Slashdot Mirror


Genome Methods Applied to Reverse-Engineering

L1TH10N writes "Wired news has an article on a truely innovative way of analysing network protocol reverse-engineering. Marshall Beddoe, a security analyst, is using algorithms used in bioinformatics to analyse closed-source and secret network protocols which he calls "Protocol Informatics".According to Beddoe, network conversations are full of "junk" -- usually the actual data being sent -- which interferes with the analysis of the occasional command sequence that controls what to do with that junk. This has parrallels with Bioinformatics that has to deal with a similar problem of finding known DNA sequences separated by long gaps of unknown data. Biologists have devised complex algorithms to discover whether DNA sequences are descended from the same ancestors by comparing the genetic differences with the known mutation rates of certain DNA components. Beddoe applied the same principles to mutating network conversations of evolving network protocols."

2 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. DNA vs. DMCA by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    You can't reverse engineer the genome: some of the genes are patented! Nevermind the prior art in your mom's nuclei, they literally own your ass - you've just got a limited license to use it. When they release the retrovirus with the broadcast flag flipped on, finally every Slashdotter's dream of "baby licenses" will be possible.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  2. Re:Network Protocols vs. Building Blocks of Life by DLWormwood · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    After all, (without getting into a religious debate, here) man was not created by man

    Funny, I was taught that every person now alive was created by man, or more exactly, was created by man and woman.

    Don't make me explain why... it's kind of gross, and outside the domain of most /.'ers anyway.

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled