Slashdot Mirror


EFF Releases Copyright Guide for P2P Developers

An anonymous reader writes "Now that the courts have ruled that P2P services are legal, the EFF has released a legal guide for those wishing to start such a service, but are unfamiliar with the parameters that will keep the copyright cartel off their back."

2 of 17 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Useful Non-infringing Use by seinman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I run a website where I produce lots of video and audio clips. I can't afford the bandwidth to have them all downloaded from my server. So I use DirectConnect (and soon, Bit Torrent) to distribute the higher quality, and therefore larger file size, content. At worst, the visitor downloads the file at the speed of my connection. And when other people are around sharing, things speed up. Completely legal and very inexpensive. Please explain to me how this is not a legitimate use.

    Obviously, I understand that the majority of P2P traffic is illegal in nature. But by saying "has yet to have any legitimate use" (emphasis mine) implies that all of it is illegal. Which is not the case.

  2. Re:Useful Non-infringing Use by OWJones · · Score: 2, Informative

    I said there has not been any substantial useful use. I imply that p2p is either infringing or useless, not illegal.

    If you really want, I can get you the bittorrent statistics from Duke's Red Hat mirror. I'd argue that its use is substantial, and has been for nearly two years now.