Analyst Doubts Intel's Dual-Core Demo
bakeacake writes "At Xbitlabs they have a article on the possibility that Intel's Dual core Preview at the IDF was not real. Would Intel sink this low?
"An analyst expressed doubts about demonstration of a 'real' dual-core microprocessor during an Intel's recent demonstration at Intel Developer Forum Fall 2004 in San Francisco, California. Insight's Nathan Brookwood believes that Intel was most likely to showcase a dual-processor system instead of a dual-core processor-based system during the show.""
Anybody have doubts about that?
Yawn, YAADS. This discussion is now been reserved for trolls to play.
----
Free Firefoxes for every reader!
well fuck
" the system used "an engineering prototype" of a dual core processor with "real silicon." " At least thats real...glad they continue to shower us with these technical nuggets. Seriously, is it just possible that Bill Siu is technically incompetent? I generally try to avoid knowledge of corporate pawns, so its up for grabs, but I certainly wouldnt be shocked. Its annoying to hear incorrect info, tho...cant trust anyone now. At this rate, soon even Microsoft will be lying to us...
Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
Intel lost touch with the reality long time ago. Proof? RDRAM, Itanic, 64-bit, GHz as main measure processor performance, ... "Rigged" demo is just the next step.
Is dual core like dual penetration?
why? cuz I mastubrate to that sheeeit ni99a
The demonstration was given by CBS "news" anchor Dan Rather. How dare you question the veracity of the demonstration? He even provided a witness who "feels the demonstration was accurate." This doubting of the dual-core demo is just the paranoid raving of a bunch of pajama-clad right-wing nut jobs.