Slashdot Mirror


Debian Hardened Aims For Security

larryg writes "Debian Hardened is a new project that wants be an official Debian sub-project. It aims to provide a complete tree of hardened kernel and software packages for a standard Debian distribution, without changing to another like Adamantix and making easy the hardening of any machine running Debian GNU/Linux. The hardened kernels use the grSecurity patch and some of the Adamantix kernel patches; also, its packages are compiled with the ProPolice/SSP gcc extension and some libraries to prevent and trace buffer overflow attacks. Also, and as a second project, we are working on some enhacements against the Linux Entropy Pool engine, using an external TRNG (True Random Numbers Generator) device which uses thermal noise and also the atomic decay from a Geiger counter, making true unpredictable random numbers."

11 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cant wait to use it with my Lexar JumpDrive loaded with security sofware against hackers.

  2. Hardened Gentoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Doesn't provide as many choices or the technological /security understanding of Hardened Gentoo
    (not to mention the very similar name)
    http://hardened.gentoo.org

  3. Debian could use that as a spam headline! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hard3n y0ur Debian/w0ody t0day!

  4. It's good for both, actually; by Progman3K · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Debian's team can implement it a certain way and whatever amazing thing they cook-up can be re-used by the Gentoo team!

    The goal is not a religious war, the goal is for you and I to get ahead.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  5. Enhacements against the Linux Entropy Pool engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has anyone ever,ever,ever compromised a computer or encrypted document by predicting the output of a random number generator?

    Would the time not be better spent looking for the next OpenSSH/SSL hole?

    I'm not trolling, most security flaws come from everyday apps rather than esoteric problems.

  6. New pickup line for geeks... by vettemph · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wanna mount my hardened woody?

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    1. Re:New pickup line for geeks... by vettemph · · Score: 5, Funny

      ....Hardened Woody set for release!

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  7. They'd need more drastic changes by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a Hardened Gentoo user; although, I only use a subset of all the hardened herd's efforts :) I actually do understand what I'm doing, though, and am trying to spread that understanding myself. I am in no way affiliated with [Hardened] Gentoo or Debian.

    At any rate, these people don't understand that they'll need more drastic changes. Why not bring attention to http://d-sbd.alioth.debian.org/ while you're at it? This is my project, just a demonstrational effort to bring these things to the attention of the Debian maintainers.

    The idea isn't to have a hardened "Enhancement," but rather to incorporate anything you can put in that won't hurt. For example, you can compile glibc, gnome, and bash with SSP/ProPolice, and nothing else will use ProPolice but those. Those programs also won't be hurt by ProPolice. We can extend this to, "Compile any program or library that won't break with it with SSP." The user will never notice; but it'll stop a range of attacks.

    My point is that you need to aim low. A hardened system like Hardened Gentoo or Adamantix will supply you with *everything* -- PaX, SSP, ET_DYN binaries, rediculously complicated MAC systems, firewalling maybe, network sniffers, etc. A non-hardened distribution should look at each of these, determine which don't change the end user's experience (administrator included), and implement them. This is "Do what's easy" rather than "Do EVERYTHING we possibly can," but it's still better than just being lame in the area of security.

  8. Who are these people? by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 5, Informative

    First off, who are these guys?

    Debian already has a security project, a few of them actually.

    I looked at google for either of these guys names and unless I am mistaken, this is what I got: developer one and developer two.

    Interesting that anyone else that they haven't ever used those names to contribute to say at least a single debian security mailing list, or say ANY debian lists?

    Even more interesting is that they don't seem to have much but a slashdot plug and they are accepting donations.

    I am not impressed. Working with the debian security team is the way to go.

    Steve Kemp is one of the main guys heading up the debian audit project, these guys should be working with him. Not for some other project.

    The official debian project for this is the debian audit project.

    Hell advertising that they use SSP enabled GCC! Steve makes those packages for use with debian already!

    --


    "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
  9. Re:Interesting....... by OmegaBlac · · Score: 5, Informative
    I still think the less you have the more secure it is.... as long as what you have isnt bloated.
    I agree.
    So if this thing is more than one iso image ill be rather skeptical since debian tends to be a very large distro...
    You only need to download 1 Debian ISO to install it. There even is a minimal iso version for network installs. The default Debian install is the bare miniumum. Hardly if any services are running on a default Deb install. Yes Debian has the largest selection of packages, but no one is forcing anyone to download all the ISOs just to install Deb. Just install and apt-get away what you need!
  10. as *if*! by Llewyn · · Score: 5, Funny
    i suppose 'Debian Hardened' is not referring to the installation process... yegods! it was hard enough already!


    but seriously... as a debian user, i fully condone harder, faster, and stronger debians.