Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Patents Keyboard Browser Navigation

Scooby Snacks writes "It looks like Microsoft and the United States Patent and Trademark Office have done it again. It would appear that Microsoft, in their extensive R&D labs, have developed a way to control a web browser through the use of a keyboard. What's next, a method for displaying a plurality of running programs, each in its own defined rectangular viewing area?"

32 comments

  1. This is a duplicate article :-( by sycotic · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    -- If I were a fish, I'd be wet
  2. Redundant news by ubrkl · · Score: 3, Informative

    What's the point of posting this as news...? There's so much prior art (Lynx) that this patent will be thrown away as soon as someone challenges it.

    The story should be called: USPTO stuffs up again.

    NTSH, MA

    1. Re:Redundant news by NanoGator · · Score: 0

      "The story should be called: USPTO stuffs up again."

      Slashdot's trying so hard to be an anti-MS watchdog. Wolf! Wolf!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Redundant news by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that this patent will be thrown away as soon as someone challenges it.

      If only someone REALLY rich would join our side.

  3. An outdated dupe... by Reorax · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not only was this story posted a few days ago, but the patent was filed seven years ago. I may hate Microsoft as much as the next guy, but seven years? C'mon people....

    --
    This sig is only here so people stop skipping the last lines of my posts.
    1. Re:An outdated dupe... by neitzsche · · Score: 1

      It was only granted as a patent on 8/31. (But yes, this is a duplicate /. article.)

      Mircosoft obfuscating facts to obtain patents (and obviously bribing the USPTO) is always news. The web was originally TEXT ONLY. How many roll & scroll applications used a mouse at all in 1997? For the USPTO to say that using a keyboard is an INVENTION is an outrage! Remember when LYNX was the only way to view the 'net?

      C'mon yourself. This is blasphemous.

      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
    2. Re:An outdated dupe... by jerde · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The web was originally TEXT ONLY. How many roll & scroll applications used a mouse at all in 1997?

      I share your righteous indignation at the stupid patent, but your facts are a bit off...

      Read Tim Berners-Lee's FAQ about the web. The first web browser was designed on a NeXT system, and was graphical. Yes, a line-mode browser was written shortly thereafter, but a windowed point-and-click version came first. Graphics weren't inline, but they were definitely part of the initial idea. But the app itself was indeed GUI based.

      And how many applications used a mouse in 1997!? Dude, all the apps I've been using have been with a mouse since Jan 24, 1984, where've you been? :)

      But seriously, the patent is patently ridiculous, excuse the pun. The "invention" is a method for using the tab key to select a link on a web page. I feel as though millions of geeks all cried out "DUH!" and were silenced...

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
  4. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Slashdot pattents duping!!

    1. Re:In other news... by unixbum · · Score: 1
      "Slashdot pattents duping!!"
      In other news, slashdotter patents bad spelling.
  5. Have the /. editorial staff been outsourced? by scupper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am going to be karma flogged for this, but it seems in the last 6 months that the editorial staff of slashdot may have been quietly outsourced. Aren't the number of dupes reaching an unprecidented high in slashdot history?

  6. really... by JVert · · Score: 2, Funny

    So... they are scared of lynx now?

  7. Re:Have the /. editorial staff been outsourced? by Jahf · · Score: 0

    No, not really.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  8. ctrl+alt+del by DeadBugs · · Score: 1

    They should patent Control Alt Delete for every time IE crashes.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  9. Re:Have the /. editorial staff been outsourced? by Jahf · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, not really.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  10. Is there a group of Dupe Trolls? by Hex4def6 · · Score: 1

    I can understand how articles now and again get duped -- but how does a seven year old patent get mentioned within a week twice? I find it highly coincidental two people were browsing for seven year old MS patents and happened to stumble upon the same patent.

    *TIN FOIL HAT*

    Its a consipracy I tell ya!

    1. Re:Is there a group of Dupe Trolls? by DaoudaW · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good grief guys! RTFP

      The patent was applied for March 6, 1997, but it wasn't approved/published until August 30, 2004. Sorry, no coincidences involved, it's just a week old story which is about on par for Slashdot.

      Whoops, I pressed tab to preview my comment. Dang I hate to pay those M$ royalties!

