Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Interview with Camino Developer Mike Pinkerton

Posted by michael on from the anything-but-ie dept.

An anonymous reader writes "As someone who has used Camino for much of the time since the OS X-centric Gecko browser was released, I've been hoping to see it hit version 1.0 (it's at 0.8 now). ArsTechnica has an interview with Mike Pinkerton, the lead developer for Camino in which he talks about the history and future of Camino along with his thoughts on Safari and Firefox."

4 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. KHTML vs. Gecko by thirteenVA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Camino is a good browser, but once khtml matures its likely to outperform the gecko engine.

    For me the biggest difference is that safari still chokes on pages that the gecko engine will not but with the determination and skill of the Safari team this will not be the case for long.

    Safari is my default browser since its beta, and my money is on them for the long term. However it is really nice to have options.

  2. OmniWeb by metalligoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first commercial web browser, originally written for the platform the WWW was invented on, is still the best. OmniWeb has more features than any other browser.

    I couldn't imagine using anything else, but if I had to use another browser, it would be FireFox. I don't care if my browser is integrated with Address Book. FireFox does almost everything OW does. Camino is stuck in a strange no-mans land, and with Safari out there, Camino will remain a nitch browser.

    Safari is for average users. OmniWeb is for people that want amazing features. FireFox is for power users that want a free and open source browser. Camino just doesn't bring anything vital to the table.

    1. Re:OmniWeb by thirteenVA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I couldn't imagine using anything else...

      And I can't imagine paying for a browser... otherwise I'd be using Opera.

    2. Re:OmniWeb by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, of course, you just expect to get something for nothing, right? There's a reason why OmniWeb and Opera charge for their browsers -- they offer more powerful applications with a wider range of features. And of course, they don't fund their development from operating system sales or random volunteer work...

      Did you ever try using OmniWeb? Do you have any idea how many features have been packed into that little package?