John Doerr Disclaims Rumored GBrowser
iseff writes "Contrary to the rumors which have been circulating, John Doerr (VC and early investor in Google) told the Web 2.0 conference that although he believes in another browser war, Google won't be a part of it. Then again, he did say he didn't know everything that goes on at Google, even though he's on the board. Now it makes you wonder why Google registered gbrowser.com?"
No it doesn't. They also registered googlesucks.com, but I don't think they feel that way about themselves.
"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
Normal operating procedure with concepts nowadays:
Why is this news?
[
So would this make Google more Evil or less Evil? Who's keeping track this week?
There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
What are you doing on slashdot if you confuse nslookup and whois?
Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
"What are you doing on slashdot if you confuse nslookup and whois?"
;)
At a guess, security-consulting for companies who confuse microsoft with secure software...
Now it makes you wonder why Google registered gbrowser.com
Just to keep you fuckers guessing.
Microsoft had public good will?
Google has also registered:
t .com
ghoroscope.comn d.com
galbums.com
gbackup.com
gbeam.com
ggovernmen
ggroups.com
ghomepage.com
ghomepages.com
glistings.com
gschedule.com
gse
gtaxes.com
Go crazy with that if you want to. I particularly like ggovernment.com. Clearly google is planning on starting their own "ggovernment" to overthrow conventional governments and take over the world. They must be stopped!