Slashdot Mirror


Does Google Censor Chinese News?

mOoZik writes "A story carried by New Scientist suggests that Google might be playing into the hands of the Chinese government by blocking certain news stories which may be deeded inappropriate. Some users recently reported that Google's Chinese news search returned different results depending when they searched using a computer based outside of China. The claims were substantiated by researchers who connected to computers inside the country. Read on and decide for yourself."

8 of 547 comments (clear)

  1. Do no evil? by diakka · · Score: 5, Informative

    From what I understand, Google already censors their content in other countries like France and Germany. This is only making the news because it's big bad China. Although it kind of does blow apart this image that they like to present as being crusaders of free speech.

    --
    -- Knowledge shared is power lost. -- Aleister Crowley
  2. This is not really news by quigonn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google already censors search results for e.g. Germany, due to sentences spoken out by some German court.

    --
    A monkey is doing the real work for me.
  3. China’s Internet Regulations by phreakv6 · · Score: 5, Informative

    here it is

    --
    fifteen jugglers, five believers
  4. Google's Reply by Andy_R · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the tradition of misleading Slashdot summaries, this one contains only the accusation, not the defence. Here's Google's reply from the article:

    "In order to create the best possible news search experience for our users, we sometimes decide not to include some sites, for a variety of reasons," says a statement issued by the company. "These sources were not included because their sites are inaccessible."

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  5. Does Google Censor American Searches? by Afty0r · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google removed from sites from its' index some time ago due to legal pressure from the Scientology movement using the legal system of the United States of America.

    Is this really news? Almost every country in the world censors now - there are few countries left where you can say anything you want. Welcome to the future, the way it has always been.

  6. Re:The issue is broader here.... by JohnnyNoSPAM · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a very insightful point that you make, and I certainly agree with you.

    It is also important to remember that Google is a company that intends to make money. On the one hand, Google could refuse to adhere to China's censorship. In all honesty, what can Google really do about it? If Google decided to resist the censorship, then surely the Chinese government would pull the plug on its citizens' ability to access it. Complying with Chinese restrictions means that Google will still be accessible to the Chinese people - along with Google's ability to deliver ads which Google hopes will turn a profit. Compliance means that there is still a Chinese market; noncompliance means that there is a whole country from which they cannot earn revenue.

    Still, "Google" is becoming a household name, as it were, and is to the point where people use it as a verb. Some examples of that are "'why don't you google for that information?" or "... we google as easily as we breathe ..." I believe that an underlying concern among many people (although not specifically mentioned) is that Google may become powerful enough through its tremendous influence among its Internet users that it could easily become subject to corporate influences which come more to benefiting the investors than the users.

    On the other hand, that's the beauty of choice. If Google becomes any sort of apparition whom we do not like, then there are other search engines eager to catch our interests. Likewise, some good old fashioned research (such as books, news papers, magazines, and other information available at local libraries) never hurts anyone.

  7. Re:rephrase by cicho · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, because they were already doing so in 2002.

    --
    "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
  8. Re:That's just business.. by mirio · · Score: 5, Informative

    And those that shamelessly ass-lick everything that the US does (Britain, for one) no matter how inconsiderate it is to international laws makes it something to think about.

    Ok, class. One more time. There is no such thing as international law. There are international treaties, such as the UN charter...but a law a treaty does not make.

    To have a law assumes that there is some governmental body to enforce that law. The UN is not a government entity. It is a forum for discussing various issues in an international setting, yet no country has surrendered it's sovreignty to the UN (although I feel that many would like to).

    I don't hate the UN, I just think people should look at it for what it really is.