Slashdot Mirror


TiVo, ReplayTV Agree to Limits

Grump writes "This story reports that 'The makers of TiVo and ReplayTV digital video recorders have agreed to limit how long consumers can keep pay-for-view movies stored on future versions of the VCR-like devices.' Is this fair, or erosion of more fair-use rights?"

11 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. The Divx Road by stecoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As I recall in the recent past, a well-known seller tried to limit viewing of movies by introducing the Divx technology whereby, the machine would connect to a server to get a key to view. Now if Replay or Tivo try this then there will be a backlash from the consumer. What would be ironic is if one of these PVR manufactures goes bully up than I suspect that the software community will pickup the fragments and produce code to do whatever the original community want.

    On a side note, I watch a video program on my PVR from PBS that was for educational instructional use and it had a disclaimer at the beginning stating that copies could be used up until 2006 or so. I don't have any intent on keeping the program that long but why should I depend on a 3 party source to keep and maintain material. A distributed system where PVR owners share programs is just about to become a rally by certain. This peeves me - the thing that manufactures/groups worry about the most is usually good for them and the consumer.

    To sum the two paragraphs together: the video material should be in an inter-dispersed local (PVRs) and not limited because of popularity (Fair use). In fact the material should only survive if it is popular enough to be wanted/distributed from enough people wanting to exchange the information - If no one wants it then it would disappear.

  2. Bastards.. by grub · · Score: 5, Interesting


    These two competitors have agreed on a completely arbitrary limit for recording PPV shows. Why? Think about it: the PVR market is growing. Rather than focusing on new features for the consumer (ie: "We offer 1.5 times the PPV time-limit over our competitor.") they've come to an agreement that is good for no one but themselves. There's no way in hell that they just decided to do this, the entire agreement has the fetid stink of collusion.

    Take control, this is yet another reason to dump TV entirely and download what you want to watch.

    Sorry, it's Friday, I'm in RantMode and I have First Damn Post.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Bastards.. by IronChef · · Score: 5, Insightful

      These two competitors have agreed on a completely arbitrary limit for recording PPV shows. Why?

      Replay took away the ability to automatically skip commercials in their newest units? Why? Because they got their ass sued off over that feature. So they caved and took it out.

      It doesn't matter if you are in the right if you can't afford to prove it.

      Don't blame TiVo and Replay, blame the broadcasters who are really the ones who want to control what you do.

    2. Re:Bastards.. by ePhil_One · · Score: 5, Informative
      No, Make that -5 Tinfoil Hat Club

      from the grandparent...
      These two competitors have agreed on a completely arbitrary limit for recording PPV shows. Why? Think about it: the PVR market is growing. Rather than focusing on new features for the consumer (ie:...) they've come to an agreement that is good for no one but themselves. There's no way in hell that they just decided to do this, the entire agreement has the fetid stink of collusion.

      Get a clue, this "feature" is good for no one but the movie industry. My Tivo already keeps PPV movies as long as a choose to, as does a ReplayTV. It sure as heck isn't good for Tivo/ReplayTV.

      They now have to differentiate and tag PPV content vs other content

      They have to deal with more support calls ("My show is gone, even though I set Save until I delete")

      They get put in a situation where old code/hardware is percieved as "better" than new code/hardware

      This isn't collusion, this is concession. And it sucks, because if I use a VCR to record my PPV movies, I face no such restrictions. Fortunately, I don't ever buy PPV movies, but this begins a long slide where soon all content will be forcibly expired off my Tivo because Seinfeld's owners don't want me to watch the "Soup Nazi" episode at will. Which is foolish because the trick of Tivo is that I watch MORE TV now that I can always find something I want to watch, and I'm more likely to fast forward through a show than the commercials, because these days I'm amazed at the amount of crap that fills the "program" time; title segments, recaps, slow pans to establish location, end credits, watching guests walk accross stage and waiting for applause to die down, etc, etc.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
  3. On other news by Guiri · · Score: 5, Informative
    MythTV 0.16 has been released today.

    Enjoy!

  4. TiVo Limits by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's crap!

    Not that the story is wrong, but the idea is bullshit.

    I have a TiVo and I upgraded it with a 140Gb drive, so I get over 100hrs of storage. I use it in exactly the way they should want someone to. I'm not a couch potato, I work for a living. There are shows I like to watch, but I usually don't have time to just sit down at watch when they're on. I usually start watching television around 2am. For years, this meant I watched crap. Now that I have a TiVo, I can watch good shows.

    We'll use their example of '6 feet under'. I may not get a chance to watch it til a week later. Should I miss the episode because they decided to set an arbitrary limit to how long I can keep it stored? What if I'm out of town for work for a week? Can't I come home, and catch up on the episodes that I missed. Yes, this has happened more than once, and it's *REALLY* nice that I can do it.

