Slashdot Mirror


Fedora Core 3 Test 2 Available

p0 writes "Fedora Core 3 Test 2 is now available for downloading. The official .torrent tracker is here. It is also interesting that the Fedora Steering Committee has transferred Fedora Core 1 into the Fedora Legacy Project. If you would like to know the proposed development and release schedule for Fedora Core 3, you will find it here."

3 of 30 comments (clear)

  1. Obsolescence by alatesystems · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't believe how fast the FC1 has gone into legacy. I know this isn't RH supported, but I think I'm going to have to switch to an RHEL rebuild like WhiteBox.

    For the interested, we use WhiteBox at work on one of our AMD 64 bit servers and it works like a champ. They added yum, but other than that it's binary compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

    Chris

    1. Re:Obsolescence by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I use CentOS. It's nearly identical to WhiteBox, but with seemingly better community support, rather than having the appearance of being a one man project.

  2. is it faster or slower than 2? by josepha48 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I upgraded from fedora core 1 to fedora core 2 and gnome desktop got much much slower. So did kde. I also noticed that they switched to xorg. xorg in fedora core 2 is slow. No really really slow, and used up about 72 megs of ram. Run that with Gnome and a gnome panel or two and mozilla firebird, and I saw about 80% or my memory being sucked out the window, and I have 512 megs of ram / 1.2Ghz AMD CPU. I'll probably try fedora core 3 when it comes out, but if it is like this, I may switch to using gentoo on my desktop. Fedora does not make it easy to use the openbox window manager ( read gdm does not allow it as a selection ). They do not make it easy to use any of the other window managers that they include, except windowmaker. Why include this stuff it you are going to make it more difficult for someone to switch to it. It only confuses the end user.

    I thought I had a fast PC then I installed fedora core 2 and it seems as slow as my old P233 with 64megs of ram did.

    I'm not trying to be a troll, or flamebait, I'm just kinda supprised that the performance is as bad as it is, on my system. I'd really like to know if anyone else is experiencing performance degradation with thier fc2 system and what they did to overcome it?

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?