MPAA Blames Linux Australia Notice on Human Error
rjch writes "According to ZDNet Australia, the MPAA is blaming their recent takedown notice to Linux Australia as 'human error'. 'MPAA spokesman Matt Grossman denied the MPAA's system, which sends out 100,000 notices of claimed infringement on an annual basis was flawed. He said the organisation was not doing blind keyword matching against Internet content and sending out automatic infringement notices without checks, as Linux Australia had previously claimed.' When asked why this slipped through their checks, Grossman told Builder AU 'the answer is a simple human error unfortunately. Everyone has a bad day'. Grossman further denied the MPAA was sending out unsolicited e-mails."
But this has happened before. I remember way back when they started this whole charade they accused some lady using a mac that she was pirating music using a program that only works on windows...
No, I'm afraid this has happened too many times already.
So no, I don't think it would be eaiser or cheaper.
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
It's an ominous line that HAL says in "2001: A Space Odyssey"
Homme petit d'homme petit, s'attend, n'avale
Since the MPAA thinks a $3,000 to $11,000 judgement is acceptable for someone accused of 'stealing' music, then I suppose a $3,000,000 to $11,000,000 judgement is acceptable for someone from MPAA accused of fraud and perjury. I figure MPAA is at least 1,000 times the size of the average file swapper.
The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.