Europeans To Monitor American Voters
shonagon53 writes "The United States is known as being the world's most stable democracy. But since the Florida 2000 fiasco, things have changed.
Europe's famous Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe
(OSCE) will now be monitoring the U.S. elections. The institution normally monitors elections in third world countries in transition, and in crisis areas or regions where civil wars have destabilized the political process. In november, the OSCE will be monitoring local and state elections in Kazakhstan, Skopje, Eastern Congo, Ouagadougou and... the United States.
As
the BBC reports, for some Americans this comes as a humiliation; others see it as a necessity, since they have lost trust in the American election process."
As a sovereign nation, our elections are our own business.
On the contrary, treaty provisions are given priority over the United States Code, and the Constitution assigned foreign affairs to the federal government. The monitoring provisions under the OSCE have the full force of law.
I will withold comment as to whether Republicans stand to gain by claiming treaty provisions are invalid.
What always confuses me, as an outsider, is why so often in discussions about the political system in America, the opinions of the 'founding fathers' are invoked as a standard by which the current situation can be gauged in terms of its democratic legitimacy. Who cares what they thought, or what their purposes were in setting up obscure systems like the electoral college?
Ah, the arrogance of the young ... the past can hold no wisdom for us, we are so sophisticated and wise now ...
For one thing, the states only agreed to join the union based on the compromises and assurances of the founding fathers. You may think that it is OK to just chuck that out once the deed was done, but it doesn't seem quite right to me ("whoops, sorry Vermont! We were just kidding about keeping huge population centers from making all the decisions. Hope you don't mind").