Apache httpd 2.0.51 Released
djh101010 writes "apache.org has announced version 2.0.51 of their webserver, which is a bug-fix (rather than a feature) release. There are 5 security vulnerabilities addressed by this release, so if you're using mod_ssl, IPv6, or a couple other things, it's worth taking a look at what was fixed."
Does anyone have any information about whether the mod_ssl DoS vuln effects Apache 1.3.x as well? Thanks. -molo
Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
Can't speak to 2.0; I'm still using 1.99_16 myself, which seems to be playing nice with 2.0.50 and I assume 2.0.51 (building now).
I've yet to try it out, but this release claims to allow the administrator to unset the previously-mandatory Content-Location header added when mod_negotiation is in play.
This "feature" triggered an Opera "feature" that made in-document fragment anchors fail on dynamically generated, URL-rewritten documents.
Full description of the problem. Hopefully 2.0.51 means I don't need to fiddle with the Apache source any more: I'll update the problem page if so.
Ydco co
Yeah, it's fixed. You can now remove the Content-Location header, which works around the Opera "feature".
Explanation page updated.
Ydco co
http://www.cgisecurity.com/webservers/apache/
Here at Texas A&M, IBM just gave a talk to our ULUG (Unix & Linux UG) about a project they use called "BogoSec" where they can get rough estimations of source security.
The most drastic example of security problems was between vsftpd and wu-ftpd, but the presenter also showed some graphs for httpd 2.xxx releases, where the bugfix releases drastically improved the security.
Hoorah for bugfix releases, they're always good.
Error 407 - No creative sig found
ABI is generally stable enough. Be careful about just replacing httpd / libhttpd.so though - because some of the security / bug fixes are in modules (or in libapr.so / libaprutil.so) and not the core.
Third party modules should march happily on without being rebuilt.
An obvious exception might be modperl which provides substantial coverage of entry points, constant #defines and other aspects of the core itself. It also relies on 'expected results' from alot of edge functions which weren't widely used (and therefore subject to bug fixes - e.g. behavior changes.) While not 100% necessary, it is certainly a good idea to rebuild modperl with each point bump.