FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7 Released; 5.3-RELEASE Soon

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7 Released; 5.3-RELEASE Soon

Posted by timothy on Wednesday October 6, 2004 @01:34AM from the film-at-11-back-to-you-in-new-york dept.

hugo_pt writes "The FreeBSD Release Engineering Team is proud to announce the availability of FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7. This is the seventh and final BETA of the 5.3 release cycle. Fixes and enhancements made since BETA6: fix timekeeping on sparc64 and alpha that would result in the day of the week being stored incorrectly in NVRAM; add support to the fxp driver for the ICH6 chipset; fix the panic on detach problem with USB hubs; import BIND 9.3.0, this completely replaces the old BIND 8.x nameserver in the base system; fix panic when allocating swap on a busy system; fix loader crash when using the 'lsdev' command.... You can read the release announcement, and download the beta ISO." (ISO 1, ISO 2)

16 of 76 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Close to FreeBSD 5.3 by Anonymous Coward · 2004-10-06 01:45 · Score: 5, Interesting

I am a long time Slackware Linux fan, and I have been looking extensively at FreeBSD. I wish to try FreeBSD, and I would like some of my newer supported devices (wireless ones, to be more precise), to be supported. Is it time to take the *BSD plunge? Does FreeBSD support a large enough database of hardware to give a try, even with strange and obscure devices?
1. Re:Close to FreeBSD 5.3 by the+real+darkskye · 2004-10-06 02:02 · Score: 5, Informative
  
  FreeBSD 5.3 supports Project Evil, ala NDIS support.
  It can take binary windows drivers for a majority of networking hardware and use them to run the device.
  
  Information on Project Evil can be found at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ndis&apro pos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.0-current&format =html
  
  --
  Music is everybody's possession.
  It's only publishers who think that people own it.
  Fuck Beta
  ~John Lenno
2. Re:Close to FreeBSD 5.3 by JQuick · 2004-10-06 02:21 · Score: 5, Informative
  
  "Newer supported devices" is uselessly vague, as you are aware. Adding the words "wireless one" is more detailed, but not as you state, "more precise".
  
  Wireless could still mean almost anything. IRDA, 802.11*, bluetooth, heck you might be talking about anything from a mouse or a keyboard to an interface to an amateur packet radio band (via short wave). As a result, though I would like to provide an answer, I cannot. I can only make it easier for you to find it on your own.
  
  FreeBSD supports a wide range of devices. Note however that FreeBSD strive for quality over quantity, and that your particular hardware may not be well supported yet, if supported at all. You should look at the hardware support page for the release you want to run. (version and host architecture)
  
  For FreeeBSD 5.x on intel that page is:
  
  http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/5-STABLE/hardwar e/ i386/index.html
  
  It list all the hardware specific release notes for the i386 architecture, including motherboard, processors, and devices.
  
  The device page covering everything from mice to raid controllers is:
  http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/5-STABLE/hard ware/ i386/support.html
  
  Does it support strange and obscure devices?
  Yes.
  Does it support your strange and obscure device?
  I don't know, take a look and see. Good luck, I hope you give it a try. It's a very nice environment.
3. Re:Close to FreeBSD 5.3 by TheRaven64 · 2004-10-06 04:20 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  The FreeBSD hardware support lists are not always particularly accurate. I own a wireless card and a sound card, neither of which is listed as being supported by the hardware list, but both listed by the drivers' man pages (and both work). If you can't find the device you're looking for in the hardware list, take a look at the man pages of similar devices (linked to from the hardware compatibility list pages).
  
  --
  I am TheRaven on Soylent News
4. Re:Close to FreeBSD 5.3 by VVelox · 2004-10-06 07:12 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  There is also a NDIS wrapper in 5.x. This allows NDIS drivers from windows to be used. Here are the links to the man pages. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ndis&apro pos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.0-current&format =html http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ndiscvt&s ektion=8&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.0-current
5. Re:Close to FreeBSD 5.3 by simonln · 2004-10-06 19:39 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  The FreeBSD hardware support lists are not always particularly accurate. I own a wireless card and a sound card, neither of which is listed as being supported by the hardware list, but both listed by the drivers' man pages (and both work).
  
  Actually that has changed with FreeBSD 5.3. Now (most of) the Hardware Notes are generated from the manual pages, so the Hardware Notes for FreeBSD 5.3 should be much more accurate then for previous releases.
  
