Slashdot Mirror


New California Law Bans Anonymous Media File Sharing

An anonymous reader writes "It looks like California will soon be requiring emails to share files. The story from SF Gate has a few details as Ahnold goes on his signing spree in Sacramento. 'Aiding the industry that helped him gain worldwide fame, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed legislation Tuesday aimed at discouraging online piracy by requiring anyone disseminating movies or music on the Internet to disclose their e-mail address.' Also he signed a bill to limit the sale of video games."

4 of 679 comments (clear)

  1. Violation of rights? by uchi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it just me, or is it a violation of your rights(as an American)? I can think of situations where I could be sharing perfectly legal media, and would not want my email address/identity tied to it. For example, if I produced a documentary about how bad the company I work for is, I should be able to disperse that to those who please. There would most definitely be reprecussions if it was found out who made it, and this bill would just make it all the easier.

  2. Information wants to be free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    as in beer.

    Does Californica not realize that the Internet will treat this as damage, and route around it? You can't make your tiny part of the Internet have different rules than the rest of the Internet. It just doesn't work. Unenforceable.

  3. What about my own music or video? by dmeranda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This seems like it's making the same old assumptions. That *if* it's music or video, then the copyright *must* be owned by RIAA/MPAA. This is all about control, not copyrights.

    If I own the copyright (say because I produced it), or I have the permission of the copyright owner (which may be, gasp, somebody besides the **AA); then WHY in the world can't I do with it what I want? I certainly can give somebody a copy of a book in secrety; or even leave a copy of a newspaper on my chair when I'm done reading it (which is anonymous distribution).

    Oh, and what about PUBLIC DOMAIN media files?

    See, this whole thing still seems to be the big media industries trying to shut out independent artisits and producers of content. The whole piracy thing is just a smokescreen; the excuse. What they really want is to make it illegal or impossible for anybody besides them to "traffic" in media.

  4. Lots of questions by LS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    * Who is the email provided to?
    * How is the email to be provided?
    * Is this only for legal files haring? (I would assume so)
    * How are email addresses verified?
    * If the file sharing app has to provide a way to advertise an email, does this make app incapable of this illegal?
    * Are FTP and websites affected by this law?
    * What if I don't have an email address?
    * What if my address is with Yahoo? Will my information be required to be given to lawyers by Yahoo or whomever my ISP is?
    * How did this law get passed?

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie