Slashdot Mirror


John Doerr Disclaims Rumored GBrowser

iseff writes "Contrary to the rumors which have been circulating, John Doerr (VC and early investor in Google) told the Web 2.0 conference that although he believes in another browser war, Google won't be a part of it. Then again, he did say he didn't know everything that goes on at Google, even though he's on the board. Now it makes you wonder why Google registered gbrowser.com?"

17 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. Browser? by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 5, Funny
    Now it makes you wonder why Google registered gbrowser.com?

    No it doesn't. They also registered googlesucks.com, but I don't think they feel that way about themselves.

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    1. Re:Browser? by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny

      They registered Googlesucks.com? This is clear evidence they're entering the vacuum cleaner market!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      They registered Googlesucks.com? This is clear evidence they're entering the vacuum cleaner market!

      Crap! I was hoping it was an adult content search engine :(

    3. Re:Browser? by polecat_redux · · Score: 5, Funny

      They also registered googlesucks.com

      It's called cybersquatting. They obviously want to extort money from someone who has a legitimate reason to register googlesucks.com.

  2. normal trademark behavior by Speare · · Score: 5, Funny

    Normal operating procedure with concepts nowadays:

    • discuss idea at lunch
    • register five variants of the name
    • consider a few features
    • focus test among friends over beer
    • tell management
    • make a powerpoint mockup
    • focus test among friends' spouses over weekend
    • issue a press release denying it
    • ...

    Why is this news?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  3. Gbrowser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google didn't register that to produce a web browser.

    No, my friends. Google registered it as a ladies' novilty underware store. The truth is out, can you handle the truth?

  4. Is anyone keeping score? by TrollBridge · · Score: 5, Funny

    So would this make Google more Evil or less Evil? Who's keeping track this week?

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:Is anyone keeping score? by rmarll · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is google's week to be good. IBM have the last week of the month, unless SCO has another press release, then they're good that week as well.
      Sun is good on all days that are multiples of 5 and evil on the 11th and 23rd of the month. When available they are evil on the 29th of February.
      I've lost track of Oracle but I think they alternate the 2nd and third weeks of the month. Microsoft is always evil unless Timothy posts the news, in which case Slashdot is evil for posting a duped story and MS passes go and collects their 200 bucks.

      It's incomplete but there is the rundown on the schedule as far as I can tell.

  5. Re:nlookup so you wont have by TCM · · Score: 5, Funny

    What are you doing on slashdot if you confuse nslookup and whois?

    --
    Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
  6. Re:nlookup so you wont have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What are you doing on slashdot if you confuse nslookup and whois?"

    At a guess, security-consulting for companies who confuse microsoft with secure software... ;)

  7. Re:nlookup so you wont have by wuice · · Score: 4, Funny

    Probably reading stories, comments, posting comments, you know.. the usual.

  8. There is no spoon by wuice · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now it makes you wonder why Google registered gbrowser.com

    Just to keep you fuckers guessing.

  9. Why did they register it? by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 4, Funny
    There's only one reason that Google registered gbrowser.com, in my mind...

    They like seeing their name and logo on Slashdot's front page. One URL has garnered them two stories.

    It's some very cheap publicity, isn't it? Say hat you will, but it's worked for them. :)

    --
    Goo goo g'joob.
  10. Re:Cheaper than a trademark lawsuit... by justplainchips · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft had public good will?

  11. Re:Cheaper than a trademark lawsuit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If only Microsoft was smart enough to register:
    aindows.com
    bindows.com
    cindows.com
    dindows.com
    eindows.com
    findows.com
    gindows.com
    hindows.com
    iindows.com
    jindows.com
    kindows.c om
    lindows.com
    mindows.com
    nindows.com
    oindows .com
    pindows.com
    qindows.com
    rindows.com
    sindo ws.com
    tindows.com
    uindows.com
    vindows.com
    win dows.com (oh wait!)
    xindows.com
    yindows.com
    zindows.com

    They wouldn't have had to put up with a lawsuit against Lindows.

  12. other google domains by sadangel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google has also registered:

    galbums.com
    gbackup.com
    gbeam.com
    ggovernment .com
    ggroups.com
    ghomepage.com
    ghomepages.com
    ghoroscope.com
    glistings.com
    gschedule.com
    gsen d.com
    gtaxes.com

    Go crazy with that if you want to. I particularly like ggovernment.com. Clearly google is planning on starting their own "ggovernment" to overthrow conventional governments and take over the world. They must be stopped!

  13. Re:Cheaper than a trademark lawsuit... by uriber · · Score: 4, Funny
    Speaking of Microsoft, I just found out that gmicrosoft.com expired yesterday.

    If Google will be quick to grab it, they'll be able to create their own version of an evil monopoly!