Slashdot Mirror
Can Anyone Suggest a Good Switch?
wgadmin asks: "I am a sysadmin for a 500-node Linux cluster. We are doubling the size of our compute nodes, so, as a consequence, we need a new switch. We currently have a Foundry FastIron 1500 -- however, a) it doesn't have enough ports (only 208) and b) it is extremely unreliable. We want something that's solid as a rock. We process mostly serial jobs. And we will probably require ~320 ports. What's everyone using for their HPC clusters? There's so many high performance switches on the market, we hardly know where to start."
What level of interconnect do you want? (gig copper? gig fiber? 10/100?)
Or are you looking for something more specialized (HIPPI compliant or something similarly obscure?)
That said, if you're looking for in the ethernet space, we've been really happy with our recent Extreme Networks chassie's. Their black diamond 10k line is the newest release, and it looks awesome. It's really dense, they've got crazy levels of backplane bandwidth, and ours have been really reliable (granted, we have the previous generation of the gear). The chassies have blades (just like everyone else) that can speak 10/100, 10/100/1000 copper, gig fiber, 10 gig fiber, etc.
Zapman
We've been using 3com switches and theyre rock solid. I was rooting for cisco a while ago because I'm studying for some certs, but the price difference is huge.
3Com comes with stackable switches, upto 8 of 48 ports which should be enough. The stacking bus is something like 10gbit or 32gbit for all-gigabit switches.
The switch market is really (1) Cisco (2) 3Com and (3) HP for market share, and I recommend you go with these. Cisco is more than 100% expensive than anyone else for the same stuff, and I've never been impressed with HP, so look at 3Com. Take a look at all those confusing nortel switches too, the number 4 of the market. You'll most likely find your switch between 3com and cisco, unless you want to give up reliability.
"Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
Extreme Networks has a great line of switches.
The Black Diamond 10808 would work great for the type of envrionment you have setup from the sounds of it. Also, Extreme is usually 20-40% cheaper then Cisco and Foundry for the equivilant appliance.
We currently use an Alpine 3808 with 192 100mbps ports and it's never had a problem with uptime and configuration is a simple and straightforward.
Check out Mon and Mon.cgi
http://www.force10networks.com/ claim to have the higest port density.
Cisco is the de-facto brand of networking gear for standard stuff like Ethernet. How much better are these high-performance switches people are talking about as suggestions in the comments here? This is not a rhetorical question, I just realy want to know and I'm too lazy and uninterested to look into it myself, but not lazy enough to stop typing this slashdot post. Is it enough to be worth going with non-Cisco for HPC clusters that use Ethernet-based interconnects? I know Cisco isn't infallible, but for all kinds of reasons they're a good bet in networking gear come purchasing time, at least outside this HPC cluster business.
11*43+456^2
Give serious thought to FC-IP and director-class fibrechannel kit. Performance-wise it'll thrash Ethernet, and there're various clever tricks you can do with directors clustered together via Open Trunking meaning that a bunch of 160 port boxes (a McData 6140 is your best bet here) will do as well as a larger single box.
I'm a sysadmin for a 3 large clusters in the same league, we use stackable 48 port Nortel switches. Each switch is 1u, and the interconnects don't use a separate port. The switches have wildly expensive support options, however because it just works we've never had to pay for support on them.
We use to have Foundry ourselves, but their switches were crap, they would suddenly become dumb hubs and lose their ip, etc.
We tried HP, but found their interface cumbersome and unfamiliar with weird networking related issues that would pop up.
Cisco's been rock solid, but very expensive.
Can I get an eye poke?
Dog House Forum
Send email to a few supercomputing centers. These places have tons of clusters, with lots of vendors throwing hardware at them. They're also often associated with schools, so they're not competitors and they actually -want- people to learn from what they've done.
To get you started:
http://www.ncne.org
http://www.psc.edu
http://www.sdsc.edu
http://www.ncsa.edu
Yeah, it's Pittsburgh-centric. Guess where I'm posting from. There's probably somewhere closer to you.
The things you want to figure out before calling:
-What's your budget? (Nice stuff tends to be more expensive)
-How much does latency matter? (Usually, lots. Sometimes, not so much. Put numbers here.)
-What's your architecture (at several levels of technical detail)? Can you use 64-bit PCI? Do you have to work with a proprietary bus? Can you use full-height, full-length cards? What OS -exactly- are you using? (Hint: "Linux" ain't close enough.) What version and vendor of PVM/MPI/whatever are you using, and can you switch?
--
The 6513 is basically the same thing but with four extra slots.
The 6509 chassis lists at $9.5K and the 6513 $15.25K. That's completely bare bones. The supervisor modules run anywhere from $6K to $28K at list. The 48 port 10/100/1000 modules list at $7.5K while a 24 port SFP fiber blade lists for $15K. You'll need two power supplies at $2K-5K each.
On the cheap end, to get the port density you're looking for out of Cisco, you'll pay about $70K list. But if you find the right reseller, you can see a discount of 30-40%.
All numbers in this post should be considered best guess, based on quotes I've gotten. They may be out of date. They are not official prices from Cisco. Take with the appropriate grain of salt.
Still, with a plan, you only get the best you can imagine. I'd always hoped for something better than that. -CP
We're using the unmanaged HP procurve modular 1Gbps switches in our clusters, but they run VERY HOT when utilized (our switches get hammered 24/7 - like most clusters probably do) and we had some overheating issues with them. Our clusters aren't as large as yours, but I'd suggest going with a major manufacturer (IBM, HP, Cisco) if you're putting all of your eggs in one basket (switch-wise).
One thing is get a switch that's modular (most good ones are), but if something goes out, you'll only loose 8 or 32 nodes instead of the whole switch.
Nortel's Passport 8600 384 ports per chassis, true wire-speed, redundant everything, layer 2-7 switching. Also, if you need more ports simply add another 8600 and use Multi-link-trunking (MLT) between the switches. Wash Rinse Repeat. Networks that use these are smokin!
Of course, if you are looking for the typical Ask Slashdot for free solutions answer you can forget it. These puppies cost a bundle.
try a hickory tree. Stings like hell and the mere thought is a deterrant for most rascals and rapscallions.
isn't almost all the latency in your network from software? why not build a hypertree from cheap 24-port switches? At $200 a pop, you could make a
tree with 12 roots for $8000. spend more to get
more cross-section bandwidth, less for less. it
scales with your budget.
-I like my women like I like my tea: green-
That said, if cost is a factor and you really only need layer-2, we found the Nortel 5510 stackable to be extremely impressive. 48 ports of 10/100/1000, stackable to 8 - manages as a single unit, tons of capacity between switches, great redundancy features and a cost literally less than a quarter of the Cisco's.
Which explains all the dying Cisco 3524's and 2900's I have. Random dead ports, complete lockups, etc. Not that our 3com's are doing any better. For now I'm replacing them with Dell Gigabit switches, cause the price is nice, but I'm looking for something that built for the data-center (Dell's lack an effective backplane interconnect is a big strike). Just wanted to point out Cisco's fail too.
You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.