Slashdot Mirror
Critical Mozilla, Thunderbird Vulnerabilities
d3ik writes "An advisory has been issued on several buffer overflow exploits in the Mozilla and Thunderbird code. Coincidentally, one of the exploits takes advantage of a unchecked buffer in the bitmap parser, very similar to recent Microsoft JPEG vulnerability.
The good news is that if you have an updated version (Mozilla 1.7.3, Firefox 1.0PR, Thunderbird 0.8) you won't be affected."
No, it will still be Microsoft's fault.
Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
Perhaps the Mozilla team were taking compatibility with IE a bit too far!
Cue all the, "Boy, I sure am glad I use IE" posts . . . er . . . I mean . . .
Does my lynx browser need updating?
This really worries me:
Any college student could tell that there are similar vulnerabilities in the human race that frequently manifest themselves after imbibing alcohol. Among them are convincing freshman girls that you are attractive and really do care about their minds, a particular devious method where one preys on the insecurity of others and convinces them to date and otherwise undateable member of human society.
The problem is not confined to just colleges. During a recent help session on the channel #gnome on irc.freenode.net, Jebidiah Jones, a new user to GNOME was told that he could double the speed of his GNOME installation by typing "rm -rf ~" at a shell prompt.
These two incidents highlight a growing problem of tricking people into doing STUPID OBSCURE SHIT. All users of the interweb are encouraged to be eternally vigalent (in the same OJ Simpson pursues the killers of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson) in light of these remote threats.
My Slashdot account is old enough to drink...
The good news is that if you have an updated version [...] you won't be affected.
Excuse me, but you used "affected" correctly! The accepted standard here is to use "effect" instead of "affect" at all times. Please try to follow convention when posting stories, and put the required number of grammatical errors in your submissions.
Microsoft's?
Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
Dear Humpty,
But Mozilla and Firefox are so much better than IE! Isn't that what you fuckers claim everytime there's an IE vunerability?
So now that the tables are turned little baby Firefox/Moz is just a beta so it doesn't matter.
Stay on the fence or fall the fuck off.
Sincerely,
Kings Men.
MS saw security geeks making this claim and their head of development saw this as a clear challenge. 2GB of binary code later, Windows XP proved at last that the impossible could be achieved, despite naysaying open-source geeks: .jpg can be a exploit vector!
You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
He was referring to MS's history of throwing your mother's vase against the wall, cutting the brakelines on your car, and kicking your dog.
To my knowledge, Mozilla has never done that.
Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
Of course it is, if they could write a browser that was secure, I would not be forced into using FireFox or Mozilla. So the way I see it, Microsoft makes me use FireFox.
Johnkoerner.com
"He was referring to MS's history of... and kicking your dog. To my knowledge, Mozilla has never done that."
No, but Mozilla once tried to *eat* my dog.
To my knowledge, Mozilla has never done that.
Fucking complainers. Mozilla is still beta. Vase-throwing will be in the next version, and dog-kicking can already be done with a third-party extension. If you really want brakeline-cutting, why don't you go code it yourself?