  The i386 Hardware Notes for 5.3(-BETA) can be found at http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/5-STABLE/hardware/ i386/article.html
Keep in mind by agent+dero · 2004-10-06 03:14 · Score: 4, Interesting

remember that 5.3 has a good chance of becoming -STABLE (by good chance, I am really making an assumption based on how 5.2 has progressed, etc)

FreeBSD is making good progress in SMP, and a lot more backend stuff than is noticable to most. I'm looking forward to running a 5-STABLE branch on my main (dual Xeon) server.

Thanks guys :)

--
Error 407 - No creative sig found
1. Re:Keep in mind by devphaeton · 2004-10-06 04:31 · Score: 4, Interesting
  
  So far in my experience, i do not see any ensuckulation for 5.x.... Granted, i'm not an overly experienced FreeBSD user, though.
  
  But for doing the usual things on the most usual hardware (like probably 90% of the BSD and Linux users would) it seems to be quite a pleasant and well-done computing experience, IMHO...
  
  If there are issues with 5.x, either i'm not doing the things that cause them, or i'm oblivious to them, because i'm seriously considering wiping my Debian installation from my main workstation when 5.3 is officially released.
  
  The only issues i've ever had with FreeBSD in the past is that i'm wined and dined with some of the more `current' or special features that are easily available in Linux- Things in the past like AA fonts for X11, games like quakeforge (kinda buggy on fbsd), mozilla-firebird, vmware, libSDL, etc... No effort to make it go, just apt-get install it and it works.
  
  Some of these things are now available in FreeBSD, and some of the applications in Ports have caught up in version numbers, and as for the rest, i probably just need to put a little more effort into making it work ;)
  
  Linux has always been good to me, i have no complaints or regrets about my years of running Slackware and Debian, but FreeBSD just seems so much more *elegant* in a lot of ways. The installation, the administration, the documentation, the overall smoothness...
  
  Well, that and the Linux Zealotry is getting out of hand. Every camp has their zealots, but some of the latest Linux ones (we all know who) are really making it hard for me to keep the faith. I know i shouldn't pay any attention to them, and it's just a vocal minority, but it's hard to remember these things when everywhere you look on the web (or slashdot, heaven forbid!) there is all this half-cocked stupidity in your face. The lack of zealotry and evangelism is refreshing when talking to the folks and working with apps and documentation in the BSD camps. It's good to set the politics aside and just focus on the geek factor and neatness of tinkering on a UNIX-like system.
  
  My $0.02 + Sales Tax.
  
  --
  
  do() || do_not(); // try();
2. Re:Keep in mind by Homology · 2004-10-06 04:56 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  The only issues i've ever had with FreeBSD in the past is that i'm wined and dined with some of the more `current' or special features that are easily available in Linux- Things in the past like AA fonts for X11, games like quakeforge (kinda buggy on fbsd), mozilla-firebird, vmware, libSDL, etc... No effort to make it go, just apt-get install it and it works.
  
  All of the *BSD has this, with the exception that OpenBSD does not accept non-free binary drivers.
  I'm typing this on an older laptop (PII 30MHz) with XFCE4 as desktop, using mozilla-firebird as web-browser. And yes, the AA actually works fine (this is part of XFree86).
  Actually, I'm surprised that so many are not aware that most applications used on Linux works just fine on any *BSD.
3. Re:Keep in mind by SillyNickName4me · 2004-10-06 06:08 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  > If this sorry piece of crap is what is to become the new STABLE I'm jumping ship. OTOH DragonFlyBSD is making progress very fast and the added value that is free of arrogant assholes (Poul-Henning Kamp and Dag-Erling Smograv).
  
  Instead, we get arrogant assholes like you?
  
  (btw, I like what Matt and friends are doing, nothing wrong with them, but the attitude some of their fans seem to have is just sad)
  
  > Joseph, FreeBSD user since the 2.2.8 days.
  
  Bart, FreeBSD user since the 2.0 days... your point being?
4. Re:Keep in mind by devphaeton · 2004-10-06 06:38 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  Instead, we get arrogant assholes like you?
  
  Those are slated for inclusion into the Ports distribution in 5.4.
  
