Voting A Class Requirement For Some At Drew
timrichardson writes "A Quaker literature professor at Drew University tried to make voting at the US Presidential elections a requirement for her English Lit class. NY Times has the story (free registration required)."
Honestly, how can you prove that you voted? Unless she makes everybody present one of those "I voted today" stickers they hand out at the voting centers.
An interesting aside to this article, Fox reporters harrassed students trying to register their peers to vote in Arizona..
"Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
Mod ctr2sprt up!
This is the exact point i got from RTFA.
The students are not forced to vote, but the prof is encouraging voting by letting the students know that it will somehow affect their grade.
TFA is short and at the end u get the idea that the prof's ulterior motive is to start a dialog on campus, not FORCE students to vote.
I'd be more interested in the voter turnout for the campus vs last year's turnout...
------ no thanks... I've quit
She said she'd grade generously and on the honor system. She requires them to register, go to the polling place, and enter the booth. She does not tell them who to vote for, she does not require them to vote. It's sort of like a field trip where they can participate if they'd like, but if they just watch and learn something about the process, that's fine, too.
Her goal is to provoke discussion. So far, no students have dropped the course.
If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
Where's the freedom in forced voting? As Americans, is it not the right of the people not only to decide *whom* they're going to vote for, but *whether* they will vote at all?
Granted, this is a private school, and if they are funded strictly by private funds, then they can legitimately make this a requirement (students can go to other universities if they disagree with the requirement). But if the university receives government funding in any way - for research, etc. - then they are not wholly-privately-funded, they are funded in part by the public as well, and thus should be subject to the same 1st Amendment rights that government entities are.
Is Capitalism Good for the Poor?
Umm requireing me to vote for a grade is harassing, offensive, and I would imagine illegal. A teacher can no more require a student to vote than an employer can..
Why is the fact that she's a Quaker relevant, anyway?)
Because the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) has a LONG history of social activism and one of the cores of Quakerism is the belief that every individual counts and it is important that each person act according to his or her conscience.
Quakers have been at the forefront of political movements to empower individuals and recognize equality since the 1600's, when George Fox started them. (For example, Susan B. Anthony was a Quaker.)
I don't know the usa laws about this, but in any free nation you could get smacked with charges of some kind for pulling off this kinda stunt
Actually, in some countries (like Australia) voting is compulsory and you pay a fine if you don't vote.
"Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)