The Living Room Candidate
Karin Ponce writes "I represent the American Museum of the Moving Image , and I wanted to write to you about the Museum's latest online exhibition, The Living Room Candidate. The exhibition maintains a comprehensive and detailed collection of over 300 commercials from the past fourteen elections (1954-2000). As the presidential race heats up, I think this is a very timely exhibition that will equip your readers with insight on the development of the campaign messages crafted by our presidential candidates over the years and provide historical context for the 2004 campaign as the race unfolds. Its convenience (all commercials are available online in the Living Room Candidate website) make this exhibit a must-see for voters and non-voters."
Oh, they're historic campaign commercials ... oh, OK, nevermind ... no Slashdot Effect to worry about!
Wow, I just went to the site and was perusing the 2004 election commercials. For once they gave a realistic view of our future.
Blank.
Remember to give serious thought to who you are voting for in November and make sure that those around you are at least somewhat educated on what they are voting for.
Sounds like as good a reason as any to limit the amount people can spend on a Presidential campaign.
yes, there are freedom of speech issues but most countries already deign to regulate political campaigning, especially around election time. it's not that much of a stretch to set a hard limit, and only allow it to increase with inflation. plus less of those stupid ads on tv.
in effect it prevents those voters who have more money donating more $$$ to their favoured candidate, and in essence getting "more than their one vote".
-- james
"I represent the American Museum of the Moving Image, and I wanted to write to you to ask you for your help in melting our Web server, bringing our entire site to a halt. I think this is something your audience would find particular interest in doing."
I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.
I have an idea. Rather than watching campaign commercials, read each candidates Wikipedia page.
John Kerry
George Bush
That way you get unbiased info untainted by either party, with all the nitty gritty details. Try it with friends, see if they switch allegiances after seeing the truth.
By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
I was just discussing policitians with my father a few minutes ago while we were lunching. In two weeks brazilians are going to vote to elect municipal mayors and during all the day there are candidates on the TV saying that he/she will do the best for the city and stuff like that. It is always the same bullshit.
These bla bla bla will never win an election, so in my opinion most of the campaign money is throw away with this kind of trash campaign. I don't know how about US, but here in Brazil the candidates usually spend millions and millions in order to get elected while there are hundreds of thousands starving, in such a poverty situation that most of us would not belive.
20 some comments & slashdotted!
Here's the google cache:
http://216.239.53.104/search?q=cache:http://livinCheck my journal for gmail invites!
For those of you unfamiliar with the Bush version 1.0/ Dukakis matchup in 1988, the Republicans made very good negative attack ad use of the case of Willie Horton, a first degree murderer on a weekend furlough program in Massachusetts endorsed by Dukakis. Horton, surprise and shock and awe, became a recidivist violent criminal on his furlough.
;-(
Since he's trailing Bush version 2.0 right now, what Kerry needs is a good Willie Horton type attack ad.
Bin Laden anyone?
The Democrats need the balls to launch a full force negative press assault on Bush. The popularity of Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 prove that the public is receptive to serious Bush-bashing. Not wishy washy peripheral attacks and sniffing around the perimeter that Kerry seems married to right now, but a dead on hurricane force teeth gnashing polemic. Especially dismaying in Moore's movie is the revelation that Bush let the Bin Laden family fly out of the country in the days after 9/11/2001, when noone else was allowed to fly anywhere. Clearly a case of allegiance to big oil being more important than allegiance to the American public if there ever was one.
This revelation played well in theatres in Middle America, even in communities near military bases. Hello Kerry campaign: anyone listening? The Democrats need to grow a backbone and start pounding away at Bush where he is weakest.
So let us hope the Democrats find the cojones to attack Bush full force and head on in an attack ad blitz in October, Willie Horton style, or unfortunately for Americans (and the rest of the world for that matter), it's four more years of the drunken frat boy in big oil's pocket in the White House for us all.
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
must-see for voters and non-voters
What about for the rest of us!?
Yes, the American people really haven't gotten enough Bush bashing. I mean, c'mon, we haven't even seen Al Franken's Bush Is The Love Child Of Hitler and Tokyo Rose or Jim Hightower's Bush Kidnapped The Linbergh Baby or MoveOn.org's Bush Enjoys Raping Kittens, Small Children ad yet.
Here's what's interesting - note how the successful political campaigns usually say something about their candidate rather than just smear the other guy. Like what has John Kerry been doing for the last 20 years. Where are his major legislative accomplishments. He's had two decades in the Senate, let's see what he's done? As long as we're on it, let's see what his position is on Iraq. What would he do now to end the violence there? How would he fight terrorism? What would he do in Darfur? How will he stop the Iranians from developing nuclear weapons? How will he contain North Korea?
Hell, the Democrats should be doing that sort of thing regardless. I know it's a shock to some, but not everyone in America hates Bush. Some of us (gasp!) actually think he's done rather well given the situation he's had to work with. And some of us do so because we've actually taken the time to do our homework.
Nope, instead just bash Bush. There's a real winning strategy.
Hint, when the server recovers from being Slashdotted, take a look at McGovern's "Morning in America" ads and compare them to the ads Kerry is running. Note McGovern's electoral successes. Look at Mondale's ads against Reagan. Note how well he did.
Then note why campaigns that are just referendums against a relatively popular incumbant but offer no information on the challenger end up failing miserably.
so far as I can tell, not true of Clinton
Dole race (just a casual googling tells me
this). Where do you get your data from?
In every presidential election covered by television, the candidate with the most campaign money has become President.
Care to back up that assertion? I must have missed Bob Dole's narrow victory in 1996, then...
Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
Or its news channels. . . .
Need help treating your acne? Come here!