XAML Development Today, But Not From Microsoft
Paul Colton writes "My company, Xamlon, has just released its flagship product, also called Xamlon. It allows for XAML development on all supported Windows platform, from Win98 through Longhorn. We're also investigating Mono and Java as possible development targets. CNET recently wrote a story of our launch."
. . .how much does one of the slashvertizements cost?
One set of balls big enough to submit selfpromotion as a story. A bonus point if they're big, fat, hairy monkey balls.
KFG
According to MSDN, it's pronounced "Zamel"
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
Comment removed based on user account deletion
For those of you wondering, here's a short explanation from www.xaml.net:
Transaction Authority Markup Language (XAML) is a vendor-neutral standard that enables the coordination and processing of online transactions in the rapidly emerging world of XML web services - the revolutionary new model of Internet-based computing that is now being adopted by all major systems and software vendors. XAML is intended to be a completely open standard for web-based business transactions.
The standard defines a set of XML message formats and interaction models that web services can use in order to provide business-level transactions that span multiple parties across the Internet.
Sigs are for the weak.
Well, XAML and XUL are similar technologies with similar goals. As far as that goes, Mozilla seems to have been there first, and is open source. They are therefore the preferred party. Microsoft has marketing dollars, so they are probably going to attract most developers.
Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
*Poof* It's gone. It's just temporary, but it always makes me feel better at the end of the day.
Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
XUL stands for eXtensible User-interface Language, which if I'm not mistaken is an XML dialect (XML of course being eXtensible Markup Language).
It was dreamed up by the Mozilla team to allow GUI interfaces to be designed in a cross-platform manner without referring to the inner-workings of the platform. It has considerable support and allows you to use mozilla as your development platform instead of just a browser. The mozilla engine which itself is cross-platform handles all the nasty stuff under the hood.
Avalon is Microsoft's answer to XUL. It's not as powerful. It's not cross-platform. It doesn't free you from the underpinnings and shortcomings of the underlying OS. It just makes it easier to develop in it. It also allows for using SVG graphics (another XML dialect).
XAML is this company's knock-off product that beats Microsoft to the punch. How well it does it is anyone's guess at this point. I myself don't know.
However, I do know that it's not cross-platform and that's why everyone is talking about promoting XUL instead of XAML.
XAML is this company's ticket into getting acquired, IMHO.
Later.
What, you mean like this?
With all the generously moderated posts about slashdot advertising, the herd has forgotten about this OPEN SOURCE PROJECT that does the same thing as Xamlon!
Amazing magic tricks
Looking at the xulmaker web page, I don't have high hopes for it:
XAML is still vaporware, MS could change the XAML specs lots of times till 2006. Applications based on Xamlon would probably need lots of modifications to work on MS XAML. And still you are only targeting windows.
l
XUL on the other hand is multiplatform and you can code XUL apps right now. A problem with XUL atm is that you cann't write stand-alone apps. Your XUL apps need to run through a mozilla browser.
That is all to change though, with the release of XRE http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xul/xre.html and GRE http://www.mozilla.org/projects/embedding/GRE.htm
I just hope these runtimes are released before MS releases XAML.
VStrider.
Laszlo Systems just announced an open-source cross-platform XML/Javascript based app building tool. That is much more interesting news I would think.