  --
  
  do() || do_not(); // try();
5. Re:Keep in mind by molnarcs · 2004-10-06 07:59 · Score: 4, Interesting
  
  What a silly troll. This is a new kind: now instead of "BSD is dying" ones we got "PHK and DES is an asshole" trolls. I saw a similar messag in the NetBSD RC2 announcment.
  I've been reading current mailing list for the past 2 months quite regularly, and my impression of both devs is a positive one. DES goes sometimes crazy, but disagreements are resolved in an open and honest manner - read: by providing pro and con arguments - (even though they sometimes border on flamewars), but that's not a problem I think. PHK's posts usually carry an air of authority, but that's also fine, and he makes a lot of contributions. (Linus has this kind of authority as well). Otherwise, both DES and PHK seemed to be quite helpful with current users, at least since I've been reading the list. Of course, you probably could come up with examples to the contrary, but that doesn't prove that they are not nice people, it only proves that they are human.
  As to Matt Dillon: the reason for DragonFly is technical. He had different ideas about the direction 5.x should take than the rest of the project. Since more ppl disagreed w/ him than agreed w/ him, he left. Fair enough. On his way out, he stepped on some developer's toes, and some developers stepped on his toes, and that is also normal I think.
  What isn't normal is that some people cannot switch to another OS without being an asshole. I mean, who is this AC? A DragonFly zealot? What would someone gain from such comments? Fewer people would use FreeBSD? And why is this good for AC? I mean, it is FREE software, no one is forced to use it. Or is his heart bleeding for poor Matt Dillon because of what that evil PHK and DES did to him, so he tries to discredit them? Does he have a (platonic) relationship with Matt? (like some users have with Linus - no offense). This is sick.
6. Re:Keep in mind by Baki · 2004-10-07 02:13 · Score: 4, Interesting
  
  I have tried out 5.3 beta7 on my thinkpad (r50) laptop and I was very impressed. On my desktop I run linux latest 2.6 kernel (gentoo), and a true suspend and resume (acpi S3) does not work at all. ACPI S4 (hibernation) with software-suspend2 patches does not resume properly. However in this FBSD release it works flawlessly, even when running X (xorg 6.7), with connected internal laptop mouse and usb mouse. Everything just works without tweaking and patching: set correct options in /etc/rc.conf, that's all.
  
  I have really pounded the installation by installing ports while playing DVD's and xdiv files using mplayer and ogle on the background, using emacs for newsgroup reading: everything runs smoothly, sound just works (snd_ich module).
  
  The complete install of OS and ports (after cvsup) and rebuilding world and kernel was really painless. It took only a few hours in total to get a "cpu optimized" install similar to gentoo.
  
  If it were not for vmware I would move my desktop immediately to FBSD 5.3. It's ease of use from an admin perspective is unmatched by anything I know.
7. Re:Keep in mind by devphaeton · 2004-10-07 05:03 · Score: 4, Interesting
  
  Actually, I'm surprised that so many are not aware that most applications used on Linux works just fine on any *BSD.
  
  Exactly. I was just naive or perhaps not motivated enough to get something like that to work. I didn't even try. But in this case i'm seeing how very simple it is, and in some cases more simple (or at least more logical) than what it was on linux.
  
  (silly me, i know)
  
  I'm really starting to think that this will be the turning point for me though. My main workstation is Debian (sid) and my secondary machine is FreeBSD 4.9... but i think after the official release of 5.3 my main will be Fbsd and my secondary will be linux.
  
  --
  
  do() || do_not(); // try();
Post BitTorrent in summary for RELEASE! by CaptainPinko · 2004-10-06 03:50 · Score: 5, Insightful

For whomever decides to submit the article for the RELEASE of 5.3 would you please post a torrent? The horde of /. that will want it immediately will get to get it faster since they won't be bogging down the server. People who don't have the a BT client can then have the FTP all to themselves while we share our unsued bandwidth. Plus, that gives those of us on slower connections the ability to turn off the computer and resume the download later WITHOUT the fear of corruption.
Please mod this up so any submitters and story accepters can see this. (I'm not a karma whoe, got quite enough just wanted this to start at +2)

PS: why does it take so long for the FreeBSD people so long to update their schedule?

--
Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
Re:Surprised by hugo_pt · 2004-10-06 05:34 · Score: 4, Interesting

There has been some discussion in the freebsd mailing lists about this change. BIND now resides in /var/named/ and some people are not confortable about this. The default behaviour now is chrooting named too. Personally, I like the old way better (/etc/namedb) as /var has a specific usage on FreeBSD, which is not keeping DNS server records. Changing the default from BIND8 to BIND9 will already make some people angry (because of migration issues), let alone changing bind base directory to a directory that won't fit in the freebsd philosophy.. You can read the whole discussion at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current /2004-October/039288.html