Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars DVD Box Set Released

dealsites writes "CNN reports that George Lucas is releasing the Star Wars DVD box set early on September 21, 2004 due to piracy concerns. Lucas had intended to release the box set of the original 3 movies after Episode III: Revenge of the Sith was released. However, he mentions that due to piracy concerns the profits are being eaten up and there might not be a market for the films at that time. The box set contains the changes that Lucas has made from the original releases. CNN also reports on the top 5 major changes. Lucas is quoted as saying that he never intends to re-release the original 3 movies in the first CNN link."

5 of 536 comments (clear)

  1. Sure. by Phexro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, the Star Wars franchise is really suffering due to piracy.

    Versus, say, producing two completely crap prequels, oversaturating the tie-in market, and then not releasing the original versions that many people want to buy.

    George Lucas doesn't need any more of your money, and this seems to be reflected by the decisions he has made as of late.

  2. Ehm, logic anyone? by __aagctu1952 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hm, let's see here:
    * Fans are screaming after the original, non-Special Edition version.
    * Lucas admits he's never going to release the original version.

    So, the only way to get the original trilogy, on a decent medium (VHS doesn't count, Laserdisc isn't an option for 99% of the people out there) is through... piracy?

    Now, here comes the big irony:
    * Lucas releases the Star Wars SE DVDs early, over fear for piracy concerns.

    Way to go Lucas!

  3. I don't get it by chrisgeleven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The majority of Slashdot readers seem to be pissed about the greatest trilogy of all-time being released on the most popular video format right now.

    Yes I know it isn't the original trilogy. But the SE is damn close to being it. Some of Lucas' "improvements" are *gasp* actually improvements! Yes, I know it isn't what was originally released, but this is Lucas' story and he owns the rights, so he is allowed to tinker with it until he is satisfied.

    When I watch the SE, I don't vomit, I don't cry, I don't think about some part of my childhood slipping away. The great parts of the movie are still there. Luke meeting Obi-wan, the sunset, meeting Han, saving Leia, Obi-wan vs. Vader, "I am your father", the final duel, etc. It is all there still, just like it was back in the day.

    The movies still give me that chill during certain scenes, where they just touch some part inside that you never knew you had.

    Yes it might not be the originals, but I'll take 99% of the original on DVD over nothing. Maybe if you don't agree you should go watch again with an open mind. Instead of saying "why the fuck did Lucas change this! It isn't the same!" ask yourself "there must be a good reason for this."

    Now I am going to go watch my copy of the trilogy...on DVD!

  4. My feelings on the changes by AndrewStephens · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • Jedi Don't Scream
      This is a good, it sounded stupid. Kudos to Lucas for correcting a mistake
    • Boba Fett has a new voice
      Again, not a bad for consistency.
    • A new and improved Jabba
      Thank god, the SE scene looked incredible dumb. Hopefully they have also removed the Han walking over Jabba's tail bit with some creative editing. Actually, I wish that the whole scene was removed, or greatly shortened since Greedo basically repeats all the information to Han later on.
    • The emperor's new clothes
      Fair enough, since we all know by now that Palpatine is the emperor (or do we...)
    • The big finale
      Everyone seems to be complaining about this, but I think it makes sense. The picture circulating on the net looks a bit stupid though, seeing Christensen smiling untouched at the end looks somehow wrong. He could at least look a bit guilty for wiping out the Jedi. Still the original wasn't much better.
    Final Verdict: mainly positive
    --
    sheep.horse - does not contain information on sheep or horses.
  5. Piracy by here4fun · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In some ways, the studio's are just as unethical as a pirate. They will re-release a movie over and over again. First comes the vanilla version, with maybe a trailer and nothing else. Then comes the Collectors Edition, with a commentary track and production notes. Then comes the Directors Cut with added footage, remastered nontheless. Why can't they release the best version first? Instead, if you want the movie and the extra's, you have to buy it twice. BTW, this all comes after the $10 movie ticket price where popcorn is $5 and a coke is $5 and you have to sit through half an hour of commercials if you want a good seat. Now tell me again, how are the pirates unethical? What money are they taking away from the studios? Clearly piracy ain't cutting in on the movie ticket sales, or any of the special edition sets.

    This is not to say that piracy is good, but considering how the movie studios treat the customers, I don't feel bad for them one but. Maybe if the movie studio's treated me better I would have more sympathy for them (for example, quit with the half hour advertising before a movie). Oh, and my biggest DVD gripe, STOP WITH THE ADVERTISING THAT CAN'T BE SKIPPED.

    BTW, in unreleated news, I was reading that movie studios will now accept advertising in movies. Like in "I, Robot" the studio recieved money for a shoe commercial (converse shoes, I think). What is next? I can just see some of the classic movies, improved with product placement. I can just imagine Citizen Cane where everyone where's nike shoes and drinks Pepsi.