Federal Judge Rules Oracle can Bid for PeopleSoft

terrymaster69 writes "The NY Times reports (free reg, required) that Oracle may have the go ahead to continue its hostile bidding for PeopleSoft. The Justice Department had previously tried to paint the merger as anti-competitive in the corporate services software market. 'Judge Vaughn R. Walker of the Federal District Court in San Francisco rejected the government's definition of the market as too narrow, noting that the software business is particularly dynamic, with a host of current and emerging competitors in that area including Microsoft.'"

Comments

Re:Point

[lucabrasi999]

there is plenty of competition around in the database market

This case not related to the database market. Oracle is trying to acquire PeopleSoft in order to improve their position in the applications market. This includes things like HR, Payroll, Accounting and Purchasing systems.

Be interesting to see if they actually acquire now

[base3]

Oracle's real interest was making sure that PeopleSoft didn't acquire J.D. Edwards--but Oracle failed in that endeavor. I don't think Oracle actually wants to buy PeopleSoft, but is now forced to "go through the motions," lest they be caught in their act of blatant tortious interference in trying to sabotage the Edwards deal. My guess is that Oracle will lowball the offer and now allow the issue to die. This doesn't even consider the poison pill provisions allowing PeopleSoft clients refunds if Oracle buys PeopleSoft.

Re:not out of the woods

[jedidiah]

ERP systems are far less interchangeable than low quality hamburgers. Claiming that there are hundreds of Lilluputians in the market does nothing to counter the problem of market dominance by a few small players.

The Judge's reasoning would only work if someone could point to a 4th player willing, ready and able to take up the slack when the #3 player sabotages the #1 player.