Slashdot Mirror
Russia to Ratify Kyoto Treaty
Repran writes "The Guardian reports that politicians, industry leaders and environment groups across the world welcomed the news last night that Russia had rejuvenated international efforts to combat climate change by ratifying the Kyoto protocol."
Exactly! Plus it gives them some karma at a time where people are starting to say they are going back to communist era policies and ways.
Granted they had to throw in the requisite George Bush jab, who by the way wasn't President when the Senate rejected the Kyoto treaty 98-0. No President is going to get past that majority.
.7 of an inch? Glaciers? Ignoring the issue that some of them were bigger in times where the planet was hotter?
The key here is money. Russia has something they can sell. They need money and what better way to obtain it?
Which brings up the point, whats the use of a treaty if you can just buy yourself a pass? What use is a treaty that excepts certain countries from the requirements?
Also, sea level rise is how much in the last half century?
When the science behind Kyoto gets real proof then come back with the treaty. what we have is an anti-industrialist agenda which convienent opts out some of the upcoming bigger polluters.
* Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
Now all we need is the biggest polluter in the world, with 5% of the population generating 25% of the pollution to finally grow up and ratify it as well...
Meanwhile, China and India are still exempt and have absolutly no restrictions and can emit all the greenhouse gas they damn well please. Looks like your policy vacuum is alive and well.
Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.
This is bad for the welfare of humanity. The Copenhagen Consensus has ranked climate measures, especially Kyoto, as "bad", dead last behind AIDS, Malaria, malnutrition, free trade, clean water, economic freedom, and migration measures in ratio of social benefit to cost. The more climate research that is done the more evidence we find against human caused global warming. But once an environmental movement is started, no amount or reason can stop it.
Kyoto will help the environment by at most 0.02 Celsius by 2050. It will also be bad for the environment as more people worry more about CO2 and less about real air pollution that causes acid rain and other environmental damage, and less about more significant greenhouse gases like dihydrogen-monoxide and methane. Many Americans have already been completely ignoring the reductions in pollutants like NO2, O3, SO2, CO, and PM in the U.S. before and during the Bush administration when attacking him for not supporting CO2 reductions. Also Kyoto will increase energy prices in clean energy-efficient countries shifting more manufacturing to dirty inefficient energy-consuming developing countries like China, causing more global pollution.
Umm china is one of the most coal (thats burning the plants dinosaurs ate) burning nations on the planet. And china is quickly! becoming an industrial powerhouse. Heck as it is they use coal for 75% of their power! I guess because its not in an SUV youre ok with ignoring that eh?
As for India, Kyoto focuses more on power generation than fuel from personal conveynances (because more pollution comes from the former), guess who else gets more than 75% of their fuel from coal, ta daaa, India.
But lets make the case that your right and China and India dont really pollute *why exempt them*? or any other developing nation. If your point is that because we drive SUV's and they dont they dont matter why specifically make them exempt?
But your right to stick your head up your ass and squeal 'no fair' while having enough food on your table is yours to have and to hold.
Thank you, you have just in a nutshell pointed out what Kyoto is all about. Its not about the environment (otherwise not signee would be exempt) its about 'global justice' and the fact I am fed and fat... Thats the problem with Kyoto it was never a serious attempt to decrease pollution, it was an attempt to balance the global socio-economic scales by imposing restrictions on the growth of first world nations while letting developing nations pollute as much as they want..
Vetoing the administration report that showed that climate change had a human component for a start.
Link? I was not aware one could veto a report... I thought one had to veto a law..