Slashdot Mirror


Digital Music Eyewear From Oakley

Mecha-A writes "Am I the only one that finds this insanely awesome? Oakley is marketing a new line of digital music eyewear in time for the holidays. $400-$500 is an obscene lot for a small USB MP3 player, but the coolness factor is way up there. Questions: Is a brand name like Oakley going to get this idea off the ground? Who's going to be first to market this same thing except with a 'now playing' HUD on the sunglasses?"

2 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Paying for "Oakley" not MP3 player by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, I paid £2.99 for a pair of decent looking sunglasses with all the protection needed. I don't think that the word "Oakley" is worth multipying that figure by 100.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  2. Re:Paying for "Oakley" not MP3 player by Misinformed · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I am not one to believe that "money = quality". But I also refuse to accept the counterculture view that "money = luxurious waste">

    Hey fuckwit, did you fail to read my post in full, fail to understand it, or just spout off some opinion, becuase you have that opinion, relevent or not. A communication requires responce to something conjectured previously, not unrelated opinion for the sake of it.

    FOAD, motherfucker.

    --
    --

    Slashdot: Racism against Indians OK. China bad, USA good. Blue pill in water supply.