Congressional Elections - Who's Good for IT Folks?
rlp asks: "Most of the articles appearing in Slashdot's new political section pertain to the U.S. Presidential election. However, most of the political issues facing American IT people are issues that are dealt with (or more often caused by) Congress. Therefore, my question is: who are the heroes and villains (for U.S. IT people) in Congress that are running for office this year? How does your local Congresscritter (or the person running against them) feel about copyrights, privacy, data security, H1-B, outsourcing, software patents, Open Source, tech education, R&D funding, anti-trust, etc?"
Doesn't really matter, because IT has become such a neccessity, and such a commodity, that it's silly to say "who should I vote for? who will support IT the most?". It's a non-issue. It's like saying "gee, which party will support accountants more?" or "which party supports telephone use?". It just isn't one of those economic sectors thats on one side of the spectrum politically, like trial lawyers.
Life is hard, and the world is cruel
There is no bigger geek rockstar in the House than my representative, Rep. Rick Boucher (VA-09). The guy advocates the protection of Fair Use, a Digital Milennium Consumers' Rights Act, opposes the DOJ's anti-P2P work, proposed a great anti-spam act in 2003 (it didn't pass; that crappy CAN-SPAM did, instead), he sponsored the Digital Media Consumers' Rights Act, and he testifies before various House committees all the time, representing, effectively, Slashdot. :) See the Internet section of his House site for more information. Alternately, you could see any of the Slashdot stories about him from over the years, including Slashdot | Rep. Boucher Outlines 'Fair Use' Fight, Boucher's Anti-DMCA Bill Gets High Profile Allies, Anti Spamming Act 2001 Proposed, and Webcasting and the DMCA.
:)
:)
;)
Hell, Boucher guest blogged for Larry Lessig a few weeks ago, and the stuff that he wrote about is like a Slashdotter's wet dream.
He doesn't talk about these things in his campaign literature -- much of the very-rural, poor population of southwest Virginia just wouldn't care. Read over his campaign website and you'll find more about the tobacco buyout, healthcare and tourism than technology.
And everybody else in the House sucks.
-Waldo Jaquith
Let's just say he's the only guy in Congress to vote AGAINST the Patriot Act. From his website (russfeingold.org): Senator Feingold supported 90% of the provisions of the PATRIOT Act, but too many provisions were deeply troubling. Certain provisions may infringe on the rights of law-abiding citizens, while doing little protect our country against terrorists. If he ever runs for President, he's got my vote.
You want a job? Vote Republican. I know that's hard for liberal slashdot to swallow, but it's the truth.
No, it isn't.
In fact, we're better with neither .
But it might help get an idea of where people stand:
www.vote-smart.org lets you look up the voting records of Concresscritters.
http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
This Bill O'Reilly? Why would anyone want to vote for a clown with such skewed view of reality?
Yet Another Web Site
Just visit Issue s 2000 (2004)</a> and checkout how candidates voted on technology issues.
-----
One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
http://www.opensecrets.org/ is a great place to find out what organizations and industries are giving the most $$ to each candidate.
There's a lot more content than that there, check it out.
- Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -