Slashdot Mirror


RNC Outsourced Voter Database to India

roj3 writes "PCWorld and other sources are covering the story of how the Republican Party outsourced work on their massive Voter Vault project to India. "When the Republican Party clinched close gubernatorial races in Mississippi and Kentucky in 2003, it relied heavily on its Voter Vault database to get people to the voting booths. Though party officials are tight-lipped about what's inside the Vault, they've acknowledged it contains records on an estimated 168 million voters. ... PC World has recently learned that the major development work on the Voter Vault was done in India." The work, done by Compulink Systems of Maharashtra, occurred during the same time that a Russian hacker (RyDen) compromised their site. Thankfully, they are pretty sure that no data was compromised. Who do you trust less with your personal information, marketers or politicians?"

6 of 57 comments (clear)

  1. Public information by crow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember, the parties don't have any special access to private information. I would expect that everything in this database was pulled from data in the public record. This is probably similar to databases used for gerrymandering. They have the voting results for every race by precinct. They have demographic information for every block from the census data. They have voter registration data (it's public record). They can correlate all of that to determine where they should go to get more voters that will likely support them.

  2. We need a FOIA for non-gov entities by nharmon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think I should have a right to know what kind of data a private organization has about me.

  3. Am I the only one reading this thinking... by (trb001) · · Score: 1, Insightful

    so?

    Iverson says the RNC hired a different Seattle company, Advanced Data Center Systems, to perform work on its Voter Vault.

    So they hired a Seattle firm that turned around and subcontracted its work to someone else. It's not government data, it's not classified, and the "leak" could've happened here. I don't see the relevance.

    --trb

  4. What a misleading article by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Insightful


    The post makes it sound like the GOP went "Fuck Americans, we're going to build this thing with cheap labor! Ah ha ha ha!"

    RTFA....directly from the PC World piece...

    "Two years prior to the 2002 elections, the RNC hired Advanced Custom Software (ACS) of Seattle to build a Web-based database to help campaign workers target likely Republican voters. According to information posted on Elance.com, an online directory of outsourcing firms, ACS subcontracted development of the database to Compulink Systems of Maharashtra, India."

    It's a fair bet that when the GOP found out about the outsourcing (and the fact that ACS is basically nothing but a front company for Indian firms), THEY put a stop to it. Also from the article:

    "...all work done on Voter Vault since 2002 has occurred in the U.S."

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  5. Re:For Shame... by Hassman · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...meanwhile, the GOP would like to strip you of all your freedoms while calling it 'Patriotic'.

    I just read this today, there is a movement in the party to start monitoring people who pray at mosques. Why? Because of their religion.

    Yea, since when do we need freedoms to be free anyway?

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  6. So what? by Quinn · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Kerry's still going to lose.

    Instead of scraping the bottom of the barrel for muck now, you should have offered a decent presidential candidate last year. We all have the Democrats to blame for four more years of Bush.

    This reply is as relevant as the story to which it is attached.

    --
    #19845