Slashdot Mirror


Federal Judge Rules Oracle can Bid for PeopleSoft

terrymaster69 writes "The NY Times reports (free reg, required) that Oracle may have the go ahead to continue its hostile bidding for PeopleSoft. The Justice Department had previously tried to paint the merger as anti-competitive in the corporate services software market. 'Judge Vaughn R. Walker of the Federal District Court in San Francisco rejected the government's definition of the market as too narrow, noting that the software business is particularly dynamic, with a host of current and emerging competitors in that area including Microsoft.'"

5 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. Point by leonmergen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, I think they do have a point there... there is plenty of competition around in the database market, and Oracle would still have to compete in a 'real' way - as far as I can see they can't be able to abuse their market position, simply because there's enough competition.

    On the other hand, a big corporation getting even bigger isn't really a good thing...

    --
    - Leon Mergen
    http://www.solatis.com
    1. Re:Point by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      there is plenty of competition around in the database market

      This case not related to the database market. Oracle is trying to acquire PeopleSoft in order to improve their position in the applications market. This includes things like HR, Payroll, Accounting and Purchasing systems.

    2. Re:Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft have considered buying SAP have they? Don't make us all laugh now. SAP is as big, if not bigger, than Microsoft. Now, Microsoft and SAP were at one point talking about a merger but it was only ever at a very simple level, and nothing ever came to it. Besides which if Microsoft and SAP were to announce a merger the DoJ and EU Monopolies Comission would have a field day.

  2. Be interesting to see if they actually acquire now by base3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oracle's real interest was making sure that PeopleSoft didn't acquire J.D. Edwards--but Oracle failed in that endeavor. I don't think Oracle actually wants to buy PeopleSoft, but is now forced to "go through the motions," lest they be caught in their act of blatant tortious interference in trying to sabotage the Edwards deal. My guess is that Oracle will lowball the offer and now allow the issue to die. This doesn't even consider the poison pill provisions allowing PeopleSoft clients refunds if Oracle buys PeopleSoft.

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  3. Re:not out of the woods by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ERP systems are far less interchangeable than low quality hamburgers. Claiming that there are hundreds of Lilluputians in the market does nothing to counter the problem of market dominance by a few small players.

    The Judge's reasoning would only work if someone could point to a 4th player willing, ready and able to take up the slack when the #3 player sabotages the #1 player.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.