Slashdot Mirror


Survey: SOA Prominent On 2005 budgets

Michael S. Mimoso writes "A Yankee Group survey of 473 enterprise decision makers reveals that companies have put aside money for service-oriented architectures for 2005." This is a bigger deal than it sounds - if companies keep moving this away, it will mean a sea change in corporate technology usage - and change the way/why development is done. We're talking everything from SOAP stuff (ITMJ is part of OSTG) to wholesale ASP adoption like Salesforce.com.

15 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A Yankee Group survey of 473 enterprise decision makers reveals that companies have put aside money for service-oriented architectures for 2005." This is a bigger deal then it sounds.

    Why does it have to be a bigger deal before it sounds? Why does a service contract have to make any sound? Can't that step be taken out entirely? It seems to me that companies can save money that way.

  2. My head hurts. by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it me, or does that article spend a page and lots of big words to basicly say nothing?

  3. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  4. Holy cow by Scott+Ransom · · Score: 5, Funny

    That is one of the most jargon and/or marketing-speak filled story descriptions that I have ever read on /. I have absolutely no desire to waste my time looking up those acronyms in order to see if I _might_ want to RTFA.

    Thanks for the great submission.

    1. Re:Holy cow by jedaustin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you haven't tried bullfighter (from the guys at deloitte) and are use word/powerpoint at the office, you'll love it.

      According the the bullfighter Index, the article gets:
      Bull Composite Index of 5.9 (not horrible)
      Bull index of 94 (good)
      Average sentence length (good)
      Syllables/word (ok).

      And the part I love.. the Flesh score.. 36:
      Diagnosis: Teetering on the edge of unclear. The overall meaning remains discernible, but it becomes possible to lose oneself in corollary thoughts, which may be worth exploration, but which can also detract from the core point of the written article.

      Anyway.. off topic but fun.

      JD

  5. Re:um by Scarblac · · Score: 4, Funny

    SOA still means "start of authority" to me

    That's nothing, in Dutch it's the acronym for sexually transmitted disease... I had never heard of this buzzword meaning either.

    --
    I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
  6. Let me be the first to ask by katsiris · · Score: 5, Funny

    Soa what?

  7. Re:I concur. by strictfoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    This calls for Dack.com's Web Economy Bullshit Generator

    Some quick examples:
    reintermediate bricks-and-clicks partnerships
    brand e-business action-items
    orchestrate visionary interfaces

    Using this tool we can quickly create:
    Using SOA we can engineer wireless web services to deliver frictionless communities. It will allow us to optimize out-of-the-box portals and extend our enterprise models. If we monetize viral convergence we can synergize customized relationships and utilize matrix efficient infrastructures. SOA will enable us to reintermediate compelling e-business thus increasing our ROI. Our TCO will be minimied due to the increasing ability to drive magnetic markets.

    --
    I've just signed legislation that'll outlaw Russia forever. We'll begin bombing in five minutes.
  8. Inconceivable! by Yo+Grark · · Score: 5, Funny

    Inigo: [looking confused] You keep using acronyms I do not think they mean what you think they mean...[looking back down] my god...his whole article is like that.

    Vizzini: Whoever he is, he's obviously seen us with the slashdot factor and therefore thinks his webserver must die. You [to Fezzik] read the article. We'll [to Inigo] head straight for the first posts. Catch up when it's meta-moderated. If his webserver fails, fine; if not, the use the wiki.

    Inigo: I'm going to do him in with bug-me-not.

    Vizzini: You know what a hurry we're in!

    Inigo: Well, it is the only way I my anominity can be satisfied. If I use my right name, the spam will come too quickly.

    Vizzini: Oh have it your way.

    Fezzik: [to Inigo] You be careful. People in marketing cannot be trusted.

    Yo Grark

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
  9. Erm... by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny

    "A Yankee Group survey of 473 enterprise decision makers reveals that companies have put aside money for service-oriented architectures for 2005." This is a bigger deal then it sounds - if companies keep moving this away, it will mean a sea change in corporate technology usage - and change the way/why development is done. We're talking everything from SOAP stuff (ITMJ is part of OSTG) to whole sale ASP adoption like Salesforce.com."

    473 enterprise decision makers? How many best-of-breed synergized Libraries of Congress is that?

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  10. SOA, ERP, SAP, CRM, IBM, COO and CFO by Mignon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a feeling this is what the legendary TPS report looks like. But they left off the cover sheet.

  11. Re:um by Mateito · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Fersht predicted that during the next 12 months more companies will try to bring SOAs across an entire enterprise and then explore integration with the entire value chain. Vendor evangelism will help accelerate that process,

    May I be the first to say "WTF".

    SOA may be something useful. Unfortunately (?), this article does nothing to explain what it is, only that you need it, your business needs it, and if you don't you are going to be left behind all those other companies that allready have it.

    I gotta invent me something like this, make it cool, and make a mint flogging it.

    However, posting it to slashdot WILL NOT be my preferred manner of drumming up business.

  12. Hmm by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny
    Widespread adoption of SOAP by developers would make a difference.

    Particularly for the guys riding with them on the bus.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  13. Re:ASPs by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As opposed to the current model for enterprise software:

    The vendor sells you the app and comes in and sets it up incorrectly. The guy who got the training and all of the manuals gets a better job and leaves. You didn't buy a service agreement, so you don't have the updates that you need. You have to set the clock back to 1998, because its not Y2K. And it only runs on Windows NT, Service pack 2, with constant attention required to keep the log files from overflowing.

  14. Re:um by starm_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its a new way of doing something that has been done well since forever but now in XML. So that means it is better and will change the world.