    I haven't seen any black market shops selling '6 feet under' episodes recorded with TiVo.

    How about PPV movies? My girlfriend has watched movies, and recorded them (on the TiVo). I may sit down a week or two later, and watch that movie. Fair use. The household paid for it. Or more like, *I* paid for it. If we had been home at the same time, we would have watched together. So if this goes through, now she'll see the movie or show, and I'll be out of luck?

    They're not afraid of piracy, they're looking at possible revenue that they're missing. They could possibly get an extra PPV viewing fee because I would possibly buy it twice. Well, that's wrong, I wouldn't. I won't pay twice, I just won't watch it til it comes out on HBO and I happen to be sitting there.

    As for '6 feet under', I actually was into that show in the first few seasons. I didn't have a TiVo, but my schedule permitted me to be at home to watch it. At the time, I didn't own a TiVo. My work schedule changed, and I missed several episodes, and was lost about the story line when I tried to start watching again. If I had a TiVo then, I could have spent some time catching up on old episodes, and still been interested in the series. Now that's a show I simply don't watch. It's a waste of their broadcasting time, because I don't know what's happened previously.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  5. Divx deja vue. by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I haven't seen a single advantage to PPV. The movies that I see available on DirecTV have already been out in the movie store for over a month (ie Starsky and Hutch). I pay less at the video store and I get to keep the movie for 5 days...

    So what advantage does a $4.00 movie via PPV (plus additional fees that they might charge) have?

    Let me know when I can purchase DVDs over my Tivo and have a tangible piece of media to store it for life that doesn't take up my TV recording space and I'll be interested. Until then it's just another Divx knockoff that's going to die because no one cares.

  6. Tivo Hack #1 (for Tivo Hacks 2nd edition) by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    "How to permanently keep your recorded data"

  7. Right. by sulli · · Score: 5, Insightful
    And do you really think Joe User will contend with:

    mythtv-suite

    ATrpms - by Distribution > common > mythtv-suite
    Meta-package dragging in all of MythTV and add-ons.

    This package is only useful in conjunction with apt-get, yum, or any other automatic dependency resolver.

    It merely contains dependencies to all other required myth components, which in turn drag in further dependencies.

    If you have an atrpms enabled apt-get or yum, all you have to do is
    apt-get update && apt-get install mythtv-suite

    or
    yum install mythtv-suite

    Have a look at the multimedia rpms to browse through the actual packages. Instructions for installing/configuring apt-get and/or yum are at the front page.

    NOTE: drivers are not installed with mythtv-suite. If any rpms for a driver exists, you can still use apt-get or yum to install them.

    NOTE: While rpms make installing mythtv and dependencies very easy, configuring mythtv/xmltv etc. is still needed. Please read carefully the documentation at the official mythtv web site. There are also walkthrough guides like Jarod C. Wilson's guide and Tyler Butler's installation guide also for the PVR-250.

    And this is on the precompiled binaries page! How the heck will any non-Linux-geek figure this out?

    Someone really needs to compile a MythTV LiveCD (or whatever) that you can just install and run on a PC with suitable video hardware. Having to figure out all this Linux mumbo-jumbo, or worse, compile it yourself, is a recipe for saying "screw it" and going back to TiVo, restrictions or no.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Right. by Mr+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean like Knoppmyth?

  8. Do people use TIVO to *store* videos? by SamNmaX · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've been using a MythTV setup for quite a while now, and I've been using it as anyone would expect me to, to record my shows so I can watch them at a later time. While certainly it is possible for me to store the videos for later viewing, I don't, simply because there is rarely much point in doing so, even with movies.

    I think perhaps television companies are failing to see the true positives and negatives of these systems. Their true problem is not that people will turn their TIVO into a movie library (hence filling it to the point where they won't have any more space), but that they will skip commercials. The most likely response to this, besides desperate legislation, is to build more and more advertising into the shows themselves. Whether this is a good or bad scenerio, I don't know. It means less time wasted with commercials, but content becoming much more controlled.

    The positives of these systems is there is no longer a 'prime time'. Once these systems are wide spread, you can schedule shows at any time, including the middle of the night, and people who want to watch them can.

    As for Tivo and Replays "solution" here, well, not being able to keep pay-per-view stuff forever isn't so bad, though I'll stick with my MythTV box which I have total control over. The bad part of this is that this isn't likely to be the only restriction but the start of many restrictions which will further erode the usefulness of these systems, and even worse, the coming of new laws that would likely have made systems like Tivo illegal in the first place if they came a little earlier.