I absolutely love the INDUCE act now that I know Steve Jobs invented it.

    As soon as it comes in lavendar I will order 3 and astroturf here endlessly about how awesome and innovative they are!

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  4. Re:Artists are NOT suffering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    As a member of the American Federation of Musicians (I am a freelance musician in Chicago) who has performed and recorded in royalty-pay situations, I can tell you that the artists are the FIRST to get the shaft.

    Please do not EVER confuse the RIAA and MPAA with actual ARTISTS.

    Seems to me that you have confused yourself with "artist". Hack hired-gun note-monkeys are not artists.

    ;)
  5. Re:I am thinking about moving to Canada, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    What a friggin moron. Canada is a morass of spineless, culture-less, socialist, lazy-ass idiots suffering from identity crisis. Are they even a country?