Slashdot Mirror


Open Source Speech Recognition - With Source

Paul Lamere writes " This story on ZD-Net and this recent story on Slashdot describes the recent open sourcing of IBM's voice recognition software. This release, unfortunately, doesn't include any source for the actual speech recognition engine. Olaf Schmidt, a developer on the KDE Accessibility Project , is quoted as saying 'There is no speech-recognition system available for Linux, which is a big gap.' In an attempt to close this gap, we have just released Sphinx-4, a state-of-the-art, speaker-independent, continuous speech recognition system written entirely in the Java programming language. It was created by researchers and engineers from Sun, CMU, MERL, HP, MIT and UCSC. Despite (or because of) being written in the Java programming language, Sphinx-4 performs as well as similar systems written in C. Here are the release notes and some performance data."

11 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. Speech Recognition is a Mature Technology. by reporter · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    This release, unfortunately, doesn't include any source for the actual speech recognition engine.

    What is the problem? Speech recognition is a mature technology, and algorithms for speech recognition are well documented in the research journals. The federal government has long since stopped funding research into speech recognition.

    If you want to code some speech recognition software for Linux, just get a good book on C# (which is an open standard, unlike Java) and photocopy some relevant papers from the IEEE Transaction journals.

    1. Re:Speech Recognition is a Mature Technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
      You sound like a Chinese or an Indian. Stop acting like one. Act like a Westerner.

      If you do not understand digital signal processing, then you will not be able to read the IEEE Transactions.

      The grandparent post is intended for someone who actually understands digital signal processing and Fourier transforms.

  2. Re:withOUT source surely? by Lord+Kano · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    You are a dumb ass. Not only did you not RTFA, you didn't even read the fucking summary.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  3. Re:Java comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Give it up. Java sucks and is dead and dying worse than BSD. Only loser programmers clinging to their shithole jobs still write in Java. I get Java losers coming over to me all the time asking how they can get into .NET. I just laugh at them. I tell them it is too late... they stayed in Java this long, and they are now un-employable. Good luck punks. LOL

  4. Good job... Now port it to a real language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Give it up. Java sucks and is dead and dying worse than BSD. Only loser programmers clinging to their shithole jobs still write in Java. I get Java losers coming over to me all the time asking how they can get into .NET. I just laugh at them. I tell them it is too late... they stayed in Java this long, and they are now un-employable. Good luck punks. LOL!

  5. Re:Java comment by AuMatar · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Because it isn't, Java is still one of the slowest languages in widespread use. I know you Java diehards want to believe its fast, but it isn't.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  6. Re:The Myth Must Die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Give it up. Java sucks and is dead and dying worse than BSD. Only loser programmers clinging to their shithole jobs still write in Java. I get Java losers coming over to me all the time asking how they can get into .NET. I just laugh at them. I tell them it is too late... they stayed in Java this long, and they are now un-employable. Good luck punks. LOL...

  7. Re:Interesting side note by papercrane · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Cheap, cheap link there. Did you read the terms?

    1. Receipt of Product
    (a) Gratis Internet does not guarantee receipt of any product regardless of offers completed or referrals accumulated.

  8. Re:withOUT source surely? by ratpack91 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Yup I'm sincerely sorry about the mods around here. Your parent gets +1 Informative and +1 insightful while you get flamebait!!!???

    What is happening to this place? Has the price of crack fallen or something. Anyway I here you.

  9. Re:But what about text to speech? by merdark · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    By we I assume you mean "the open source community" and the answer is "when you get off your ass and code it".

    This comment is great. The arrogance of many open source people astounds me.

    Non-programmer: Hey, I switch to this open source stuff which you say is better. It's cool, but it really needs feature X.

    Arrogant-open-source-programmer: That's the beuty of open source. You can get off your ass and code it yourself!

    Outcome: Non-programmer can't code it. Arrogant-open-source-programmer continues to scratch his itch. As a result, we have 10 thousand poor ass themes and numerous barely functional programs for each task. But what would be best is at least ONE good, working, application for each task.

    So to you a "community" is a bunch of people who only do things which they themselves want and never help each other? Weird.

  10. Re:Virtual Machine Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    So all the things that are great about java are the things that it doesn't have right now?