    2. Re:Is there a group of Dupe Trolls? by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

      How in the world did it take seven years to get this put through?

      You'd think that if they were actually looking for prior art they would have found it in that time. I think we've just learned that the mysterious black box through which patents are passed doesn't have any wild mechanisms other than a long queue.

      --Matthew

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
  11. ze whore of ze karma on ze dupped storee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Abstract

    A user may discover and navigate among hyperlinks through the use of a keyboard. For example, a user may press a tab key to discover and navigate to a first hyperlink that is part of a hypertext document. The first hyperlink is, in response, given focus and a focus shape is drawn around the text or graphics for the hot region of the hyperlink. If the user again presses the tab key, the next hyperlink is given focus and a focus shape (i.e., an outline that surrounds the next hyperlink) is drawn around the next hyperlink. A user may also tab to a placeholder for an image in order to make a decision whether the image should be downloaded or not.
    Inventors: Cote; Joseph Paul-Emile Pierre (Issaquah, WA); Cordell; John P. (Seattle, WA); Brown; Christopher R. (Seattle, WA)
    Assignee: Microsoft Corporation (Redmond, WA)
    Appl. No.: 812772
    Filed: March 6, 1997

  12. MS Royalties, Shakespeare style... by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 1

    Dang I hate to pay those M$ royalties!

    No kidding! They don't even anesthetize you for the operation!

    What are they doing with all that back skin, anyway?

    ~UP

    --
    Eat the Path.
  13. Please by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 1
    "What's next, a method for displaying a plurality of running programs, each in its own defined rectangular viewing area?"


    Don't give them ideas!
  14. curved focus shapes by uits · · Score: 1

    This was pointed out before, but see, this is for CURVED focus shapes, polygons, and the like. Yeah, I think it's brilliant too...

  15. Rectangular? by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Windows XP, the top two corners are ROUNDED.... oh shit! There goes my patent idea.

  16. Re:Have the /. editorial staff been outsourced? by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Interesting
    No, not really.

    ("This exact comment has already been posted. Try to be more original..." - Wow, that's a new one.)

  17. Prior Art! by stinkydog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As the 1980s came to a close, a high tech web browsing tool called LYNX stormed the scene. It was the the browser of choice on my text only VAX account at Wright State University. The arrow keys moved up and down through the links and the spacebar represented the 'click'. I hope microsoft sue on this one, so that they can be laughed out of court. You can still download and use Lynx at http://lynx.isc.org/.

    SD

    --
    âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
    1. Re:Prior Art! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can still download and use"?

      Hey, it's my primary browser.

  18. Re:Have the /. editorial staff been outsourced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've gotten that so many times using "...You insensitive clod!" and "First post!" and some GNAA stuff.

  19. Re:Have the /. editorial staff been outsourced? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    Now all they have to do is moan about stuff copied from the "comment rejected" page.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  20. At what point .... by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will a behaviour which has been available in various applications for two decades be exempt from patenting?

    The use of keys to control a GUI is far from novel, and just because it's the damned web I fail to see anything new or original about this.

    Waay back when Microsoft applications didn't run in windows or anything, and there was no network to connect to, that whole "alt+f" to bring up the file menu was well established in things like DOS' edit program and has been applied to everything since.

    Aeons before that, vt100 terminals and the like could use the tab key to move among fields for data input. Hell, the Motif style guidelines would have included stuff which describes how to do keyboard shortcuts, and it predated Microsoft's patent application by a whole lot of years.

    I've said this before, but why the hell is a method of interacting with a piece of software via the keyboard a novel or patentable exercise, or does it count as innovation???

    If you've had keyboard navigation in applications for over a decade (almost two!), just because you add keyboard navigation to a new application doesn't mean shit.

    Meh.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:At what point .... by abandonment · · Score: 1

      the question is when this kind of behavior (patenting blatantly obvious works) becomes criminal - otherwise microsoft will continue to apply (and likely receive) these idiotic patents.

      just like acacia's 'web streaming' patent that applies to any file downloaded off the internet.

      give me freakin break.

  21. Re:Have the /. editorial staff been outsourced? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

    No, not really

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  22. Toilet Fl ushing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Houston quick. Someone patent the way the water swirls as I flush my shit down the toilet.