Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers
ChaoticCoyote writes "I've posted a comparison of recent GCC versions (3.3, 3.4, and the coming 4.0) with Intel C++ 8.1, including several benchmarks and "state-of-the-product" reviews. The new article replaces an older piece I published in late 2002. This
new comparison marks what I hope will be an ongoing series that tracks the quality of Linux compilers."
Oops, wrong site. Sorry.
CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.
So what, 4.0 will be even slower? Great news. NOT!
The title of the piece is "Linux C and C++ Compilers", yet the only ones benchmarked are GCC (various versions) and Intel's 8.1 ICC. Aren't there any others out there???
You know, it seems there were far more compilers available for DOS and OS/2 than are available for Linux. To me, this says that Open Source removes software choices from the consumer in the long run, which means that open source is not a good thing for the general software-consuming public. The ones that benefit from open source are those who don't want to pay for software...
Future generations will look back on open source, curse us and wonder how we could have been so naive and self-centered as to actually promote it...
troll much? http://icecream.sourceforge.net/ that the icecream your talking about? looks like a shoutcast client
Just like the chances of your ever having had sex (with a woman), you little basement-dwelling troll.
Any high level language compiler that is still case sensative should have it's collective dev team drag out the street and shot.
Having to hunt down the difference between X and x in 10,000+ lines of badly documented code is getting freakin old.
RAGE!
Nope, but someone does care about Gnome!